Jump to content

Agricultural Ties


Recommended Posts

We're still looking for our perfect rural house to buy and leave the hubbub of surburbia behind us.

 

A smallholding would be ideal. We don't want to farm anything as such, but a decent veg garden, orchard and a few chickens, ducks and geese would be perfect.

 

I've seen a few that fit the bill but are subject to agricultural ties. I've read about them and it's a minefield of differing information.

 

Could anyone explain (in townie terms :laugh: ) firstly what you would need to comply with the conditions, and secondly how hard it would be to get these conditions lifted? We're prepared for a bit of hassle to get them lifted, but if its going to be a long drawn out affair or nearly impossible, we'll keep looking elsewhere.

 

Thanks for any info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The terms of an agricultural-user restriction (or agricultural tie) can be daunting. They usually require that ‘the occupation of the property is limited to a person solely or mainly employed, or last employed, in the locality in agriculture as defined in Section 290(i) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1971, or in forestry (including any dependents of such a person residing with him) or a widow or widower of such a person’. So it would be possible to comply with the tie if a would-be purchaser had previously worked in agriculture or has been married to someone who was.

Properties with such a tie can be difficult to sell and often only do at a discounted price. ‘People are naturally put off when they discover a property has an agricultural tie. It’s an instant barrier. Potential buyers are scared because they don’t understand it or what it entails,’ believes Winkworth’s Chris Baker. The properties are rarely large and the tie will have been made as a condition when planning permission was given to build a home on agricultural land.

Although there’s unlikely to be a reduction in price for an agricultural property with extensive acreage, there could be discounts of up to 30% for anything under 100 acres. ‘The amount of discount depends on how much land is with it,’ says David Cross, director of Savills’ Salisbury office.

‘The smaller the amount of land, the greater the discount.’ Kevin Prince from Strutt & Parker’s Salisbury office adds: ‘Over the past 10 years, we have found that, due to the shortage of good properties with more than 100 acres, having an agricultural tie with this amount of land doesn’t affect the price. It’s once you get below 20-30 acres that it becomes an issue.’

It’s not all doom, however-it is possible to get the tie lifted, if you can prove that no one has been working in agriculture for the past 10 years. If the council agrees, it will issue a ‘certificate of lawfulness’, which means you’re no longer in breach of the condition. However, if it’s discovered you’re in breach before that time, you can be fined. The tie could also be lifted if you’re selling the property and can demonstrate that there’s no longer any requirement for agricultural work on the holding and that there have been no prospective purchasers over a specified time limit, agreed with the council.

Another option may be to see if the council will accept other uses as fulfilling the tie. According to Mr Prince, planning-policy guidance has become much friendlier to horses: ‘Councils are increasingly prepared to extend an agricultural tie to equestrian use

Read more at http://www.countrylife.co.uk/news/property-news/country-houses-for-sale-and-property-news/buying-property-with-an-agricultural-tie#3Wm6BpD5lxxrhE5L.99

Link to post
Share on other sites

The terms of an agricultural-user restriction (or agricultural tie) can be daunting. They usually require that ‘the occupation of the property is limited to a person solely or mainly employed, or last employed, in the locality in agriculture as defined in Section 290(i) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1971, or in forestry (including any dependents of such a person residing with him) or a widow or widower of such a person’. So it would be possible to comply with the tie if a would-be purchaser had previously worked in agriculture or has been married to someone who was.

Properties with such a tie can be difficult to sell and often only do at a discounted price. ‘People are naturally put off when they discover a property has an agricultural tie. It’s an instant barrier. Potential buyers are scared because they don’t understand it or what it entails,’ believes Winkworth’s Chris Baker. The properties are rarely large and the tie will have been made as a condition when planning permission was given to build a home on agricultural land.

Although there’s unlikely to be a reduction in price for an agricultural property with extensive acreage, there could be discounts of up to 30% for anything under 100 acres. ‘The amount of discount depends on how much land is with it,’ says David Cross, director of Savills’ Salisbury office.

‘The smaller the amount of land, the greater the discount.’ Kevin Prince from Strutt & Parker’s Salisbury office adds: ‘Over the past 10 years, we have found that, due to the shortage of good properties with more than 100 acres, having an agricultural tie with this amount of land doesn’t affect the price. It’s once you get below 20-30 acres that it becomes an issue.’

It’s not all doom, however-it is possible to get the tie lifted, if you can prove that no one has been working in agriculture for the past 10 years. If the council agrees, it will issue a ‘certificate of lawfulness’, which means you’re no longer in breach of the condition. However, if it’s discovered you’re in breach before that time, you can be fined. The tie could also be lifted if you’re selling the property and can demonstrate that there’s no longer any requirement for agricultural work on the holding and that there have been no prospective purchasers over a specified time limit, agreed with the council.

Another option may be to see if the council will accept other uses as fulfilling the tie. According to Mr Prince, planning-policy guidance has become much friendlier to horses: ‘Councils are increasingly prepared to extend an agricultural tie to equestrian use

Read more at http://www.countrylife.co.uk/news/property-news/country-houses-for-sale-and-property-news/buying-property-with-an-agricultural-tie#3Wm6BpD5lxxrhE5L.99[/size]

 

Joe67 got banned for that!! Copycutnpaste king!! :laugh:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The terms of an agricultural-user restriction (or agricultural tie) can be daunting. They usually require that ‘the occupation of the property is limited to a person solely or mainly employed, or last employed, in the locality in agriculture as defined in Section 290(i) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1971, or in forestry (including any dependents of such a person residing with him) or a widow or widower of such a person’. So it would be possible to comply with the tie if a would-be purchaser had previously worked in agriculture or has been married to someone who was.

Properties with such a tie can be difficult to sell and often only do at a discounted price. ‘People are naturally put off when they discover a property has an agricultural tie. It’s an instant barrier. Potential buyers are scared because they don’t understand it or what it entails,’ believes Winkworth’s Chris Baker. The properties are rarely large and the tie will have been made as a condition when planning permission was given to build a home on agricultural land.

Although there’s unlikely to be a reduction in price for an agricultural property with extensive acreage, there could be discounts of up to 30% for anything under 100 acres. ‘The amount of discount depends on how much land is with it,’ says David Cross, director of Savills’ Salisbury office.

‘The smaller the amount of land, the greater the discount.’ Kevin Prince from Strutt & Parker’s Salisbury office adds: ‘Over the past 10 years, we have found that, due to the shortage of good properties with more than 100 acres, having an agricultural tie with this amount of land doesn’t affect the price. It’s once you get below 20-30 acres that it becomes an issue.’

It’s not all doom, however-it is possible to get the tie lifted, if you can prove that no one has been working in agriculture for the past 10 years. If the council agrees, it will issue a ‘certificate of lawfulness’, which means you’re no longer in breach of the condition. However, if it’s discovered you’re in breach before that time, you can be fined. The tie could also be lifted if you’re selling the property and can demonstrate that there’s no longer any requirement for agricultural work on the holding and that there have been no prospective purchasers over a specified time limit, agreed with the council.

Another option may be to see if the council will accept other uses as fulfilling the tie. According to Mr Prince, planning-policy guidance has become much friendlier to horses: ‘Councils are increasingly prepared to extend an agricultural tie to equestrian use

Read more at http://www.countrylife.co.uk/news/property-news/country-houses-for-sale-and-property-news/buying-property-with-an-agricultural-tie#3Wm6BpD5lxxrhE5L.99[/size]

 

Joe67 got banned for that!! Copycutnpaste king!! :laugh:

 

bollocks to typing all that when its already done :laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...