God

[paulus 26]

dog =canine cat =feline kinds

 

your trying to lure me down the path of everything is related from the same ancestor when everyone knows

 

what do you get when these pairs breed

 

human man human woman =human baby

 

feline tiger an tigress = feline baby

 

canine dog an bitch = canine pup

 

 

so bh why would animals(kids when you hear millions of years ago you no a fairytale is starting long ago an far away)millions of yrs ago be able to produce other than there kind when us evolved animals cant do it now?

 

think about that

god and human woman = human man

[frazdog 252]

a sycamore,a chestnut,a pine are all species of a tree,there not gona produce a skunk plant haha

 

im heading lamping,so il catch up later,iff anyone can show me evidence of macro evo,origin of man,supposedley I would love to see it peace out brothers lol

[paulus 26]

a sycamore,a chestnut,a pine are all species of a tree,there not gona produce a skunk plant haha

 

im heading lamping,so il catch up later,iff anyone can show me evidence of macro evo,origin of man,supposedley I would love to see it peace out brothers lol

lamping! its not dark yet or do you use a black filter

[frazdog 252]

haha its an hours drive away paulas,have you not checked out your et theory,beam me up paulas haha

[paulus 26]

haha its an hours drive away paulas,have you not checked out your et theory,beam me up paulas haha

you mean my god was a man theory that is backed up by the bible

[frazdog 252]

you keep telling yourself that paulas,it still dont prove your alien invented us crap,cause were did aliens come from,aw I forgot they evolved before us,whistle haha

[gnasher16 30,274]

While i accept im just a dumb cockney with nowhere near the understanding you boys have......i cant see how this is such a difficult question to answer......and being something ive also asked in the past i keep coming back to this topic every 5 minutes to see what the answer is so f***ing hurry up and come up with one for crying out loud !!!!

 

Macro is the change above the level of species if im not wrong......and a legitimate scientific term.......so whats the hold up on the answer i dont get it ?

Edited November 20, 2014 by gnasher16

[paulus 26]

you keep telling yourself that paulas,it still dont prove your alien invented us crap,cause were did aliens come from,aw I forgot they evolved before us,whistle haha

your mixing me up with deswal mate. you brain is frazzled

[paulus 26]

you keep telling yourself that paulas,it still dont prove your alien invented us crap,cause were did aliens come from,aw I forgot they evolved before us,whistle haha

SPACE at a guess

[frazdog 252]

yes gnash but people on here cant answer the q

 

macro is a scientific THEORY not fact an never will be

[paulus 26]

yes gnash but people on here cant answer the q

 

macro is a scientific THEORY not fact an never will be

but is not God also a theory as the facts are not provable

[frazdog 252]

yes paulas an I admit that,

 

but these folk cant admit there in same boat its just a theory,

 

they cant admit it so that tells you something

 

an plus my taxpayers money is not getting used to teach our primary school children something that their saying is fact,which is complete bull,an leads children down a morally destructive path.

[Truther 1,579]

Good luck with the lamping Fraz lol.

 

What about this one, read it a couple of years ago so might not be spot on now.

 

Scientists wanted to study a rare eye condition in humans, very rare genetic fault that if i remember right meant no pigment in the iris, not sure how it affected sight now though? Because its so rare in humans they couldn't find many subjects, and you can't just start dissecting human eyes anyway, so they turned to fruit flies which also have the same genetic fault, still rare in fruit flies, but they can breed millions of them in no time and get subjects. Eventually they pinned the fault down, it was on "strand L11" of the fruit flies DNA, the surprising thing was it was in the same place in human DNA, strand L11? Now i don't know what that proves, if anything? but it seems a bit strange that we share a genetic fault with a fruit fly, and the defective gene sits in the same place in both sets of DNA?

[paulus 26]

yes paulas an I admit that,

 

but these folk cant admit there in same boat its just a theory,

 

they cant admit it so that tells you something

 

an plus my taxpayers money is not getting used to teach our primary school children something that their saying is fact,which is complete bull,an leads children down a morally destructive path.

kettle, pot.black springs to mind as thats exactly what the god crew have been doing for thousands of years

[Born Hunter 17,788]

Macro is the change above the level of species if im not wrong......and a legitimate scientific term.......so whats the hold up on the answer i dont get it ?

Anything above the species level... okay that's a definition.

 

So a wolf like species evolving into a fox like species would, by your definition, be an example of a creationists 'macro evolution'? It is after all a change in genus, which is above the species level.

 

It's also something I'm led to believe that creationists accept as possible through evolution!

 

Now there is a conundrum...