Born Hunter 17,780 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Besides, who said anything about changing history? I interpreted the question to mean that the baby would grow up to become a future equivalent of Hitler, not that we have gone back in time and been given the opportunity to kill the actual Hitler. So no changing history, simply changing the future... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
socks 32,253 Posted September 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 I said "embarrassingly" sinister socks. Self explanatory really.........embarrassing and sinister that anyone would put a question (psychological assessment or not) on a hunting forum asking who could kill a baby in an absolutely impossible situation that (I can categorically guarantee) will never happen. personally I would assume anyone putting this question to paper or asking this question must be out of their mind or psychologically unstable. So firstly I was sinister and now I am psychologically unstable. Luckily vixen people with far more qualifications in such matters than you deemed me to be ok to look after people like yourself in this country. No its ok there is no need to thank me it was my pleasure ........ Fukc me I thought it was a simple enough question that was as the title said thought provoking .... Now where did I put my special tablets .......... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 13,103 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Give wee Adolf a cut throat razor and let nature take it's course Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bobcullen79 1,495 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 Give wee Adolf a cut throat razor and let nature take it's course Dont be silly, he wouldnt have had a muzzy at that age. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 30,217 Posted September 5, 2014 Report Share Posted September 5, 2014 For me it would have to be let the baby live, because you couldn't know what would happen if you changed history. But you WOULD know what would happen thats what the question is all about !!! No mate, thats the whole point. If you change history there would be no guarantee it will be for the better, it could get 10x worse. Maybe i didnt understand the question but i thought the long and the short of it was if a baby was going to grow up a sick evil killer would you cull it.........i dont really see where history comes into it at all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NEWKID 27,211 Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 What a question Ken. To kill or not to kill ?... You sick sick man lol... Ffs it's hitler kill the little b*****d!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hareydave 1,214 Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 I said "embarrassingly" sinister socks. Self explanatory really.........embarrassing and sinister that anyone would put a question (psychological assessment or not) on a hunting forum asking who could kill a baby in an absolutely impossible situation that (I can categorically guarantee) will never happen. personally I would assume anyone putting this question to paper or asking this question must be out of their mind or psychologically unstable. So firstly I was sinister and now I am psychologically unstable. Luckily vixen people with far more qualifications in such matters than you deemed me to be ok to look after people like yourself in this country. No its ok there is no need to thank me it was my pleasure ........ Fukc me I thought it was a simple enough question that was as the title said thought provoking .... Now where did I put my special tablets .......... hint of a jack Nicholson speech going on there socks Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 I don't think there's anything sinister about this thread. It's a hypothetical question about what someone would do in a hypothetical situation. It's one routinely asked in psych evaluations for certain jobs. I personally wouldn't, but I can see the reasoning behind the other train of thought. This is nowhere near as sinister IMO as the "god" thread where the same old zealots are trying to brainwash you by repeating ad nauseam supposedly old texts written by unknown people, and simply won't accept anyone could possibly have an opinion different to theirs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 I don't think there's anything sinister about this thread. It's a hypothetical question about what someone would do in a hypothetical situation. It's one routinely asked in psych evaluations for certain jobs. I personally wouldn't, but I can see the reasoning behind the other train of thought. This is nowhere near as sinister IMO as the "god" thread where the same old zealots are trying to brainwash you by repeating ad nauseam supposedly old texts written by unknown people, and simply won't accept anyone could possibly have an opinion different to theirs. well we do share 50% of our genes with bananas Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 47,254 Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 I do......in the pants area !! 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 listen to yourself walshie your the one with the narrow mind,trying to put down people with faith your the one thats stuck to your ways an then you have the cheek to slag people with faith your a hypocrite mate. yhe god thread is about a debate an has evolved lol into peoples opinions on life.whats your problem dont want people having there opinion,i like to hear other people if you dont tut tut an dont look simple Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 listen to yourself walshie your the one with the narrow mind,trying to put down people with faith your the one thats stuck to your ways an then you have the cheek to slag people with faith your a hypocrite mate. yhe god thread is about a debate an has evolved lol into peoples opinions on life.whats your problem dont want people having there opinion,i like to hear other people if you dont tut tut an dont look simple Nothing hypocritical here mate. I don't try to wear people down till they agree with me. As said before, my problem is with you and your attitude. I'm not putting anyone down with faith. Stop trying to twist everything to your own agenda. and most of all...stop being so f***ing tedious frazdog. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 13,103 Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 listen to yourself walshie your the one with the narrow mind,trying to put down people with faith your the one thats stuck to your ways an then you have the cheek to slag people with faith your a hypocrite mate. yhe god thread is about a debate an has evolved lol into peoples opinions on life.whats your problem dont want people having there opinion,i like to hear other people if you dont tut tut an dont look simple Nothing hypocritical here mate. I don't try to wear people down till they agree with me. As said before, my problem is with you and your attitude. I'm not putting anyone down with faith. Stop trying to twist everything to your own agenda. and most of all...stop being so f***ing tedious frazdog. I think barking mad is more correct that tedious Walsh lmao Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flipper_Al 1,012 Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 Russell's Teapot.... If you haven't read about it google it Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulf 820 Posted September 6, 2014 Report Share Posted September 6, 2014 I do......in the pants area !! you mean its yellow ? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.