Jump to content

Any Thoughts On The .204 Ruger Calibre?


Recommended Posts

for long range fox the 204 imo is an ideal rd , but like deker said , the .243 will cover most of your needs , unless you are specifically shooting fox out to 200yds plus , then the 204 will come into its own …..very fast , very flat next to no recoil , if you have the use for one go for it , i doubt you will be disappointed

Link to post

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Just use .243 for both?

Would it really though? Are you going to be firing so many rounds for the sake of a few 10's of foxes that the price of .243 rounds comes to more than the cost of an entirely new rifle? You already ha

Hi Dan, been running a .204 for around 3yr now & I'm more than happy with what it does.I home reload for it as the factory ammo ain't easy to get up north & it's expensive anyway.

A .243 with a 55-60 grain bullet will out perform a .204 every time, so why bother just use your .243 for both, a .22-250 will last for years if you look after it, a keeper I know has had his since the 80s and it has killed hundreds of foxes, and it is still as accurate as ever, and besides, how many rounds do you fire in an average foxing session? its up to you but I would save myself the price of another rifle and spend it on glass for the .243.

Link to post

I used to shoot a .223 for fox but changed to .204, i also have a .243. The .204 i have will shoot 26grn, 32grn, 39grn or 40grn bullets just aswell as each other. Zeroed at 1" high at 100yds it shoots flat out to 300yds so ideal for fox at night when it's hard to judge distance accurately. There is no recoil to speak of and you never lose the sight picture, so you squeeze the trigger and see the target go down.As for velocities with a short barrel a gunsmith in America started with a 26" barrel and kept cutting 1" off to see how it was affected. It turned out that the optimum length was 23" and the difference between that and a 20" barrel was only75fps so not really worth bothering about. Mine is a Tikka T3 varmint 20" and out of curiosity i chronoed some Hornady factory 32grn ammo which averaged 4238fps. I have taken to home loading and use mostly 32grn Hornady v max bullets, i have not had any runners and the damage to foxes internals is devastating. It is also very good for long range crows etc and is also very quiet.

Link to post

all good calibres. i prefer two rifles one for foxing one for deer. i have a 25/06. good all round calibre. 70 grain bullets upto 120.

 

the lighter range make great foxing bullets. but they use a good lump of powder. i like a even lighter bullet for foxing. i used 50 grain in my 22/250 and 40's when i had a 223

they all do the job well.

 

ive now sold my 22/250 and the 25/06 replaced this. but im still going to get another foxing and vermin rifle. a 17 remington again i think is on the cards.

there superb for foxing and vermin

Link to post

Compare .204 32g V-Max (actually most of the .204) and .243 58g V-Max.

 

http://www.hornady.com/assets/files/ballistics/2013-Standard-Ballistics.pdf

 

With regards flat shooting they are VERY similar. :thumbs:

 

As before though, you need to get what you want! :yes:

Similar, but the .204 40gr V-MAX pips it by 1.6 inches at 500 yards :tongue2:

 

Not much in it to be fair. I wonder which is the cheaper to reload? This is the debate I'll have with myself when I come to move onto centrefire :hmm:

Link to post

Compare .204 32g V-Max (actually most of the .204) and .243 58g V-Max.

 

http://www.hornady.com/assets/files/ballistics/2013-Standard-Ballistics.pdf

 

With regards flat shooting they are VERY similar. :thumbs:

 

As before though, you need to get what you want! :yes:

 

 

 

 

I sometimes use my .243 with 58grn when i fancy a change or i am just lamping as opposed to using night vision. However the .204 shoots so sweetly i soon go back to it.

Link to post

 

Compare .204 32g V-Max (actually most of the .204) and .243 58g V-Max.

 

http://www.hornady.com/assets/files/ballistics/2013-Standard-Ballistics.pdf

 

With regards flat shooting they are VERY similar. :thumbs:

 

As before though, you need to get what you want! :yes:

 

 

 

 

I sometimes use my .243 with 58grn when i fancy a change or i am just lamping as opposed to using night vision. However the .204 shoots so sweetly i soon go back to it. Reloading i can do 2 1/2 cartridges for a pound.

 

Link to post

Interesting opinions guys. Really undecided though. I want something as cheap as possible to shoot fox out to 200yards maybe 250max. Currently uning the hmr sub 100 yards but could have easily doubled if not tripled my bags using a rifle capable out to 200-250 yards.

Link to post

 

Compare .204 32g V-Max (actually most of the .204) and .243 58g V-Max.

 

http://www.hornady.com/assets/files/ballistics/2013-Standard-Ballistics.pdf

 

With regards flat shooting they are VERY similar. :thumbs:

 

As before though, you need to get what you want! :yes:

Similar, but the .204 40gr V-MAX pips it by 1.6 inches at 500 yards :tongue2:

 

Not much in it to be fair. I wonder which is the cheaper to reload? This is the debate I'll have with myself when I come to move onto centrefire :hmm:

 

 

Anyone know which calibre, .204 or .243 is better in the wind?

Link to post

 

Anyone know which calibre, .204 or .243 is better in the wind?

 

http://www.federalpremium.com/products/rifle.aspx

 

Example from Federal site!

 

Select the ammo you want by checking the ammo box, (for example .204 32g V-Shok and .243 55g V-Shok) then hit compare, then scroll down to wind drift!

 

Cheers Deker

 

Looks like the .243 trumps it. Looks like a very versatile little calibre the .243, lots of loading options available. At least on the Federal site anyway

Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...