Jump to content

Oscar Pistorius


Recommended Posts

 

 

 

Now, if i went to bed with the mrs beside me, woke up on hearing someone in the bathroom, and the mrs is no longer in bed with me, i think i would conclude that the person in the bathroom is her, as would most normal thinking people surely? NOT Think, who could that possibly be in there, i better run a few rounds thru the door incase it aint her... :blink:

Yokel.

how many times your in bed, when she wakes you and she says , I think I heard something down stairs or next room etc, either way he would have woke her to tell her he thinks somebody else in the house.He lying right right through to his stumps :yes: he will get sent down ,just look at the jury faces :yes:
There is no jury ray .........

Aye but if there was they'd see through him....lol

Definitely .... Guilty as fukc ..........

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I heard if found guilty hes going to get the electric chair!!!!   f**k me look at the damage he did on stumps never mind giving him a mobility scooter!

Any cripple lucky enough to pull a stunning bird like that and then shoot her derserves jail imo......

ive got my theory,he had an argument with her she ran and locked herself in the bathroom and because he couldn't kick the door in he shot her simple

Posted Images

If it was an intruder he shot would this case be going on?? Dont think so,that's what makes me think he knew what he was doing,he knew how to kill her and get off? We'll so he thinks

well I still think he innocent an so johnny

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you woke in the night,hearing a noise in the bathroom,would you not just check your wifes beside you,before crawling to bathroom,and unloading a gun threw the door,why do these countries let any c...t have these handguns.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was an intruder he shot would this case be going on?? Dont think so,that's what makes me think he knew what he was doing,he knew how to kill her and get off? We'll so he thinks

The prosecutor has already gone to great lengths to point out that WHO he shot is almost immaterial. The charge of murder rests on 'intent', and they're contesting that if you fire a gun at someone, anyone, your intention is to injure or kill them - the name and address of the target doesn't matter.

 

Prosecutor Nel badgered and badgered him very aggressively yesterday, along the lines that if it had been a real intruder, Pistorius still approached the bathroom with the intention of shooting. Shooting someone .

 

You're right Clipo - Christ, he's hostlle ! Not sure that type of questioning would be allowed over here............

 

For what my opinion's worth, I think they argued, she locked herself in the bathroom and he lost his rag.........with tragic consquences.

Edited by Blackbriar
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Black briar,,,,I watched a lot of the first week ,,,whilst had flue,,,,and I got to say it was the defence lawer that was getting right on my tits,,,,his constant badgering of some of the witnesses,,,,repeatedly asking the same question,,,,

 

And South African law is stupid with no jury,,,,, that said he has a lot of support out there,,,,,he's guilty as sin

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If it was an intruder he shot would this case be going on?? Dont think so,that's what makes me think he knew what he was doing,he knew how to kill her and get off? We'll so he thinks

The prosecutor has already gone to great lengths to point out that WHO he shot is almost immaterial. The charge of murder rests on 'intent', and they're contesting that if you fire a gun at someone, anyone, your intention is to injure or kill them - the name and address of the target doesn't matter.

 

Prosecutor Nel badgered and badgered him very aggressively yesterday, along the lines that if it had been a real intruder, Pistorius still approached the bathroom with the intention of shooting. Shooting someone .

 

You're right Clipo - Christ, he's hostlle ! Not sure that type of questioning would be allowed over here............

 

For what my opinion's worth, I think they argued, she locked herself in the bathroom and he lost his rag.........with tragic consquences.

 

spot on, that's it in a nutshell :yes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Black briar,,,,I watched a lot of the first week ,,,whilst had flue,,,,and I got to say it was the defence lawer that was getting right on my tits,,,,his constant badgering of some of the witnesses,,,,repeatedly asking the same question,,,,

 

And South African law is stupid with no jury,,,,, that said he has a lot of support out there,,,,,he's guilty as sin

I didn't see much of the defence but if Nel is anything to go by.....................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...