tandors 888 Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 From what i've read it was believed to be a jew all along but wasn't confirmed to prevent anti jewish riots. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stabba 10,745 Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 Several people claimed to have investigated the case and named the killer. Everyone different. Never got proved then and won't be proved now. Odd's are there will be a book to follow very shortly . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MickC 1,825 Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 The Juwes are The men that Will not Be blamed For nothing. The three Juwes being Jubela,Jubelo and Jubelum the murderers of Hiram Abiff, were executed in the old Masonic Legend. There throats cut across,there bodies torn open, there internal organs deftly removed and arranged around the corpses in there final resting places and finally there entrails 'thrown over the Left shoulder' . Makes you wonder, I'd say a cover up . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dare 1,103 Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 Better hope they never find the body then if planning to get rid of someone lol. How many years later and able to use dna bloody mad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Brigzy 1,298 Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 Several people claimed to have investigated the case and named the killer. Everyone different. Never got proved then and won't be proved now. Odd's are there will be a book to follow very shortly .[/quote Book is being published September nine. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lanesra 4,007 Posted September 7, 2014 Report Share Posted September 7, 2014 The Ultimate Who Dun It . . Went On A Jack The Ripper Tour About 20 yrs Ago & It Was Quite Good . . I'm Down In London End Off The Month Might Go Again & See If They Now Name Him As Kosminsky ? . . Though I Doubt It As They May Will Lose Custom Givin Its The "Don't Know" That Fasinates People !! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hareydave 1,214 Posted September 8, 2014 Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 Aaron the ripper it don't have the same ring to it 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted September 8, 2014 Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 Hmmm. A 120 year old shawl, supposedly found BY the body of Catherine Eddowes bought in an auction? Not exactly what I'd call damning evidence. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hareydave 1,214 Posted September 8, 2014 Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 was good enough for bill clinton Quote Link to post Share on other sites
socks 32,253 Posted September 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 Hmmm. A 120 year old shawl, supposedly found BY the body of Catherine Eddowes bought in an auction? Not exactly what I'd call damning evidence. They have confirmed both sets of DNA by testing living relatives ....... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RemyBolt 420 Posted September 8, 2014 Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 I have mixed feelings about this. 1. We know whose the killer. Congratulations. Well done us. 2. We know whose the killer. Well punishment will be...un-severe. Banished to death....oh wait..... 3. Is DNA on one murder victim evidence enough that it was the same person that killed the others? 4. There are similarities to the whole Jack the Ripper murders, but no actual evidence to link them to the same person. 5. Jack the Ripper was interesting because we didn't know who he was. Harold Shipman killed ten times more people, but we know who he is. Mystery Murders become romanticised. Aaron the Ripper has ruined that. 6. Will more clothing be checked for DNA for more evidence? Very mixed. It would be like finding the Yeti. Turns out it is a hairy white gorilla that eats yellow snow. Not get back to work. Life continues. The interesting debate and mixed opinions on it all become twisted and ruined by facts. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MickC 1,825 Posted September 8, 2014 Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 I would have thought that DNA on a shawl only proves that he had a romantic session with the victim,it does not prove he was the killer . Plenty of cases were DNA at the scene was not enough to convict a person of murder. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
socks 32,253 Posted September 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 I would have thought that DNA on a shawl only proves that he had a romantic session with the victim,it does not prove he was the killer . Plenty of cases were DNA at the scene was not enough to convict a person of murder. Yes but added to all the other stuff it pretty much points to him ........ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MickC 1,825 Posted September 8, 2014 Report Share Posted September 8, 2014 I would have thought that DNA on a shawl only proves that he had a romantic session with the victim,it does not prove he was the killer . Plenty of cases were DNA at the scene was not enough to convict a person of murder. Yes but added to all the other stuff it pretty much points to him ........ It does point the finger at him I agree but with her being a prostitute I wonder if anymore DNA was found at the scene, the shawl would probably have been like a plasterers radio lol . 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.