Jump to content

Are We Our Own Worst Enemies?


Recommended Posts

After putting a post up inc photos of a couple of bass I caught on the fishing section,

It was pointed out that they looked under size ( they weren't which I showed by putting a tape beside them) photos are deceiving and can be misconstrued.

But topics would be boring IMO without the odd photo, I don't mind being pulled by people in the right way ( perhaps a pm), but by pointing out a potential issue for all to read are we not fuelling a fire which isn't even there.

I like most would never put a photo or thread up which would be damaging to myself or field sports, but if you see something which your concerned about wouldn't a quiet word be better than putting it on the post?

Edited by NEWKID
  • Like 16
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

After putting a post up inc photos of a couple of bass I caught on the fishing section, It was pointed out that they looked under size ( they weren't which I showed by putting a tape beside them) ph

You know when I said about you coming down for a day on the boat..... I've had a rethink on that one mate!! lol

I tell you one thing. If i'm ever lucky enough to catch a Barbel. There's gonna be a photo posted no matter how fu*king small it is.................   :laugh:

It was me that started it I think and I apologise if my post was taken in the wrong way. In fact I never said the fish was undersize - I simply asked if there is still a size limit and the discussion continued. Very soon it was clear the smaller fish was well over the size limit - which imo is good. However in the photo it is lying right next to the reel and using that as a guide, it did look short and that is the only reason I made any comment at all. I guess the reel is bigger than I thought.

 

No malice or mischief was intended. I guess I could have asked how long is the smaller fish, but as I new member I thought it better to just ask if there is still a size limit and leave it at that. I am a member of several angling forums and I guess I have been influenced by the posting behaviour on them about pictures that are any less than perfect regarding welfare and rules etc!

 

and yes - I will use a a PM next time I don't know why I didn' this time, as I moderate a local forum and use them all the time.I had nearly knocked myself out a few hours before, so I don't think my brain was fully functioning - perhaps that is why.

Edited by Lid
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

It was me that started it I think and I apologise if my post was taken in the wrong way. In fact I never said the fish was undersize - I simply asked if there is still a size limit and the discussion continued. Very soon it was clear the smaller fish was well over the size limit - which imo is good. However in the photo it is lying right next to the reel and using that as a guide, it did look short and that is the only reason I made any comment at all. I guess the reel is bigger than I thought.

 

No malice or mischief was intended. I guess I could have asked how long is the smaller fish, but as I new member I thought it better to just ask if there is still a size limit and leave it at that. I am a member of several angling forums and I guess I have been influenced by the posting behaviour on them about pictures that are any less than perfect regarding welfare and rules etc!

 

I don't think this was aimed at you mate. As stated, you simply asked a question. It is referring to the smart-alec who TOLD the OP how big the fish was - apparently without having the correct facts to hand. :thumbs:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It did look small next to the bucket and i will admit to thinking the same and thinking why the feck has a fisherman put that pic up? :icon_redface: ,but good to see it wasn't and hope it tasted as good as it looked :victory:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly this is not a dig at anyone, if I was that concerned I would PM.

 

The 2 comments made were perfectly acceptable, and trying to help/educate which is what this place should be about.

Maybe I should've put a note up saying fish over legal size limit, but would that draw attention to the way the photo looked.... Along the lines of shot and retrieved beside a hare?

I think we've just got to be careful what we post, but at the same time we need to be careful how we reply..

 

Hey ho, no harm done and they tasted bloody lovely lol

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know....trying so hard to catch fish your putting up tiddlers just to scare Socks.....lol

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...