All Kicked Off In Paris

[pesky1972 5,325]

Said it years ago on here, there'll be civil war on our streets

 

Deport each and everyone of them, then carpet bomb the entire region from middle east to malasia into extinction. Job done, few innocents killed granted but who gives a fuckk? They obviously don't!

What about Ahmed Merabet's family. Should they be carpet bombed?

[blackmaggie 3,376]

a 3rd incident is now being reported in the tropadera centre paris not sure whats happening yet but how long before theses attacks happen here again time to round up all them expected of extremists and feck human rights

a false alarm in the tropedera

[mushroom 13,186]

You think they give a shit about one of their own?? Lmao how many Muslims died in the twin towers attack???

 

That copper as brave as he was will be used as martyr propaganda as the the 911 victims were

[rodp 316]

Come on shroom, there's no need to be committing genocide or for any other emotional retaliatory response.

 

There's plenty of innocent folks in the Middle East that we should have no grievance with and to kill them as 'collateral' I would find morally intolerable.

 

A strong and aggressive military action should be taken, but lets not sacrifice our humanity. We have the capability to target the guilty and rid this world of them without having to commit genocide.

We don't actually, no-one does. The militants hide behind civilians, usually women and children, because they're basically cowards. We don't yet have missiles that pick out the guilty and leave the innocent

 

The terrorists know this and use it to their advantage. There will be no end to this until we accept sufficient civilian casualties to drive the civilians into pointing the finger at the terrorists.

Unfortunately that's going to be the only way, the civilians will have to choose between death from the allies bombs or give up the terrorists..

 

Of course, the do gooders in parliament will just not accept this ............................... until it comes to their front door, ........ and it's on route as we speak. How long before the mussies twig on the MP's rule the country, therefore they're prime targets. A couple of MP's shot in the street and things will change very quickly.

[pesky1972 5,325]

You think they give a shit about one of their own?? Lmao how many Muslims died in the twin towers attack???

 

That copper as brave as he was will be used as martyr propaganda as the the 911 victims were

Not asking what 'they' think of the muslim copper.., I'm asking you if you think the guy's family deserve to be carpet bombed? Bearing in mind the guy died whilst trying to prevent these animals, and in service to France.

[mushroom 13,186]

See robots post

 

Subjugate the cnuts the same as the yanks did to the Japanese, only then will paths be laid

[mushroom 13,186]

To answer more directly, yes, casualties of war and this is a war whether you like it or not!

[rodp 316]

 

You think they give a shit about one of their own?? Lmao how many Muslims died in the twin towers attack???

 

That copper as brave as he was will be used as martyr propaganda as the the 911 victims were

Not asking what 'they' think of the muslim copper.., I'm asking you if you think the guy's family deserve to be carpet bombed? Bearing in mind the guy died whilst trying to prevent these animals, and in service to France.

 

No they don't, but can you honestly see any other answer ? Or do we just put up with it and accept the fact we'll have these nutters running about for ever more?

[Born Hunter 17,788]

Fair comment BH

 

Do you you think mussies give a fuckk?

 

Nah mate!

 

Regardless of which country they come from, Islam is backwards

 

Your average Syrian, Algerian, Iraqi, Arab, Persian/Iranian etc imo just want to live their lives much the same as the rest of us. Their culture is different to ours and it's not my place to pass judgement on that. I haven't the slightest problem with Islam or any religion, I have problems with certain actions brought about by interpretations of it though. And the inconvenient truth is that there are plenty of practicing Muslims who's moral compass points in the same direction as my own, so I find it very difficult to have a grievance with them all. Not to mention the fact that their are plenty of non Islamic cultures living in that region too.

 

The middle east has been a region of huge strategic value to the west for the past 100 years and prior to that of huge religious and cultural value. Because of this the West has inevitably caused grievances and as a consequence we are seeing a religious reaction. IMO it wouldn't matter what religion was predominant, we would still be seeing extremism in the name of it. Now, don't mistake these words for admission of guilt or blame, I'm merely stating what I believe to be the reality of the situation.

 

Without a shadow of a doubt we need a strong and aggressive military response both foreign and domestic. These incidents haven't changed my views at all, I'm not inclined to react emotionally. But none of that will matter, the average Joe will continue to prioritise Defence lower than every other area of Government and become more and more emotional in their response to these attacks because they have historically and continually lacked the substance to support proactive military action. Pushing themselves into such reactionary emotional suggestions like genocide etc.

 

JMO mate.

[WILF 47,353]

Nothing will happen if they hit MPs, look at Aiery Neive.....blown to bits inside the House of Commons grounds and it still took years.......the only politician (if they were targeted) who's death would trigger what needs doing would be the President Of The United States.

No one else matters enough.

 

The only innocents in all this are the general public, not politicians, not Muslims, not race relations people, not left wing activists......just the general public.

 

Even now the political class won't actually give a f**k that people are dieing, they will just be worried that it's making them look bad.

It's puts them in focus which is a place they dont like being unless a team of press officers have carefully engineered it !!

[Born Hunter 17,788]

 

Come on shroom, there's no need to be committing genocide or for any other emotional retaliatory response.

 

There's plenty of innocent folks in the Middle East that we should have no grievance with and to kill them as 'collateral' I would find morally intolerable.

 

A strong and aggressive military action should be taken, but lets not sacrifice our humanity. We have the capability to target the guilty and rid this world of them without having to commit genocide.

We don't actually, no-one does. The militants hide behind civilians, usually women and children, because they're basically cowards. We don't yet have missiles that pick out the guilty and leave the innocent

 

The terrorists know this and use it to their advantage. There will be no end to this until we accept sufficient civilian casualties to drive the civilians into pointing the finger at the terrorists.

Unfortunately that's going to be the only way, the civilians will have to choose between death from the allies bombs or give up the terrorists..

 

Of course, the do gooders in parliament will just not accept this ............................... until it comes to their front door, ........ and it's on route as we speak. How long before the mussies twig on the MP's rule the country, therefore they're prime targets. A couple of MP's shot in the street and things will change very quickly.

 

 

I'm sorry but you're just wrong. We don't have to commit genocide to fight insurgency, that's a proven fact. Collateral damage is to be expected but simply killing entire populations because it's easy is genocide, not collateral.

 

In Afghanistan our troops were asked to fight a war against insurgency with their hands completely tied. A similar war on a smaller scale was fought in the post Iraq invasion by special forces, so with greater freedom, and the insurgency problem was flattened.

[Brigzy 1,298]

These attacks and hostage situations could be diversions, tying up the police and the security services while a big one is being planned. I hope not, but I'm sure the people in charge have ALLREADY thought of this and are planning accordingly.

[rodp 316]

 

Fair comment BH

 

Do you you think mussies give a fuckk?

 

Nah mate!

 

Regardless of which country they come from, Islam is backwards

 

Your average Syrian, Algerian, Iraqi, Arab, Persian/Iranian etc imo just want to live their lives much the same as the rest of us. Their culture is different to ours and it's not my place to pass judgement on that. I haven't the slightest problem with Islam or any religion, I have problems with certain actions brought about by interpretations of it though. And the inconvenient truth is that there are plenty of practicing Muslims who's moral compass points in the same direction as my own, so I find it very difficult to have a grievance with them all. Not to mention the fact that their are plenty of non Islamic cultures living in that region too.

 

The middle east has been a region of huge strategic value to the west for the past 100 years and prior to that of huge religious and cultural value. Because of this the West has inevitably caused grievances and as a consequence we are seeing a religious reaction. IMO it wouldn't matter what religion was predominant, we would still be seeing extremism in the name of it. Now, don't mistake these words for admission of guilt or blame, I'm merely stating what I believe to be the reality of the situation.

 

Without a shadow of a doubt we need a strong and aggressive military response both foreign and domestic. These incidents haven't changed my views at all, I'm not inclined to react emotionally. But none of that will matter, the average Joe will continue to prioritise Defence lower than every other area of Government and become more and more emotional in their response to these attacks because they have historically and continually lacked the substance to support proactive military action. Pushing themselves into such reactionary emotional suggestions like genocide etc.

 

JMO mate.

 

So just what do you suggest other than carpet bombing whole areas and accepting civilian casualties?

[mushroom 13,186]

Opinions are like arseholesaye... We all have thwm

 

The fact that I can voice mine at this time without fear of some goat shagging Muslim hacking my head off/stoning me to death/butchering my family or worse means a great deal to me! If you really don't believe these cnuts need curbing, sending back and taught to behave civilly with their other human brothers and sisters then get ready to convert to shislam.

[rodp 316]

 

 

Come on shroom, there's no need to be committing genocide or for any other emotional retaliatory response.

 

There's plenty of innocent folks in the Middle East that we should have no grievance with and to kill them as 'collateral' I would find morally intolerable.

 

A strong and aggressive military action should be taken, but lets not sacrifice our humanity. We have the capability to target the guilty and rid this world of them without having to commit genocide.

We don't actually, no-one does. The militants hide behind civilians, usually women and children, because they're basically cowards. We don't yet have missiles that pick out the guilty and leave the innocent

 

The terrorists know this and use it to their advantage. There will be no end to this until we accept sufficient civilian casualties to drive the civilians into pointing the finger at the terrorists.

Unfortunately that's going to be the only way, the civilians will have to choose between death from the allies bombs or give up the terrorists..

 

Of course, the do gooders in parliament will just not accept this ............................... until it comes to their front door, ........ and it's on route as we speak. How long before the mussies twig on the MP's rule the country, therefore they're prime targets. A couple of MP's shot in the street and things will change very quickly.

 

 

I'm sorry but you're just wrong. We don't have to commit genocide to fight insurgency, that's a proven fact. Collateral damage is to be expected but simply killing entire populations because it's easy is genocide, not collateral.

 

In Afghanistan our troops were asked to fight a war against insurgency with their hands completely tied. A similar war on a smaller scale was fought in the post Iraq invasion by special forces, so with greater freedom, and the insurgency problem was flattened.

 

So, if we won the war in Afghanistan and Iraq who the hell are these nutters now in France? These all stem from the same lot. We haven't won, we merely wounded a few and now they're regrouping and bringing the war to us.

 

And I didn't say genocide, I deliberately didn't use the word as it brings to mind the mass extermination of populations. I said civilian casualties, and those we will have to accept otherwise we'll just annoy them even more !