Jump to content

Gays,,,lesbians,,,,having Children?


Recommended Posts

 

Neems, seriously, men shouldn't bottle feed their own baby?.......................because it's not natural?

http://greatinventions.tv/home/product/mr-milker-male-breastfeeding/

 

just plain wrong :laugh::laugh::laugh:

 

 

:laugh: f***ing hell dan, you're spending too much time alone in those woods mate. :laugh:

 

I was down your way a couple of weeks ago, Wool, I would have dropped by but had absolutely no free time. :thumbs:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 239
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

wrong on every level possible and just setting up the poor child for a lifetime of bullying......prime example is elton john and his lover having kids....imo its not fair on any child to grow up with

Gays can't breed so why unnatuaraly give them children? ,fecking worlds gone gay mad.

As long as the kids are cared for and loved. I'm sure Fred and Rosemary's kids would have jumped at the chance to stay with a cpl of poofs lol

Posted Images

Neems, seriously, men shouldn't bottle feed their own baby?.......................because it's not natural?

ideally no,the woman should breast feed if possible.

 

as they get older there'no problem but he was talking about newborns.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

No-one mentioned hate,but plenty of mongrelised black\european people hate whites.

 

Very mixed race people would be very rare in a natural environment,we wouldnt mix.

 

And is a man feeding a newborn natural?

most animals that live in groups have strict roles for each gender,its's important we reinforce them especially in children, to counter the conditioning we face today.

 

And any person of a different race even being near a child is not natural.

 

 

Right, so humans just appeared all over the place out of thin air yet we share extremely similar DNA regardless of our race? There was never a common ancestor or groups of early people that travelled and developed in various areas of the world? Every country just "had" people in them and these countries had ready made borders to prevent mass migration of people in search of resources or a natural curiosity to explore or see what was over the hill?

 

Mixed race relationships are not "natural" now regardless, and a child should never have a parent of one race and another of a differing race?

 

It's not "Natural" for a doctor, practising in a European country, of say 1st generation African origin to be involved with the life saving medical requirements of a baby of 4th generation Asian descent? What should happen to that baby if there is no doctors of Asian origin available?

 

Babies should not go on holidays? At what age should it be "natural" to take your offspring on holiday to a place where there is a majority of people from a different race?

 

Should we have race segregation in our country, in fact, in every country?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

And any person of a different race even being near a child is not natural.

 

I genuinely feel sorry for your children ........

 

I would be genuinely surprised if he had ever had any contact with a human female,,,,with his take on humanity

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Neems, seriously, men shouldn't bottle feed their own baby?.......................because it's not natural?

http://greatinventions.tv/home/product/mr-milker-male-breastfeeding/

 

just plain wrong :laugh::laugh::laugh:

 

 

:laugh: f*****g hell dan, you're spending too much time alone in those woods mate. :laugh:

 

I was down your way a couple of weeks ago, Wool, I would have dropped by but had absolutely no free time. :thumbs:

 

Shame you didn't get chance it's been an interesting couple of weeks on the cull I'll text you some pics :thumbs:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

No-one mentioned hate,but plenty of mongrelised black\european people hate whites.

Very mixed race people would be very rare in a natural environment,we wouldnt mix.

And is a man feeding a newborn natural?

most animals that live in groups have strict roles for each gender,its's important we reinforce them especially in children, to counter the conditioning we face today.

And any person of a different race even being near a child is not natural.

Right, so humans just appeared all over the place out of thin air yet we share extremely similar DNA regardless of our race? There was never a common ancestor or groups of early people that travelled and developed in various areas of the world? Every country just "had" people in them and these countries had ready made borders to prevent mass migration of people in search of resources or a natural curiosity to explore or see what was over the hill?

 

Mixed race relationships are not "natural" now regardless, and a child should never have a parent of one race and another of a differing race?

 

It's not "Natural" for a doctor, practising in a European country, of say 1st generation African origin to be involved with the life saving medical requirements of a baby of 4th generation Asian descent? What should happen to that baby if there is no doctors of Asian origin available?

 

Babies should not go on holidays? At what age should it be "natural" to take your offspring on holiday to a place where there is a majority of people from a different race?

 

Should we have race segregation in our country, in fact, in every country?

most of that was mindless waffling,but of course we shouldnt mix.

 

why would we want to destroy the human diversity of our planet?

cultures dont mix eventually one will dominate the other.

 

miscegenation destroys both races and replaces them with a new mongrel creature with no connection the land he lives on.

 

And for me the regional theory is more logical than the out of Africa theory.

Edited by neems
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

most of that was mindless waffling,but of course we shouldnt mix.

 

why would we want to destroy the human diversity of our planet?

cultures dont mix eventually one will dominate the other.

 

miscegenation destroys both races and replaces them with a new mongrel creature with no connection the land he lives on.

 

And for me the regional theory is more logical than the out of Africa theory.

 

 

I'll make it clearer then.

 

Why shouldn't we mix? What will happen?

 

If your wife was in child birth and was having difficulties, you wouldn't let a team of doctors, that were of different race to you, help deliver the baby safely as they shouldn't be near that baby? You'd wait for a team of doctors that was 100% the same race as your and your wife or would you just try and deliver it yourself as that would be more "natural"?

 

So you think diversity means to keep all the people of one colour in one place, the people of another colour or race in another etc. until they are all split up and they should not be allowed to integrate at all? That creates diversification?

 

So you have no connection with the land you are surrounded by then going by what you say about miscegenation as the British population, is made up of many many races as we have been conquered, invaded etc many times during the years by people carrying all manner of genetic make up from different races. I hope you don't think you're a pedigree specimen, the epitome of what a human should look like or a champion race. Other folk have thought that, spread the word and a whole load of nasty things happened throughout the course of human history.

 

Please expand on your "regional theory" as I am interested as to how different people were created in different countries right from the off without any travelling involved, we all just came to be.

Edited by hutch6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neems wtf :icon_eek:

 

So if I have kids with my Mexican mrs that's wrong??? :blink:

 

and the fact that my eldest is part Dutch is that wrong??

 

Or how about a Scotsman and English couple having kids (Gaelic and Germanic)

 

'Kinell I bet you believe Chinese women have slanty fannys aswell :laugh: :laugh:

 

As for the roles I can't argue with that, it is normal for mammals that live in groups to have set gender dependent roles but interaction between the sexes is always there

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

most of that was mindless waffling,but of course we shouldnt mix.

 

why would we want to destroy the human diversity of our planet?

cultures dont mix eventually one will dominate the other.

 

miscegenation destroys both races and replaces them with a new mongrel creature with no connection the land he lives on.

 

And for me the regional theory is more logical than the out of Africa theory.

 

 

I'll make it clearer then.

 

Why shouldn't we mix? What will happen?

 

If your wife was in child birth and was having difficulties, you wouldn't let a team of doctors, that were of different race to you, help deliver the baby safely as they shouldn't be near that baby? You'd wait for a team of doctors that was 100% the same race as your and your wife or would you just try and deliver it yourself as that would be more "natural"?

 

So you think diversity means to keep all the people of one colour in one place, the people of another colour or race in another etc. until they are all split up and they should not be allowed to integrate at all? That creates diversification?

 

So you have no connection with the land you are surrounded by then going by what you say about miscegenation as the British population, is made up of many many races as we have been conquered, invaded etc many times during the years by people carrying all manner of genetic make up from different races. I hope you don't think you're a pedigree specimen, the epitome of what a human should look like or a champion race. Other folk have thought that, spread the word and a whole load of nasty things happened throughout the course of human history.

 

Please expand on your "regional theory" as I am interested as to how different people were created in different countries right from the off without any travelling involved, we all just came to be.

 

My youngest was moments from death thanks to a fuuckin stupid Paki bitch who nearly destroyed her skull with forceps. She was forcibly moved aside by a black midwife who then proceeded to save the life of both my ex and my youngest.

 

Colour has fuuck all to do with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course I would let a non european doctor look after me or my family.

 

I'd seek the best help available and if they were not european so be it,you're confusing a need for segregation with mindless hate.

 

thats what the propaganda says segregation is,but it's not.

 

as for all your other questions read this link

 

Atala.fr

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neems wtf :icon_eek:

 

So if I have kids with my Mexican mrs that's wrong??? :blink:

 

and the fact that my eldest is part Dutch is that wrong??

 

Or how about a Scotsman and English couple having kids (Gaelic and Germanic)

 

'Kinell I bet you believe Chinese women have slanty fannys aswell :laugh: :laugh:

 

As for the roles I can't argue with that, it is normal for mammals that live in groups to have set gender dependent roles but interaction between the sexes is always there

mexican isnt a race.

 

Mixing race (species) is wrong,if you follow he link you'll read why.

 

and that doesnt even touch on the moral aspect of destroying a race and replacing it with mongrels.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Neems wtf :icon_eek:

 

So if I have kids with my Mexican mrs that's wrong??? :blink:

 

and the fact that my eldest is part Dutch is that wrong??

 

Or how about a Scotsman and English couple having kids (Gaelic and Germanic)

 

'Kinell I bet you believe Chinese women have slanty fannys aswell :laugh: :laugh:

 

As for the roles I can't argue with that, it is normal for mammals that live in groups to have set gender dependent roles but interaction between the sexes is always there

mexican isnt a race.

Mixing race (species) is wrong,if you follow he link you'll read why.

and that doesnt even touch on the moral aspect of destroying a race and replacing it with mongrels.

How is Mexican not a race?

 

Apart from Spanish being a big influence in Mexico ,,,,,,there was a native race living there befor the Spanish turned up,,,,and that race of people were as far removed from us as is possible to get

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...