shepp 2,285 Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 Even if it is the case that voting UKIP will increase the risk of Dead Millipede getting in, i personally believe that it is worth the risk. UKIP can not get pass this stage in there growth without sacrifices being made. Let's face it, there is not much between Labour and Conservative now so will it really matter? We should vote for who we want to hold power and not for who we want to stop getting in. It could even result in a UKIP / Conservative coilition. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RemyBolt 420 Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 (edited) UKIP are a bigger threat than ebola...not a threat to the UK population, but a threat to the dirge that currently resonates in the houses of parliament. UKIP is now seen as being more than a protest vote. It's being seen as a positive step towards a better government option. When the Argentinian Democracy App becomes widespread things will be really fascinating! A vote for UKIP is not a vote for Labour. Whoever said that is an idiot! The first 4 words of that sentence clearly state it's A VOTE FOR UKIP. As a better slogan, A VOTE FOR UKIP IS A VOTE FOR THE UK. The best part...all the media cover! It's doing nothing more than cementing the strength, dominance, and position of UKIP. What's the old expression "There's no such thing as bad publicity"? Edited October 10, 2014 by RemyBolt 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flipper_Al 1,012 Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 Theres a lot of people out there very worried by the way UKIP is going about its business..... Might make politics a bit more intresting.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 There's a long way to go until UKIP will be in a position to honour their promises. I really do think that in the GE we'll see a Conservative/UKIP coalition......... though that's perhaps more a hope than a prediction. I can't see UKIP going from zero MPs to a majority government in such a rom short time, I just don't think the staunch Conservative/labour voters will change attitudes quickly enough even if they were tempted to. But at the same time I am a little terrified of Labour getting back in. A Conservative/UKIP coalition is the best I dare hope for. I also reckon that in such a coalition UKIP would be a nightmare for the conservatives, they'd have f**k all to loose by standing strong and defiant against any compromises in policy. Unlike the Lib Dems.... Bang on the money. However much we would like to see it UKIP will not win a general election in the very near future, the best outcome will be for UKIP to form an allegiance with Conservative and start implementing their polices through a united govt. Make no mistake the absolute worst outcome for this country is for Labour to get into power. You may as we'll sell up and move abroad, they will revert to borrowing to make sure they have the money to provide all the layabouts with more benefits and open the immigration doors even wider. Let's face it the more section of the public that are poor the more votes the Labour Party will get bring in families of immigrants dependent on the state automatic voter its a no brainer. Oh and if we get a UKIP/Con govt maybe just maybe with Cameron and Farage we may see some action on the hunting act?? 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,751 Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 Yep, agree with all that. Regards the hunting act, nothing will happen without a pro hunting majority and that is most likely to come from a right of centre political coalition/majority government, so as things stand, Cons/UKIP. However, in the aftermath of the Scottish Indy referendum we have this English Assembly/Parliament idea being shouted about. To me that's another opportunity for hunting act repeal, as their is far more likely to be a pro hunting majority in such a political establishment than in Westminster due to the Scots Labour influence. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest ragumup Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 I rest my case... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Brewman 1,192 Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 I rest my case... Nobody likes a smug fecker lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,569 Posted October 10, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 Farage thinks the Manchester result is more significant, and I'd have to agree with him (like he needs my advice !). Carswell is popular with the locals, and had a substantial majority, which always made him favourite to win. In Middleton, however, Labour had a large majority, while UKIP had little support base, no traditional local affinities and an unknown candidate. From that position, they literally came from nowhere and reduced a Labour majority of over 6,000 down to 617 - yet still Millipede had that smug grin plastered on his face ! CaMoron is clearly rattled, though. The UKIP victory could be the impetus for another handful of disillusioned Tory MP's to jump ship - some of them in very safe seats. Equally, their win will signal to wavering potential voters that a vote for UKIP is no longer a wasted or 'protest' vote - and that could see yet another increase in their support. Next is the Rochester by - election - a straight two horse race between Tory and UKIP - Labour and LibDem are both irrelevant there. For what my opinion's worth, I think that if UKIP win, more Tories will definitely desert the sinking ship, and CaMoron's leadership will come into question - Boris will be pleased .......................... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest ragumup Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
marshman 7,757 Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 Mr Farage is having to defends remarks he made about not letting immagrants into the country with HIV . Why has he got to defend these remarks ?surely people will vote for because he made these remarks lol ! 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tandors 888 Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 I wonder what that middleton by election result would be if they showed the statistics of who voted for who. I reckon without immigrants and their descendents voting for labout they would have collapsed, the true white working class (not layabouts or antifa student types) seems to be leaving them in droves for ukip. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ggib 370 Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 A con/ukip government could be a good thing for hunting and general life in gb. With farrage the thorn in Cameron's side he might grow his balls back again and work well with ukip. For the better of he uk. For farrage has shown all the media racist bullkack soon dies out after a day or 2 when they realise the majority of natives believe most of what ukip stand for. Maybe farrage can guide Cameron through pm life standing up for what he believes in instead of bowing down to the scum who invaded these shores 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sussex 5,777 Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 Mr Farage is having to defends remarks he made about not letting immagrants into the country with HIV . Why has he got to defend these remarks ?surely people will vote for because he made these remarks lol ! Watched that interview on Sky this morning the presenter thought he had Farage on the back foot , the answer Farage gave was as just about what every normal working person must think ,. the national health service is just that , a national health service not a world health service ! ... 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
midnighthunter 78 Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 well lads the way I see it as far hunting goes it wont matter who is in it will not alter this stupid ban at all the general public will see to that Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest ragumup Posted October 10, 2014 Report Share Posted October 10, 2014 (edited) Ukip want individual county's referendums on the hunting ban..... Edited October 10, 2014 by ragumup Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.