Jump to content

Best Dslr & Lens For Action Shots?


Recommended Posts

Hi guys, looking for some advice on a new DSLR set up, I have a canon 350D but the RAW capabilities on it aren't there so I'm looking to upgrade, I've been looking at these...

 

Canon 5D mark iii

 

Nikon D800

 

Also a 300mm lens to go with it, it'll mainly be for action shot with the dogs in all light conditions and general photography, (I'll get a smaller lens for that though)

 

I'm no expert, but I've got no problem with learning more as I go, it is something that I'll be getting more into, so I want to start off with the right bit of kit for high quality images and ease of use

 

So what are you guys using and/or what do you recommend and why?

 

Regards TF

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You wasted that sparrowhawk with those shit pictures........ :laugh: :laugh: you need beating with that camera!

Why do you want to shoot in raw?

teach them to walk at heel don't tell me you're blaming your shite pics on your poor dogs??? :D

Posted Images

i have the 5d mkii and the 7d if its action shots then the 7d is the one as its a crop sensor and is quicker by 2 frames per second, couple this with an 70 - 200mm f2.8 IS USM lens and you wont go far wrong, the 5d mkiii has a full frame sensor so the shots will appear further away than with the 7d`s crop sensor if that makes sense, the 7d is also about a grand cheaper,

Link to post
Share on other sites

forgot to mention,rumour has it that canon are releasing the 7d mkii towards the end of this year and it will have some of the good features that the 5d mkiii has, so if you are intending to by new then personally i would wait and see how the new 7d mkii is received,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the reply paulus, the 64 focal points for low light conditions is something that caught my attention, due to being out at first and last light with the dogs a lot it would be a great feature I think.

Although I don't know weather it's worth the extra ££'s.

 

More googling needed I think!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the reply paulus, the 64 focal points for low light conditions is something that caught my attention, due to being out at first and last light with the dogs a lot it would be a great feature I think.

Although I don't know weather it's worth the extra ££'s.

 

More googling needed I think!

 

Just use the centre or side focal points in manual... More points is a nice to have but not necessary..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the reply paulus, the 64 focal points for low light conditions is something that caught my attention, due to being out at first and last light with the dogs a lot it would be a great feature I think.

Although I don't know weather it's worth the extra ££'s.

 

More googling needed I think!

my answer to that would be no, but i do prefer using the 5d over the 7d, the auto focus system on the 5d mkiii is light years ahead of the 7d, as is its ability to handle high ISO`s in low light conditions, if the 7d mkii adopts these abilities with its crop sensor and faster shutter speed then it will be some camera, the 5d can track a moving object within entering or leaving its focus points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you want to shoot in raw?

It is my understanding that RAW files allow you to "tweek" you're pictures so that you may be able to improve on the image if it's not quite right. Where as with JPEG it is already decided for you to an extent...

 

Or have I been misled? Lol

 

The more I look into it the more questions arise, so thought that I'd ask on here as there will be people using their DSLR set ups for the same purpose as me.

I know it's more down to the persons capabilities in handling the camera, that I can learn, but I would like to get the right camera for my needs first time and then get better with it.

 

Which camera & lens combo do you use yourself?

 

Regards TF

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to go down a price level from the 7D, but up from the 350D, consider the Canon 70D. A secondhand 50D or 60D is well worth considering too.

 

If you are relatively new to action photography (and I am no expert, believe me) then a good pair of zoom lenses will work with higher ISOs and then you can build up to better, faster and fixed lenses later.

 

I use a 50D with a Canon 17 - 85 and a Tamron 70 - 300 IS and here an sample shot with the bigger lens, albeit in good light (BTW that was in gallop). I had my right hand and forearm in plaster at the time too!

 

7336800842_36a6121eb7_b.jpg

 

Go here for much more help and advice :

 

I agree that you should use RAW + JPG. Then you can fix mistakes like this !

Edited by Lid
Link to post
Share on other sites

the 5d gives you the option of one touch raw it you require it, it also has has both cf and and an sd card slots, raw files are much larger and will fill the cameras buffer a lot faster than jpeg if your shooting a lot of shots very quickly even with a high speed pro cf card., bur raw is the way to go if you want the ultimate in post picture editing,

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 7D has the crop factor which does help with wildlife they are also really cheap 2nd hand sub £500 so very good value. Only downside is over iso800 there is noise.

 

As for a lens I would highly recommend the Canon 70-300L, it is light and compact (relatively) great IQ and stunning IS for under £1000

 

There is also the Canon 1DMKiv. I got one as it was cheaper than a new 5Diii and it has x1.3 crop factor, it does 10fps if you need it, the battery lasts forever, it is properly waterproof, AF is superior to a 7D by far and more than enough to get anything I have pointed it at sharp 95% of the time. It is big though but you soon get used to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lens....well....you get what you pay for. If you want tack sharp then go for the L series of lens. If you don't want tack sharp then get some other brand and slap it on the front. As for raw, well, i've spent my lifetime behind a camera and i've experiented with raw, and , to be honest, i now only shoot jpeg. Raw is over-rated IMO. Unless you're going real deep into things and trying to layer pics then there really is not need. You're just over-complicating things. You need to get top-class on the kit you're using first before experimenting with raw.

 

It all boils down to two things..how much you WANT to get good shots, and how much coin you've got to spend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...