dogdown 1 Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 Im in the market for a scope for my .223 and came across the Hawke Endurance 30 IR SF which comes with a reticle designed for the tragectory of .223. Anyone got/tried this scope? My budget is about 300 golden tokens if anyone wants to suggest anything else suitable. Most shots taken around 150yards but occasional shots out to 300, most of this on the lamp after charlie. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
the scudd 82 Posted May 17, 2014 Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 hi mate i would not bother with anything hawk, get yourself a good meopta Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dogdown 1 Posted May 17, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 Thats what i expected! Looked attractive in the magazine, i will have a look at meopta. Anyone rate MTC scopes? I spoke to a local rifle builder today who said for a budget scope they aren't bad at all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
3175darren 1,100 Posted May 17, 2014 Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 Thats what i expected! Looked attractive in the magazine, i will have a look at meopta. Anyone rate MTC scopes? I spoke to a local rifle builder today who said for a budget scope they aren't bad at all.i had a hawke endurance IR 2.5-10-56 on my 223 and it did the job well, to be honest I might re-fit it,I shot plenty of foxes with it,I like them for small calibre's never tried one on anything bigger than 223 though Quote Link to post Share on other sites
irishnut 297 Posted May 18, 2014 Report Share Posted May 18, 2014 hawke does decent glass for the price, i had a hawke on my 222 and did a greta job. its not s&b quality, but it is 1/4 the price 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bbjaccov5 4 Posted May 18, 2014 Report Share Posted May 18, 2014 I like the MTC scopes better then the hawkes. Shot a few times with a endurance 3-12x56. The hawke was not nearly as clear as the mtc scopes i have seen! Gr Jacco Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hutchey 147 Posted May 18, 2014 Report Share Posted May 18, 2014 My hawke is good on both rimmy and 243 out yo over 250 yards easy. Not the best glass ever but for the price they are much better now than a few years ago 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bbjaccov5 4 Posted May 18, 2014 Report Share Posted May 18, 2014 My hawke is good on both rimmy and 243 out yo over 250 yards easy. Not the best glass ever but for the price they are much better now than a few years ago Fair to mention that the hawke i shot with is more then 5 years old. Gr Jacco Quote Link to post Share on other sites
oxo 441 Posted May 18, 2014 Report Share Posted May 18, 2014 As said have a look at Meopta Meopro, Burris Fullfield 11 or Nikon for the money you have, a lot better than MTC or Hawke. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
charlie caller 3,654 Posted May 21, 2014 Report Share Posted May 21, 2014 Get yourself a Nikon prostaff, with the BDC bullet drop compensator reticule, brilliant glass, and build quality, the BDC reticule is great and you can, get it spot on for your rifle, and all for around £160.00 a million times better than any MTC crap. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire dan 467 Posted May 28, 2014 Report Share Posted May 28, 2014 I have a redfield 4-12x40 with the accurange reticle on my hmr and its awesome really clear. The same scope as leaupold Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bart308 11 Posted May 29, 2014 Report Share Posted May 29, 2014 Had a hawke endurance and it was ok, but the optics faded early on at dusk. Now use weaver and bushnell elite and find them a lot better compared to the hawke for not a lot more £ than a new hawke. Hawke are a bit gimmicky over quality I think Quote Link to post Share on other sites
John Stott 202 Posted June 29, 2014 Report Share Posted June 29, 2014 I use three Hawkes, never an issue with any of them. The last few years has seen a fantastic range of better quality optics from them. Well priced as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Gloop 5 Posted June 30, 2014 Report Share Posted June 30, 2014 (edited) Spend the money on quality. If you can't afford new quality then buy secondhand quality. The distances you are looking to shoot to I would not use a cheap scope. I would always worry about accuracy. The adage, buy once buy right. I am always a bit bemused by people who use mildots, particularly at night.(probably my lack of experience). But with a lamp how long do you have to range find find on a moving target? Or is it just knowing your land? I just use point and squeeze and if I need a bit of holdover well, aim for the top of his back at 300 and the drop will have him. But that is me, and I do not have the years that some other s have. However, scope wise, good optics are always going to beat cheap optics. I would look at the Meopta, very good price and very good in low light, secondhand there are bargains to be had. I have one on my 243. I have had the following, HAWKE AGS Zeiss Leupold Meopta Mtc I also had access to a load of scopes to do a bit of a test for clarity once. The AGS did surprisingly well. it was an old model, not the stuff you can now buy. But spending my money, then the Meopta is what is on my main rig. It is not as good as those at the top but it is very close and head and shoulders above the rest. But that is of course my opinion and there will be 3 million others who will differ. Edited June 30, 2014 by Gloop Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.