Jump to content

Another Child Killed By A Dog


Recommended Posts

pmsl yokel I've seen it happen myself my mates Staffordshire started having a go he panicked did not have a clue to separate the pair!!!! I shouted stick your fingers up its arse and he done it lol I still take the Piss now every time I see him. If you got a bull breed or worried about a bull breed attacking your dog's get a breaking stick lads simples.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 237
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Ive never bought into that no bad dogs just bad owners thing its just unrealistic to expect everything born of nature to be without fault......bulldogs being genetically that much closer to the source

The breed's immaterial really. People need to learn that no dogs should be trusted to be left alone with small kids & babies. Seems no matter how many times we read & hear about these incident

R.I.P. Young un... regards no bad dog, absolute tosh! over the yrs, i have kept and worked bullbreeds and terriers. all were raised and reared in exactly the same conditions. the vast majority were s

gnasher, so when im out walking my dogs i take a knife and gun yeah ? geez just asking a a what i thought a ok question,, only one hour after posting i was out walkin my two mutts and see my pal and he told me of a incident that happend a fews days earlier a neo mastiff got off lead and had him on floor while trying to get his dog, my reason for asking is ive been fearing for my dogs as this was going to happen, so now youve told me the outlaw now try inlaw..

You did ask for illegal methods?
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just a little aside for folk too young or perhaps too ignorant to realise...pre'80 or thereabouts hoisting a bottle of milk from someone's doorstep was considered very bad form, it was left there on trust and the taking of it was deemed to be the start of a breakdown in that trust in society (poorly kids were fed it at school). If the legals had the hump they were entitled to throw the book at such a liberty and serve up 6 months of imprisonment...of course post '80 and heroin (did i mention heroin) seems to have changed all that thinking. Though the milk nickers and the arsonists unquestionably had kids, who had kids, for folk wondering where the pit human biters have arrived from (nature/nurture)...ask yourself where the kids who boot thier mothers in the supermarket have arrived from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Society today ain't all that bad. Bloke my brother was working with is moving away so brothers been looking for another job. Old neighbour come into the butchers my mum works at, asked how were all doing. Said my brothers looking for a new job anyway he gave my mum a number. Brother called it not even knowing the name or what it the job was. First thing bloke says is you can start Monday my dad has always spoke good about you n your brother. So that's him been taken on doing scaffolding. Old neighbour had a walking stick and although he likes to get about in winter we'd go shop for him if he needed anyway. Guess it pays to be nice anyway off subject aswell but sorta made my day.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

Lost me :/

....... it will pass trust me :D

Whatever you do Dare don't trust him...he does'nt know what his own ticket looks like

Now I am lost, is this code?

 

Yes....its code for.... " ive never had the arsehole to confront somebody in real life so i,ll keep talking in riddles about them on the internet ".......see even a dumb cockney can work it out ;)

 

 

Talking in Riddles you say....'don't make me do it Max, i'll pick my phone up and phone my tout friend and have it confirmed in the hr'...you want a laff...and the tout said it's a wrong 'en

 

You want to ask around Len with regards to me showing up anywhere, you wont find me appaering for a free weekends deerstalking with phil lloyd and jean shrimpton and plenty members of this site have asked/begged many times....perhaps your sense of importance is what mkes you place ME, Myself and i....in the same sentence.

 

 

How pathetically weak having to use another mans debate to prove a point.....hilarious !!...( and if your going to re tell someone elses story at least get it right ).........is there anything you wont do or say to get out of backing yourself up in the real world ?.....call me old fashioned but i despise people who get all shirty but when called to stand on they just curl up in a ball and go off on some pathetic incoherent mumbling noise of nothing in order not to have to march on in the direction their mouth was taking them !.........i like to think most of the folk i regularly converse with on here are of the " dont type something you wouldnt say to a mans face " mentality.......but you....no wonder no c**t knows what your on about most of the time.

 

Anyway its about that time again end of the month you being a loyal Manc fan and all.............not much point in even asking really is there !!

 

Just seen another couple of your posts on this topic :laugh::laugh::laugh: .....i take it all back please be my friend you have me in stitches sometimes

Edited by gnasher16
Link to post
Share on other sites

gnasher, so when im out walking my dogs i take a knife and gun yeah ? geez just asking a a what i thought a ok question,, only one hour after posting i was out walkin my two mutts and see my pal and he told me of a incident that happend a fews days earlier a neo mastiff got off lead and had him on floor while trying to get his dog, my reason for asking is ive been fearing for my dogs as this was going to happen, so now youve told me the outlaw now try inlaw..

 

Ok then triangle choke ? left hook ?..........or what about just dont take your dogs out ?....................i mean people with an irrational fear of getting run over probably dont cross roads right ?

 

Your either exercising your dogs in the wrong places or your fear is an irrational one that most other people dont seem to have mate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Excellent post and insight gnash, your depth of knowledge on the breed and subject is more than I can reckon with.

 

My concern is this, the authorities are presently more concerned on the breed(s) of dog rather than the owners and settings the dogs becomes subjected to. I do think there should stringent criteria attached to being able to own a dog that is deemed high risk, that said I think there is a danger of the baby being thrown out with the bath water and in the future it may be difficult for most.

 

Essentially it seems to me (I could be wrong ?) that the number dog attacks is increasing, all things considered I would still blame it on unsuitable owners, settings, much like kids with bad parents, create unruly menaces to society.

 

 

Nobody can change society and what youngsters deem to be " cool ".......ive said for a long time now something needs to be done in terms of the ease people can obtain a potentially dangerous dog.....ive always likened it to cars..... an 18 year old snotty nosed yobbo without a responsible bone in his body can LEGALLY go out and drive a 200mph supercar that does 0 - 60 mph in 3 seconds along any road in the country......what makes that scenario rare is insurance/licensing/money...........In the same way a Ferrari is not a beginners car a Pit Bull is not a beginners dog but there is nothing in place to stop that same irresponsible kid going out causing carnage with his dog the way there is with cars.....so ultimately i dont believe the solution is with the dogs or the owners its with the laws.....in the same way its not easy for irresponsible people to own dangerous cars the same needs to apply to dangerous dogs in my opinion......banning breeds doesnt work mistakes are still made,educating owners doesnt work mistakes are still made....so id like to see the mistakes taken out of peoples hands.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

gnash geez dont take my dogs ooot really??? hey was only wanting sum heads up lol hey not take offence as i did always read and like your posts and well [BANNED TEXT] the hell i know how to care for my dogs

but was well yeah worried thats all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Excellent post and insight gnash, your depth of knowledge on the breed and subject is more than I can reckon with.

 

My concern is this, the authorities are presently more concerned on the breed(s) of dog rather than the owners and settings the dogs becomes subjected to. I do think there should stringent criteria attached to being able to own a dog that is deemed high risk, that said I think there is a danger of the baby being thrown out with the bath water and in the future it may be difficult for most.

 

Essentially it seems to me (I could be wrong ?) that the number dog attacks is increasing, all things considered I would still blame it on unsuitable owners, settings, much like kids with bad parents, create unruly menaces to society.

 

 

Nobody can change society and what youngsters deem to be " cool ".......ive said for a long time now something needs to be done in terms of the ease people can obtain a potentially dangerous dog.....ive always likened it to cars..... an 18 year old snotty nosed yobbo without a responsible bone in his body can LEGALLY go out and drive a 200mph supercar that does 0 - 60 mph in 3 seconds along any road in the country......what makes that scenario rare is insurance/licensing/money...........In the same way a Ferrari is not a beginners car a Pit Bull is not a beginners dog but there is nothing in place to stop that same irresponsible kid going out causing carnage with his dog the way there is with cars.....so ultimately i dont believe the solution is with the dogs or the owners its with the laws.....in the same way its not easy for irresponsible people to own dangerous cars the same needs to apply to dangerous dogs in my opinion......banning breeds doesnt work mistakes are still made,educating owners doesnt work mistakes are still made....so id like to see the mistakes taken out of peoples hands.

 

spot on gnash, :thumbs: its that in nut shell , like ive said loads times in the right hands Brill Breed, wrong hands lethal, there not pet dogs =happy to 1 /2 walk in the park or play with what ever dog they meet, and more so if game bred 100% working dog bred for a job :yes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

gnash geez dont take my dogs ooot really??? hey was only wanting sum heads up lol hey not take offence as i did always read and like your posts and well [bANNED TEXT] the hell i know how to care for my dogs

but was well yeah worried thats all.

 

I wasnt getting at you mate i just dont know what you want folk to say......its like saying you are frightened of getting mugged or beaten up well dont go out then thats the only guarentee you have of staying safe........we all have concerns but what can you do other than what you know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ORT, there's a film script running in your canister.....get it down on paper I'm sure you would make a few quid.

It's complete fantasy land I reckon but that's niether here nor there really.

 

It would have some mileage as a script I reckon as your style is to say the least, unique !!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Waz
      Hundreds march in central London to protest police crackdown at the vigil for Sarah Everard - YouTube
    • By Gav
      Stornoway Airport has obtained a court order against Melbost and Brahanhuie crofters who accused the airfield operator of “squatting” on their land.
       
      The crofters legally control the the airfield site following the outcome of a recent Scottish Land Court decision which declared the land was never taken out of crofting tenure when their forebearers allowed it to be used as a military base during WW2.
       
      That means Hial do not own the airport while adjacent villages actually hold the rights.
       
      However, the company Hial, is appealing that decision at the Court of Session.
       
      The situation was inflamed over the past few days when the grazings committee wrote to the airport and other businesses sited on the land, advising them they were “squatting.”
       
      They requested proposals to “regularise your organisation’s position and to remove your organisation from the category of sqatter.”
       
      Antagonised by the move, Hial today obtained an interim interdict from Lord Armstrong at the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
       
      The court order prevents the grazing committee taking any action to interfere with the occupation of land by tenants at Stornoway Airport or do anything which might risk the safe operation of Stornoway Airport.
       
      Crofters previously urged Hial to meet with them to discuss how the airport can continue to run alongside crofting activity.
       
      Inglis Lyon, Hial managing director said: “We are disappointed that the actions of the Melbost and Brahanhuie grazings committee have required us to seek an interim interdict.
       
      “We have said all along that our intention in developing this land has always been to facilitate the creation of affordable, high-quality homes that would benefit local people.
       
      “Our priority at Hial is to maintain safety and airport operations and the order issued today preserves the status quo until the appeal is heard.”
       
      According to Mr Lyon, Hial has sought to “engage constructively with the grazings committee and has offered to meet with all involved to arrive at a mutually agreeable solution.
       
      “Whilst, to date, this offer has not been accepted, it nonetheless remains open.”
       
       
       
       
      http://www.hebrides-news.com/stornoway-airport-ownership-row-10519.html
    • By ChrisJones
      Saturday 27th an armed man attempted entry to a synagogue outside of San Diego, California. According to eyewitnesses he was armed with an "AR style assault rifle" and 3 people have been injured and one has been confirmed dead.
      AR15's are illegal in California. The shooter was engaged by the synagogue's armed security which in this case was an off duty border patrol agent. The shooter fled the scene and gave himself up to LE.
      The narrative of this story began as one of gun control but has quickly shifted to that of a hate crime now that more details have come to light. The article is from CNN but pretty factual with what's known at this time. The shooter has broken numerous laws and the bad guy with the gun was stopped by a good guy with a gun.
       
    • By ChrisJones
      It's official. American socialist icon Bernie Sanders has officially declared that he's running for commander in chief in 2020. He's raised around $5.9 million from more than 220,000 donors in the first 24 hours, which has trumped even the Donald at this point. Many of those donors are set up for recurring donations that are set to net $600,000 a month.
      Last time around there were allegations of hamstringing as despite Bernie's popularity with the American electorate as he conceded to Hillary Clinton despiting winning many of the primaries by a large margin. Looking at Hillary's disasterous performance in 2016 it'll be interesting to see whether Sanders remains an independent candidate or goes full Democrat as the group whittles itself down to a frontrunner.
       

×
×
  • Create New...