Jump to content

Propaganda


Recommended Posts

I think it is a battle we won't win. Minds have all ready been made up. People are either for,against or don't care and they are unlikely to change there minds in any direction.

As for the future generations I think they are either bought up understanding the ways of the country side or not. The ones that have been bought up understanding it are hopefully the ones that continue the traditions.

People who read that article will either understand it and see nothing wrong or those on the other of the fence I am not sure how there brains work. But neither side will jump ship because of that

  • Like 2
Link to post

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

This article also serves to reinforce the point which has been made on here and on many occasions as to how a relatively innocent photograph can so easily be misrepresented.   The photograph of the

Sadly this is journalism at it's very worse. If you took all the sensationalism out of the report it's a report of fox control properly carried out within the law. The hunt would be within their righ

The mirrior of mis information Although we all know the fox has been humanly despatched to the letter of the law the jorno is an anti and has been given the Window to propogate this version o

Forgive me here guys, but as the law stands (my interpretation) is that terrierwork is only permitted I.e entering a dog to an occupied (fox) earth, for the protection of ground nesting birds/game birds.,(I.e an estate) and dosent permit you to enter a terrier where on farmland i.e for protection of sheep/lambs? In which event the Mirrors report in saying "The 2004 Hunting Act , which banned hunting foxes with a pack of hounds, doesn't cover the use of dogs to flush out animals underground" is wrong.

 

Genuine question, I'm not trying to stir anything up, and for the record I'm a regular hunter, twice a week, carrying out my own terrierwork and with hounds also.

 

Atb

 

RP

Link to post

Forgive me here guys, but as the law stands (my interpretation) is that terrierwork is only permitted I.e entering a dog to an occupied (fox) earth, for the protection of ground nesting birds/game birds.,(I.e an estate) and dosent permit you to enter a terrier where on farmland i.e for protection of sheep/lambs? In which event the Mirrors report in saying "The 2004 Hunting Act , which banned hunting foxes with a pack of hounds, doesn't cover the use of dogs to flush out animals underground" is wrong.

Genuine question, I'm not trying to stir anything up, and for the record I'm a regular hunter, twice a week, carrying out my own terrierwork and with hounds also.

Atb

RP

the mirror just makes accusations in that piece nothing more nothing less. Photos show. Men terrier fox nothing more nothing less all the rest is conjecture , unlike like you admitting to a said act. Lol. As barrie says. Think a bit more
Link to post

I think it is a battle we won't win. Minds have all ready been made up. People are either for,against or don't care and they are unlikely to change there minds in any direction.

As for the future generations I think they are either bought up understanding the ways of the country side or not. The ones that have been bought up understanding it are hopefully the ones that continue the traditions.

People who read that article will either understand it and see nothing wrong or those on the other of the fence I am not sure how there brains work. But neither side will jump ship because of that

 

. PR is a powerful machine. The chipping away of peoples perseption Of any thing works over a lenth of time I take it you mean the battle as in this poor attempt a jurnolisim as the war will be won Its tactics are working Ropeadope i think ali called it
Link to post

GTE you misunderstand me, i havent admitted to any said act, i carry out terrierwork within the law as and when, and with two hounds as the law permits.

 

I do plenty of thinking, hence i rarely post on here, and never post photos. Unfortuntely its the way the Countrys gone, trust no one.

 

RP

Link to post

and for the record I'm a regular hunter, twice a week, carrying out my own terrierwork and with hounds also.

Atb

RP

. Think before. You write we know you meant 1 soft terrier used in accordance with the law and you use two hounds to flush to guns But your terminology could be misconstrued by others Edited by gonetoearth
Link to post

It could be misconstrued in a lot of ways, for instance i could have meant i do terrierwork to rabbits, to squirrels or unicorns, and hunt all the above with my hounds.

 

At no point have i mentioned going against any laws. If any of the moderators thought i should 'think' more before i type, and "misconstrued" anything i have typed im sure my post would have been zapped.

 

RP

Link to post
It could be misconstrued in a lot of ways, for instance i could have meant i do terrierwork to rabbits, to squirrels or unicorns, and hunt all the above with my hounds.

At no point have i mentioned going against any laws. If any of the moderators thought i should 'think' more before i type, and "misconstrued" anything i have typed im sure my post would have been zapped.

RP[/

Don't listen to him rebel pack, he talks a lot of shit most of the time :laugh:
. And you write it old chap
Link to post

It could be misconstrued in a lot of ways, for instance i could have meant i do terrierwork to rabbits, to squirrels or unicorns, and hunt all the above with my hounds.

At no point have i mentioned going against any laws. If any of the moderators thought i should 'think' more before i type, and "misconstrued" anything i have typed im sure my post would have been zapped.

RP

. Dont have to prove any thing to me. Rb.
Link to post

 

20140121_2110521.jpg

This is the result of a fox preying on lambs .Three killed in all ,farmer saw it happen .I was called to deal with it and heres the result ,shot as it fed .Farmer had eyes on it from the time it killed to the time i got there .

abslutly brilliant now whats the chances of that getting published in the newspapers!!!

 

nice shooting pal job well done

 

There is every chance it will be published or at least used on a poster with the lamb carcasas missing.No offence to Foxdropper who was doing perfectly legal fox control but the anti mob could use that pic big time in the future.A lot of city-town people dont understand country ways and the ins and outs of hunting but if they seen that pic[especially with the cubs] id imagine they would have a very low opinion on diging and fox control as its very easy remove the lamd from the pic as everyone knows and thats the way the anti brigade work.IMO all these pics of terriers after working and gorey pics of dead foxs should be kept of the net,again no offence to fox dropper as i have done the same myself many times,hateful job but when the farmer calls then its got to be done but leave the camera at home.

  • Like 1
Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...