forest of dean redneck 11,738 Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 Just popped up on local facebook page,and their idiots saying how lovely,and they should be here not us ,it's enough to make me puke! Then someone says it would be nice to see wolves again,ffs I can't even be bothered to argue,it would be nice to see her be first victim to a hungry or pissed off wolf,fecking idiots. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
neems 2,406 Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 would a couple of dogs take a lynx? can you imagine the carnage wolves would cause in this country? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,817 Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/earthnews/11457882/Wild-lynx-to-return-to-Britain-after-1300-years.html I liked this comment; The rewilders talk nicely about biodiversity and ecosystems, but what gives the game away is how they always seem to want to reintroduce big, dramatic beasties. Where’s the campaign to bring back the blue stag beetle or the brine shrimp, both absent from our shores since the 19th century? Rewilding isn’t about restoring the glory of nature. It’s about people thinking the nature we have isn’t interesting enough and needs to be sexed up. 9 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,817 Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 (edited) As much as I look to places like Alaska and envy the large predators they have, 21st century overcrowded Britain ain't the place for them. Another example of people jumping on their environmentalist high horse claiming to be naturalists and supporting nature, but in actual fact only really give a shit about what they want nature to look like. And I'm not sure there would be such a deer problem if bambi wasn't put on a fecking pedestal and stalking was made more accessible to folks. Edited March 9, 2015 by Born Hunter 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
forest of dean redneck 11,738 Posted March 9, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 It's fine for pack of wolves to run down and rip apart a deer eating it half alive ,as that's nature,but one or two lurchers bringing one down for owner to eat is cruel and barbaric,lol 14 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mackem 27,598 Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 The average pack of wolves arent going to expend valuable energy in this country running around after deer,they are going to head straight for the nearest farm and create havoc on the sheep,cows,dogs and little girls dressed in red capes Have you seen the size of the f*ckers 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Quarter bull 240 Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 There a bunch of physcos, hypocrites, just shoot the thing lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
D Lloyd 2,790 Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 Highlands of Scotland ain't over crowded Plenty Red Deer up there for food. thanks max lol any bull xs for sale lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bullx100% 681 Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 Be a weird feeling when out lamping hunting a couple rabbits for the pot then realising there's something in the tree line hunting you!!!! A big hungry wolf.....I'd shit my self and probly scream like red riding hood lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
unlacedgecko 1,466 Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 As much as I look to places like Alaska and envy the large predators they have, 21st century overcrowded Britain ain't the place for them. Another example of people jumping on their environmentalist high horse claiming to be naturalists and supporting nature, but in actual fact only really give a shit about what they want nature to look like. And I'm not sure there would be such a deer problem if bambi wasn't put on a fecking pedestal and stalking was made more accessible to folks. Or if it was legal to take them without a prohibitively expensive FAC and/or guide. If only there was a way for the average man to hunt deer with nothing more than the landowners permission. Or even Crown land being open end to hunting by the public. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,817 Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 (edited) As much as I look to places like Alaska and envy the large predators they have, 21st century overcrowded Britain ain't the place for them. Another example of people jumping on their environmentalist high horse claiming to be naturalists and supporting nature, but in actual fact only really give a shit about what they want nature to look like. And I'm not sure there would be such a deer problem if bambi wasn't put on a fecking pedestal and stalking was made more accessible to folks. Or if it was legal to take them without a prohibitively expensive FAC and/or guide. If only there was a way for the average man to hunt deer with nothing more than the landowners permission. Or even Crown land being open end to hunting by the public. Dog men won't bring the deer population under control mate nationally, perhaps localised populations. I'd argue for that to be legalised under a completely different banner, same as bow hunting. If you can afford to build a kennel and feed/school a dog or three for a year or two then I'm sure you can afford a stalking setup. It's not the cost that's the problem. Edited March 9, 2015 by Born Hunter 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
General lee 979 Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 Didn't read the link buti agree this isn't the place for wolfs but I'd like to see lynx introduced to Britain Quote Link to post Share on other sites
J Darcy 5,871 Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 What is it about these 'conservationists' obsessions with apex predators and 'extinct' mammals. Why not put effort into what animals we have left. The red kite introduction is the worst thing that could have ever happened for native ground nesting birds, particularly in the North of England. mark my words, the truth will come out but maybe not before the peewit and the curlew and the grey partridge have been predated into extinction. the survival rate of these chicks in red kite country must be less than 10%, in a matter of years there's going to be some major major decline in such birds. That's MHO. JD 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
unlacedgecko 1,466 Posted March 9, 2015 Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 As much as I look to places like Alaska and envy the large predators they have, 21st century overcrowded Britain ain't the place for them. Another example of people jumping on their environmentalist high horse claiming to be naturalists and supporting nature, but in actual fact only really give a shit about what they want nature to look like. And I'm not sure there would be such a deer problem if bambi wasn't put on a fecking pedestal and stalking was made more accessible to folks. Or if it was legal to take them without a prohibitively expensive FAC and/or guide. If only there was a way for the average man to hunt deer with nothing more than the landowners permission. Or even Crown land being open end to hunting by the public. Dog men won't bring the deer population under control mate nationally, perhaps localised populations. I'd argue for that to be legalised under a completely different banner, same as bow hunting. If you can afford to build a kennel and feed/school a dog or three for a year or two then I'm sure you afford a stalking setup. It's not the cost that's the problem. I disagree about the cost. I cost me £300 for the safe, £300 for DSC1, £50 for the FAC, £1100 for the rifle (including sights and mod) and £1800 for DSC2. I could feed a dog for a lot less than that. Also, dogs can be used where it is not safe/practical to use a rifle. All it needs for a national population to be controlled is for a lot of people to do it locally, in various different locales. I agree that bow hunting should be legalised as well. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
forest of dean redneck 11,738 Posted March 9, 2015 Author Report Share Posted March 9, 2015 What is it about these 'conservationists' obsessions with apex predators and 'extinct' mammals. Why not put effort into what animals we have left. The red kite introduction is the worst thing that could have ever happened for native ground nesting birds, particularly in the North of England. mark my words, the truth will come out but maybe not before the peewit and the curlew and the grey partridge have been predated into extinction. the survival rate of these chicks in red kite country must be less than 10%, in a matter of years there's going to be some major major decline in such birds. That's MHO. JDAgree,why not save the hedgehog or garden birds instead of introducing big mammals,Their extinct for a reason ,they ate livestock and were fecking dangerous,lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.