Rspca

[trenchfoot 4,243]

In surprised the country mans weekly contributors on here aren't fighting over who's getting to write the story. Mon da feck authors

true, but the story is one thing, getting pressure on the RSPCA to let Dymented see his dogs and get them back is the priority.

 

As the RSPCA have no legal powers, why not report them to another animal welfare charity and get them to seize the dogs off them

[Outlaw Pete 2,224]

Dy; I emailed Tesco, mate. Got an automated, out of hours response. I'll let this thread know what tomorrow brings.

 

I'm keeping copies, obviously

[Outlaw Pete 2,224]

Trenchfoot; I've seen where the rspca have crushed little, local, Dog Rescues. See my own post, on here. #248, I think it is?

 

What law gives them these powers? Why can't Oxfam dice Dogs ....?

 

What's Going On?????

[trenchfoot 4,243]

• Whilst the Society’s staff issue criminal proceedings against offenders, they do so by way of private prosecution.

taken from here! http://the-shg.org/The%20Law%20and%20the%20RSPCA.htm.

 

what, apart from finance, is stopping anyone from doing the same to them for their actions?

[Outlaw Pete 2,224]

what, apart from finance, is stopping anyone from doing the same to them for their actions?

 

 

That's the Fifty Million Pound Question, mate.

 

Unfortunately; That's about how much of little old ladies entire estates worth They have available to bung at the court costs.

 

I'll leave it there .....

[Tiercel 6,986]

I think the problem we have here, is that Dy and Clive are not willing to show their full hands, for obvious reasons. And to be honest I don't think we should be speculating what is and is not happening with regards to the legal side of the case.

 

As has been said Clive Rees is a well respected and experienced solicitor who knows his job. There may be reasons that we are not privy too that he has not pushed for dy to see his dogs? Only he and dy would know those reasons. Personally I would hate for dy to slip up defending himself and let something slip that would jeopardise his case in any way.

 

TC

[trenchfoot 4,243]

 

what, apart from finance, is stopping anyone from doing the same to them for their actions?

 

 

That's the Fifty Million Pound Question, mate.

 

Unfortunately; That's about how much of little old ladies entire estates worth They have available to bung at the court costs.

 

I'll leave it there .....

 

true, but how many would change a their wills if "bad press" like this became well publicised. The RSPCA are struggling for funds, and cannot afford to upset all the little old ladies. get it out there and shout it from the roof tops!

[stabba 10,745]

I think the problem we have here, is that Dy and Clive are not willing to show their full hands, for obvious reasons. And to be honest I don't think we should be speculating what is and is not happening with regards to the legal side of the case.

 

As has been said Clive Rees is a well respected and experienced solicitor who knows his job. There may be reasons that we are not privy too that he has not pushed for dy to see his dogs? Only he and dy would know those reasons. Personally I would hate for dy to slip up defending himself and let something slip that would jeopardise his case in any way.

 

TC

I can see that as a valid point...But...Dog's lives are at risk...Would Dy be willing to lose anymore...i doubt he would and neither should Clive. But like you say..Best not to speculate so i'll leave it at that

[dymented 2,220]

And Clive is just going let them fob you off?? What are you paying the man for?? Imo Clive should be spouting this act..that act..this law ..that law..to get them to let you see your dog's. You as yet havn't been charged with anything so the dog's are still legally your's.

trust me Clives on the ball stabba bud

 

have the countryside alliance been informed about this case. whether your a member or not, it is in their best interest to act in cases of lawful hunting. or are they still trying to find their teeth?

They are aware off all the fact's

 

In surprised the country mans weekly contributors on here aren't fighting over who's getting to write the story. Mon da feck authors

Tracy is are aware off all the fact's

 

I think the problem we have here, is that Dy and Clive are not willing to show their full hands, for obvious reasons. And to be honest I don't think we should be speculating what is and is not happening with regards to the legal side of the case.

 

As has been said Clive Rees is a well respected and experienced solicitor who knows his job. There may be reasons that we are not privy too that he has not pushed for dy to see his dogs? Only he and dy would know those reasons. Personally I would hate for dy to slip up defending himself and let something slip that would jeopardise his case in any way.

 

TC

i cart put everything on here so they can prepare them selves and make up lies. thanks for all your support keep sharing This act off cruelty and neglect by the rspca has had well over 50,000 views between thl and fb and a lot off media attention people are now seeing what the rspca are really capable off doing !!

[Ideation 8,216]

I hope you nail the b*****ds to the wall mate.

[Tiercel 6,986]

Another problem with the media is that they are bound by legal constraints, as the RSPCA have not yet been charged with anything, technically there is nothing to report except accusations. If the RSPCA do get charged with animal cruelty then there will be a big media frenzy. But until such time it's a matter of watch and make enquiries so they are ready with the story when the time comes.

 

TC

[NEWKID 27,131]

I think the problem we have here, is that Dy and Clive are not willing to show their full hands, for obvious reasons. And to be honest I don't think we should be speculating what is and is not happening with regards to the legal side of the case.

 

As has been said Clive Rees is a well respected and experienced solicitor who knows his job. There may be reasons that we are not privy too that he has not pushed for dy to see his dogs? Only he and dy would know those reasons. Personally I would hate for dy to slip up defending himself and let something slip that would jeopardise his case in any way.

 

TC

Very well put mate,

I would imagine a very strong case is being put together, and at the minute no slip ups can be afforded,

This case may not turn out to be all about funds, presented the correct way is say the evidence is about as damning as it gets, Dy's asked a few times for other people's similar experience, a case is being built, we can all support it the correct way perhaps...

Edited May 8, 2014 by NEWKID

[South hams hunter 8,921]

Hope they get screwed.

 

All the best dy

[blackpack 70]

All the best buddy right behind you

[Outlaw Pete 2,224]

At this rate, they'll be looking for a spin doctor of the calibre of Max Clifford .......... Oh .....