God

[mushroom 12,926]

What about seals fuucking penguins then?? :laugh:

[frazdog 252]

we dont want to hear about your porn collection,mushy,keep it clean,potty mouth lol

[paulus 26]

of course its not faith paulas,you can see millioneth of a second you cant see billions of years.

 

the eg you give of a desert forming over a billion years,think about it paulas a billion years,so if our landed changed to a desert over a billion years,now that is a astronomical length of time a very slow change,in climate,you think that would make say a broc evolve into what,excatly,you think they would change into a different animal over time cause the climate has very slowly changed to a warmer climate,that doesnt make any sense paulas,why an how would an an animal make a drastic change like that,when it has no reason to,you need to explain pailulas it doesnt make sense

and your the one going on about hundreds of billions of years ago when the earth was molten metals typical creationist, use the science when it fits the book, bend it, if it only slightly fits and ignore or discredit anything that can not be made to fit

[paulus 26]

of course its not faith paulas,you can see millioneth of a second you cant see billions of years.

 

the eg you give of a desert forming over a billion years,think about it paulas a billion years,so if our landed changed to a desert over a billion years,now that is a astronomical length of time a very slow change,in climate,you think that would make say a broc evolve into what,excatly,you think they would change into a different animal over time cause the climate has very slowly changed to a warmer climate,that doesnt make any sense paulas,why an how would an an animal make a drastic change like that,when it has no reason to,you need to explain pailulas it doesnt make sense

so explain how an egg becomes a fish and then becomes an amphibian that lays an egg,

[mushroom 12,926]

Er not porn science fact google it pmsl

[paulus 26]

Men gave time a name and number mate, before that there was just day and night

dawn and dusk,midday,high noon all time, time is all around us, in front and behind

[paulus 26]

fraz https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=seals+f**k+penguins&spell=1

[frazdog 252]

no paulas I wasnt using it,i was using the evoloution timeline,that scientists said that happened,an you on fish now fish are not amphibians or reptiles paulas,what are you on about?

[paulus 26]

no paulas I wasnt using it,i was using the evoloution timeline,that scientists said that happened,an you on fish now fish are not amphibians or reptiles paulas,what are you on about?

tadpoles are wholly aquatic and if they did not grow into an amphibian would be classed as fish. we classify them as amphibian because of what they become not what they are, but like a caterpillar and a butterfly they evolve from one thing into another, the same as a single egg and sperm becomes a human,

[WILF 46,814]

They metamorphose actually, no evolution about it !!

[paulus 26]

They metamorphose actually, no evolution about it !!

they evolved to do that though

[Tiercel 6,986]

Just my way of seeing it. Is not evolution a consequence of time and change?

 

TC

[frazdog 252]

pauls fish are fish,nothing more nothing less,an thats,metamorphis not evoloution,sure metamorphis happens fast not slow so thats out yhe window,an a gestation period for a human pregancy is evoloution,ive heard it all now,im away with dogs for an hour

[paulus 26]

pauls fish are fish,nothing more nothing less,an thats,metamorphis not evoloution,sure metamorphis happens fast not slow so thats out yhe window,an a gestation period for a human pregancy is evoloution,ive heard it all now,im away with dogs for an hour

question, if we stuck you and an Eskimo in a freezer who do you think would be able to stay in there longer, then we stuck you and an aboriginal in a heated room again who would walk out last.

[paulus 26]

quite like this answer

 

Not that I have a specific answer to this very specific question or anything...

but this query appears a variant of an underlying question of the mechanics of evolution, in general. I always imply skepticism in such a query, a knee-jerk reaction, I'll admit.

There are an infinite number of such questions that can be posed, so the more appropriate response is to suggest that evariste become more intimate with evolution. Illustrating a specific pathway from a progenitor life form to a current one necessarily incorporates a lot of speculation, but comprehending the process, in general, doesn't.

Life is a (regular+random) response to the (periodic+random) environment. Uncountable trillions of these transactions yeild some truly inexplicable results, especially when one picks a single life form at a specific point in time. It's like asking the question, what exact series of dice rolls preceded the one I just made? I may not be able to do that, but I CAN tell you how a dice roll works in general.

So the 'answer' to this question is to enhance the question to the form 'How can evariste better understand the process of evolution', which is answerable.

I'm not being condescending, incidentally, even though it may sound so... I get the chicken/egg dichotomy thrown at me constantly from the fundamentalists on the fringe of my life and this is the way I respond.