BigBrianBorou 35 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 an mushy ive highlighted your beleif evoloution above an what science means,an your still havnt put any decent info to back it up which leads me to think,your just passive little man whos made up his mind on what other people say without,checking it out,what does that say about you,not much mate Link to post Share on other sites
Onlyworkmatters 1,584 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 Lads...... move away from your f***ing computers 1 Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 12,925 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 Lmao of yes i am short lol just see my title pmsl and you are a blind Joey but I'll go with Jesus and turn your other cheek...... And whap my cock across it lol Link to post Share on other sites
Hareydave 1,214 Posted August 17, 2014 Author Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 and another thing, i showed a tree that was dated at 10,000 years plus old dated by science, you said no thats wrong carbon dating is unreliable, you then say a tree has been dated by science at 4000 years old to prove your creation theory, they found the oldest clock in the world in Scotland few years back 10,000 years old....still works too lol Link to post Share on other sites
General lee 979 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 I'm no scientist but I'm pretty sure carbon dating is flawed and I saw once a scientist showing how layers of earth had gatherd over thousands of years and how this was totally reliable way of dating objects that had been dug up placing some over 20 thousand years old and there was a leaf throu several layers of sediment meaning the leaf had landed on the ground and lasted over 3 thousand years it was just more proof of the unreliabilaty of scientific methods of dating I believe in god and because some people don't doesn't shake my faith atall 1 Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 as stated the thread was a debate creation vs evoloution,alot of ramblings but no evidence,i had to explain your evo religon,now has anyone any evidence for evoloution,im all ears well get your ears around this Link to post Share on other sites
delswal 3,819 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 paulas that graph is tripe mate,google oldest tree in world an it will be the one I said above, World's Oldest Living Tree -- 9550 years old -- Discovered In Sweden -- ScienceDaily. World's Oldest Living Tree -- 9550 years old -- Discovered In Sweden. Summary: The world's oldest recorded tree is a 9,550 year old spruce in the Dalarna province of Sweden. …seems Paulus was correct ……..i just googled as you advised BBB and the result proved Paulus to be correct ?? Link to post Share on other sites
BigBrianBorou 35 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 mate your lying cause googling,worlds oldest tree,an a bristle cone pine tree from califirnias white mountain,it is 4500 years old the oldest non clonal tree in world,so stop lying mate Link to post Share on other sites
delswal 3,819 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 mate your lying cause googling,worlds oldest tree,an a bristle cone pine tree from califirnias white mountain,it is 4500 years old the oldest non clonal tree in world,so stop lying mate why would i lie you fool ? anybody who googles will see it you buffoon Link to post Share on other sites
BigBrianBorou 35 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 so is your google diff than mine,i typed in WORLDS OLDEST TREE an mine stated above was first,an the rest of the results mentioned,nothing of paulas graph mate,so someone is lying an its not me Link to post Share on other sites
BigBrianBorou 35 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 mate I found that study of that tree,an they used carbon dating to date it but hold on they didnt date a tree they dated cones found on the highest part of mountain,cmon man you said it was a tree they dated an they used a known flawed system carbon dating,why did they not use the tryd an tested way counting the rings,like the valid eg I gave you above Link to post Share on other sites
Guest ragumup Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 (edited) My point is the god of the bible is evil he ordered condoned or committed killings himself , He killed the whole planet because they were bad that's includes all babies,& children plus all animals and what did it solve there's still bad people today ... He killed all the firstborn males in Egypt so how is it justice to kill the kids of people rather than directly punish the people themselves its not the babies fault is it ? He ordered Moses to tell the Levites to kill their neighbours friends family members and three thousand people died. Then god blessed them for it ! God told people to kill their own family member if they suggest worshiping other gods Need I go on ? and no its wasn't justice how is killing children justice ....that's my point . Edited August 17, 2014 by ragumup Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 mate I found that study of that tree,an they used carbon dating to date it but hold on they didnt date a tree they dated cones found on the highest part of mountain,cmon man you said it was a tree they dated an they used a known flawed system carbon dating,why did they not use the tryd an tested way counting the rings,like the valid eg I gave you above and the chromosomes that prove we evolved ?? Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 mate I found that study of that tree,an they used carbon dating to date it but hold on they didnt date a tree they dated cones found on the highest part of mountain,cmon man you said it was a tree they dated an they used a known flawed system carbon dating,why did they not use the tryd an tested way counting the rings,like the valid eg I gave you above because the tree is of the type where the main trunk dies off and another one grows the root system spawns the trees, like roses, if you use your method then the rose bush will only ever be a year old but the roots could be older than you Link to post Share on other sites
Tiercel 6,986 Posted August 17, 2014 Report Share Posted August 17, 2014 (edited) As previously stated I am agnostic. and having read all this thread there is absolutely nothing in it that has changed my mind. Being agnostic means I have an open mind and I am willing to listen to reasonable argument. BBB, if anything you have lowered the god theory in my mind. Rake was right, you are a Zealot, but to make it worse you are an uneducated Zealot. You take any information, that suits your cause and present it as a fact to try and prove your case. Any material that is presented to you that does not support your cause you conveniently ignore the question or answer with a question. I know a few born again Christians and none are as Zealous as you. Anyone's faith is between them and their god, the fact that you decry other religions just shows me how little tolerance you have of other faiths. That to me is not a Christian attitude, but the attitude of a Zealot who thinks they are right and no one else can be. I believe in Christian principles such as tolerance, love and living my life in a good way. Yet I do not feel that I must worship a god to do that. People who feel the need to publicise their good Christian faith are for want of better word,, exhibitionists. TC Edited August 17, 2014 by tiercel 6 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts