Silversnake 1,099 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 they carnt lie in interview and tell you theyve got evidence when they havnt also your brief has to have a copy of evidence against you aswell unless caught bang to rights not guilty it all the way mate and by that caught in the act or with dead game Yes they can, and yes they do.... Plod will say regular they have witnesses in INITIAL interview there are way for police to manipulate the law the same as any one and they do. There sneaky liars wasteing time money and effort when some ones granny's getting beaten for a fiver! You can't run a hare but the government lets up boil lobsters alive force feed geese and keeps hens in cages. It's daft. Suggestion lets leave the dogs at home and forget the walk and go town get pissed up and batter some one at least then we only get a caution rather than a driving ban the dogs murdered the car destroyed lost job and huge fine. Don't add up when you get the hunt with 50 or more dogs left alone cos of contacts and aristocracy. The common non land owning man is targeted and has been. Hare coarsing law is only there to appease the rich and the animal activists. A few people give us a bad name but most of us mean no harm do no damage and enjoy watching our quarry in its surrounding as much as hunting them. Long ago would of been permissioned lurcher men that kept scroundrels away! I'm gonna shut up now as really pisses me of rant over and leave Charlie for the fox ! Quote Link to post
Silversnake 1,099 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 I like how you say we enjoy watching our quarry as much as hunting them. It is not understood how much most hunters love their quarry and the land they are part of. Keep the love hunters and things will change for our benefit! Quote Link to post
andy97 209 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 NO THEY CARNT they carnt tell you theyve got something that they havnt ill have you a friendly bet mate ring a brief up and ask same as if they said weve got dna evidence and they havnt you would get it thrown out in court even if yu admitted it They can. And they do. They told me I was free to go. No charges. Only taken in "to assist with enquiries". Then when I said right I'm going they threatened to arrest me and keep us in for the night at another station miles away. Then they lied about having video evidence. Then they lied about having witnesses. They will and do lie through their teeth. they can lie about witnesses but not video evidence or dna as said yor briefs must have been shite Quote Link to post
Gaz_1989 9,539 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 NO THEY CARNT they carnt tell you theyve got something that they havnt ill have you a friendly bet mate ring a brief up and ask same as if they said weve got dna evidence and they havnt you would get it thrown out in court even if yu admitted itThey can. And they do. They told me I was free to go. No charges. Only taken in "to assist with enquiries". Then when I said right I'm going they threatened to arrest me and keep us in for the night at another station miles away. Then they lied about having video evidence. Then they lied about having witnesses. They will and do lie through their teeth. they can lie about witnesses but not video evidence or dna as said yor briefs must have been shite What's the brief got to do with it? You sound like you haven't got a clue mate. I've been sat in an interview with plod IMPLYING that they have got video evidence and TELLING me point blank that they have got my footprints. Both were complete lies to prompt a confession. This is in the initial interview. No brief present as I wasn't guilty and I knew I wasn't. 4 Quote Link to post
DeerhoundLurcherMan 997 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 Shit solicitor, good solicitor, no solicitor, makes no difference. The police lie about evidence during interviews. Agreed a good solicitor will pull them apart if they try it on. But it doesn't stop the old bill lying in the first place... Got that T-shirt Next time run faster lol 3 Quote Link to post
andy97 209 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 NO THEY CARNT they carnt tell you theyve got something that they havnt ill have you a friendly bet mate ring a brief up and ask same as if they said weve got dna evidence and they havnt you would get it thrown out in court even if yu admitted itThey can. And they do. They told me I was free to go. No charges. Only taken in "to assist with enquiries". Then when I said right I'm going they threatened to arrest me and keep us in for the night at another station miles away. Then they lied about having video evidence. Then they lied about having witnesses. They will and do lie through their teeth. they can lie about witnesses but not video evidence or dna as said yor briefs must have been shite What's the brief got to do with it? You sound like you haven't got a clue mate. I've been sat in an interview with plod IMPLYING that they have got video evidence and TELLING me point blank that they have got my footprints. Both were complete lies to prompt a confession. This is in the initial interview. No brief present as I wasn't guilty and I knew I wasn't. whats your brief got to do with it are you being serious ? so when your sat in court who is representing you ? if theyve lied about evidence they have to get a confession its inadmissable in court listen pal ive been in more interviews than most n the best reply is no comment was told that at 14 by my soliciter that i have still to this day iff needed 17 year on Quote Link to post
DeerhoundLurcherMan 997 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 NO THEY CARNT they carnt tell you theyve got something that they havnt ill have you a friendly bet mate ring a brief up and ask same as if they said weve got dna evidence and they havnt you would get it thrown out in court even if yu admitted it They can. And they do.They told me I was free to go. No charges. Only taken in "to assist with enquiries". Then when I said right I'm going they threatened to arrest me and keep us in for the night at another station miles away. Then they lied about having video evidence. Then they lied about having witnesses. They will and do lie through their teeth. they can lie about witnesses but not video evidence or dna as said yor briefs must have been shite What's the brief got to do with it? You sound like you haven't got a clue mate. I've been sat in an interview with plod IMPLYING that they have got video evidence and TELLING me point blank that they have got my footprints. Both were complete lies to prompt a confession. This is in the initial interview. No brief present as I wasn't guilty and I knew I wasn't. whats your brief got to do with it are you being serious ? so when your sat in court who is representing you ? if theyve lied about evidence they have to get a confession its inadmissable in court listen pal ive been in more interviews than most n the best reply is no comment was told that at 14 by my soliciter that i have still to this day iff needed 17 year on Your going round in circles now Andy. We are talking about police lying in interviews about evidence to get a confession. Nothing to do with who's representing you in court... If you've been in more police interviews than most then you would know the kind of stunts they try and pull... Quote Link to post
slip lead 862 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 Anyone that thinks the police don't lie just haven't had much exspiriance dealing with the c##ts. 1 Quote Link to post
andy97 209 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 (edited) they carnt lie and say theyve got dna or finerprints in interview if they havnt the can say they have witnesses or other bullshit and if this is ever brough before a court it will get kicked out thats why im talking about soliciters aswell theres certain things they carnt lie about trust me ive bin in more interviews and jails in this country than i care to remember ye they are lieing cnuts and i hate the fcukers n theyll try anything to get a confession but certain things they carnt do in interview Edited May 6, 2014 by andy97 Quote Link to post
andy97 209 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 right ive just rang my soliciters and the police CANNOT I REPEAT CANNOT PUT EVIDENCE TO YOU THAT THEY HAVE NOT GOT AND THATS STRAIGHT OUT OF THE MOUTH OF MY SOLICITER Quote Link to post
danw 1,748 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 right ive just rang my soliciters and the police CANNOT I REPEAT CANNOT PUT EVIDENCE TO YOU THAT THEY HAVE NOT GOT AND THATS STRAIGHT OUT OF THE MOUTH OF MY SOLICITER Seriously you really went to the trouble of ringing your brief to find out if some one on a forum was right or wrong? only on THL 2 Quote Link to post
paulus 26 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 right ive just rang my soliciters and the police CANNOT I REPEAT CANNOT PUT EVIDENCE TO YOU THAT THEY HAVE NOT GOT AND THATS STRAIGHT OUT OF THE MOUTH OF MY SOLICITER Seriously you really went to the trouble of ringing your brief to find out if some one on a forum was right or wrong? only on THL and we all know solicitors always tell the truth Quote Link to post
nothernlite 18,089 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 right ive just rang my soliciters and the police CANNOT I REPEAT CANNOT PUT EVIDENCE TO YOU THAT THEY HAVE NOT GOT AND THATS STRAIGHT OUT OF THE MOUTH OF MY SOLICITER maybe cant put it to you in writing but can tell you with there lying mouths lol phoning your. Lawyer class pmsl Quote Link to post
slip lead 862 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 There not that stupid (POLICE) to incriminate them self on tape. But they will say all sorts of tape so YOU spill ON tape.. Quote Link to post
andy97 209 Posted May 6, 2014 Report Share Posted May 6, 2014 right ive just rang my soliciters and the police CANNOT I REPEAT CANNOT PUT EVIDENCE TO YOU THAT THEY HAVE NOT GOT AND THATS STRAIGHT OUT OF THE MOUTH OF MY SOLICITER Seriously you really went to the trouble of ringing your brief to find out if some one on a forum was right or wrong? only on THL i did mate ye just to prove a point does my head in [BANNED TEXT] you no your right about something so jus rang to make sure were on first name terms n as said been useing im for 17 years Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.