frazdog 252 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 lad im just putting the facts out there im not doing nothing of sort,these are the scientists you wanted to hear,this is le monte,an top evo scientist this is what he said about archeoptrex,the perching bird I'd like to start off by sharing a few quotes from evolutionists. This "argument from authority" is a much-hated tactic that creationists sometimes use, but alas, it reveals the truth that not all qualified scientists look at Archae (abbreviated for this article) in the same light. I'll start with ardent evolutionist Pierre Lecomte du Nouy: "We are not even authorized to consider the exceptional case of archaeopteryx as a true link. By link, we mean a necessary stage of transition between classes such as reptiles and birds, or between smaller groups. An animal displaying characteristics belonging to two different groups cannot be treated as a true link as long as the intermediary stages have not been found, and as long as the mechanisms of transition remain unknown." Human Destiny (New York: Longmaus, Green and Co., 1947), quoted in: Hank Hanegraaff, The Face That Demonstrates the Farce of Evolution (Nashville: Word, 1998), 37. Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,763 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 LOL, another creationist link pretending to talk science. For a chimp, 'Lucy' had skeletal features not seen in apes but more similar to humans....... Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,763 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 (edited) And you're quoting a Christian man that was anything BUT a 'top evo scientist' from the 40's, a time before the great understanding of DNA and genetics that we have today was available and which has also helped to understand the mechanism of evolution. Edited November 21, 2014 by Born Hunter Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 lad le monte is well known so you dont trust your own evoloutionists,it only had 40% of skeleton,so which parts were like human,bearing in mind it was 3 ft tall an weighed 40 kilos Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,763 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 He was not a fooking evolutionary scientist! He was known for his work in physics and philosophy! He believed in evolution but believed it divine and no natural mechanism was sufficient to explain it. All these 'top scientists' you creationists throw about have rarely contributed anything of significance to the area of evolutionary biology other than their opinion............. all too often biased by their spiritual beliefs! And very often dead and buried having not seen the great knowledge of biology we have today. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 so your telling me dna an genetics prove evoloution,how do you figure bh¿ Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 your saying biology an genetics,here is a bioligist "Paleontologists have tried to turn Archaeopteryx into an earth-bound, feathered dinosaur," Feduccia says. "But it's not. It is a bird, a perching bird. And no amount of 'paleobabble' is going to change that." Allan Feduccia, Professor of biology at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "Archaeopteryx: Early Bird Catches a Can of Worms", Science, Vol. 259, 5 February 1993, p. 764 Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,763 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 I've not said anything proves evolution! But our understanding of genetics now have supported evolution theory and not one single piece of evidence can be produced to counter evolution theory despite these great breakthroughs in tech and understanding. And f**k it, I'm done. You wouldn't accept it even if I had a friggin cave monkey to dissect in front of you! As long as you keep reading your biased creationist 'science' you'll never take an objective view. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,763 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 I haven't got the will to keep discrediting your claims. Crack the f**k on. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Share Posted November 21, 2014 well lad its about the evidence,an the facts state your two eg to be proven untrue, I interested in the recent genetic info you talk about,do you want to share with me bh? Link to post Share on other sites
socks 32,253 Posted November 23, 2014 Report Share Posted November 23, 2014 Doesn't the fact that the human race is getting taller and things like our little toes are getting smaller point towards the fact we are evolving ??? ........ Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted November 23, 2014 Report Share Posted November 23, 2014 haha Link to post Share on other sites
socks 32,253 Posted November 23, 2014 Report Share Posted November 23, 2014 What's funny fraz ??? ......... Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted November 23, 2014 Report Share Posted November 23, 2014 thats interesting socks,but not to be confused with macro evo lol were did you get them facts socks? Link to post Share on other sites
bobcullen79 1,495 Posted November 23, 2014 Report Share Posted November 23, 2014 What's funny fraz ??? ......... Your shrinking little toes? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts