marky b 309 Posted June 18, 2014 Report Share Posted June 18, 2014 (edited) The only tits and ass on here will be these. 3 pairs of tits ---- aint you seen total recall errrrrrrrrrrrrrrr nope well there a woman in it with......yup you guessed it 3 boobys lol Edited June 18, 2014 by marky b Quote Link to post Share on other sites
haymin 2,465 Posted June 18, 2014 Report Share Posted June 18, 2014 No smiley with that post Haymin .. just 4 white boxes with OIF44D wrote in them.. how did you no that ?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
haymin 2,465 Posted June 18, 2014 Report Share Posted June 18, 2014 Right just pressed that mark solve one of the posts goes different colour then at the top of the post it says best answer what's it all about ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Millet 4,497 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 No smiley with that post Haymin .. just 4 white boxes with OIF44D wrote in them.. how did you no that I know your smiley's are not working because i can see your post's.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RemyBolt 420 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 Wow this has really made a transition from the OP. I think the point was, if a person that likes the forum from the FB page is allowed to have their picture on the screen, and their picture is of a woman/girl in a bikini, why are the other members not allowed the same rights? This does seem to be a fair enquiry. The rules state NO: Nudity, see-through clothing, Lewd or provocative poses including close-ups of breasts, buttocks, etc So this would be open to interpretation of what a person thinks defines provocative POSES. So the direct translation of the rules would suggest that providing a person is not naked, not wearing see-through clothing (a self defeating act in itself), is not lewd pose or in a provocative pose, then it should be okay. Therefore the young girl in the bikini is more than entitled to have her picture up, because it does not fulfil any of the critera of the rules. Neither does it have any close ups of anything provocative. So, providing you opt for photos that are of a similar nature, e.g. clothed (a bikini should be fine, in theory), but not provocatively positioned, then you should be fine...as long as it's not copyrighted. I'm not making trouble, I'm just interpreting the rules and giving my view of it. Truth is, if your avatar is a woman in a bikini...I'm not sure the image would fit with a name like TOMO, Moxy, The Stig, Marky, or...dare I say it...IanB. Why not just have a picture of a successful hunt bag that you've gotten....which is why I don't have an avatar :-( I'm so rubbish haha. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
haymin 2,465 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 No smiley with that post Haymin .. just 4 white boxes with OIF44D wrote in them.. how did you no that I know your smiley's are not working because i can see your post's.. millet yir dain ma heed inn ?,I haven't a clue what yir on aboot my smilies are workin??) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
air gun ant 1,666 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 No members no forum No dickheads, no problem I like it. Look the forums been here for ten year, I'm sure losing ten, twenty or a hundred+ whining twat's with nothing better to do, than moan or troll....would...............................probably improve things. Ian can you tone the language down please. There may be younger members reading this. whats a twat????? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
johnny boy68 11,726 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 Wow this has really made a transition from the OP. I think the point was, if a person that likes the forum from the FB page is allowed to have their picture on the screen, and their picture is of a woman/girl in a bikini, why are the other members not allowed the same rights? This does seem to be a fair enquiry. The rules state NO: Nudity, see-through clothing, Lewd or provocative poses including close-ups of breasts, buttocks, etcSo this would be open to interpretation of what a person thinks defines provocative POSES. So the direct translation of the rules would suggest that providing a person is not naked, not wearing see-through clothing (a self defeating act in itself), is not lewd pose or in a provocative pose, then it should be okay. Therefore the young girl in the bikini is more than entitled to have her picture up, because it does not fulfil any of the critera of the rules. Neither does it have any close ups of anything provocative. So, providing you opt for photos that are of a similar nature, e.g. clothed (a bikini should be fine, in theory), but not provocatively positioned, then you should be fine...as long as it's not copyrighted. I'm not making trouble, I'm just interpreting the rules and giving my view of it. Truth is, if your avatar is a woman in a bikini...I'm not sure the image would fit with a name like TOMO, Moxy, The Stig, Marky, or...dare I say it...IanB. Why not just have a picture of a successful hunt bag that you've gotten....which is why I don't have an avatar :-( I'm so rubbish haha. After a mods job are you 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RemyBolt 420 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 whats a twat????? It's a Tawt that can only walk backwards....obviously!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RemyBolt 420 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 Wow this has really made a transition from the OP. I think the point was, if a person that likes the forum from the FB page is allowed to have their picture on the screen, and their picture is of a woman/girl in a bikini, why are the other members not allowed the same rights? This does seem to be a fair enquiry. The rules state NO: Nudity, see-through clothing, Lewd or provocative poses including close-ups of breasts, buttocks, etc So this would be open to interpretation of what a person thinks defines provocative POSES. So the direct translation of the rules would suggest that providing a person is not naked, not wearing see-through clothing (a self defeating act in itself), is not lewd pose or in a provocative pose, then it should be okay. Therefore the young girl in the bikini is more than entitled to have her picture up, because it does not fulfil any of the critera of the rules. Neither does it have any close ups of anything provocative. So, providing you opt for photos that are of a similar nature, e.g. clothed (a bikini should be fine, in theory), but not provocatively positioned, then you should be fine...as long as it's not copyrighted. I'm not making trouble, I'm just interpreting the rules and giving my view of it. Truth is, if your avatar is a woman in a bikini...I'm not sure the image would fit with a name like TOMO, Moxy, The Stig, Marky, or...dare I say it...IanB. Why not just have a picture of a successful hunt bag that you've gotten....which is why I don't have an avatar :-( I'm so rubbish haha. After a mods job are you HELL NO! I mod on 2 other websites. I'm just trying to work out how guys can get bikini women back as their avatars, but being sneaky enough to look good in the process haha Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Millet 4,497 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 (edited) whats a twat????? Apparently it's a pregnant Fish.. Edited June 19, 2014 by Millet Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 whats a twat????? Apparently it's a pregnant Fish.. i thought its what someone gave you for being a cnut Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Millet 4,497 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 I'm not a c**t but you are a vulva.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
thebiggerdog 160 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 I'm not a c**t but you are a vulva.. are we not allowed to say fanny anymore Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Matt 160 Posted June 19, 2014 Report Share Posted June 19, 2014 I'm not a c**t but you are a vulva.. are we not allowed to say fanny anymore 'Fan-hay' (as they say in Berkshire) is fine Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.