terryd 8,551 Posted January 27, 2014 Report Share Posted January 27, 2014 I think it is a battle we won't win. Minds have all ready been made up. People are either for,against or don't care and they are unlikely to change there minds in any direction. As for the future generations I think they are either bought up understanding the ways of the country side or not. The ones that have been bought up understanding it are hopefully the ones that continue the traditions. People who read that article will either understand it and see nothing wrong or those on the other of the fence I am not sure how there brains work. But neither side will jump ship because of that 2 Quote Link to post
Rebel Pack 8 Posted January 27, 2014 Report Share Posted January 27, 2014 Forgive me here guys, but as the law stands (my interpretation) is that terrierwork is only permitted I.e entering a dog to an occupied (fox) earth, for the protection of ground nesting birds/game birds.,(I.e an estate) and dosent permit you to enter a terrier where on farmland i.e for protection of sheep/lambs? In which event the Mirrors report in saying "The 2004 Hunting Act , which banned hunting foxes with a pack of hounds, doesn't cover the use of dogs to flush out animals underground" is wrong. Genuine question, I'm not trying to stir anything up, and for the record I'm a regular hunter, twice a week, carrying out my own terrierwork and with hounds also. Atb RP Quote Link to post
gonetoearth 5,144 Posted January 28, 2014 Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 Forgive me here guys, but as the law stands (my interpretation) is that terrierwork is only permitted I.e entering a dog to an occupied (fox) earth, for the protection of ground nesting birds/game birds.,(I.e an estate) and dosent permit you to enter a terrier where on farmland i.e for protection of sheep/lambs? In which event the Mirrors report in saying "The 2004 Hunting Act , which banned hunting foxes with a pack of hounds, doesn't cover the use of dogs to flush out animals underground" is wrong. Genuine question, I'm not trying to stir anything up, and for the record I'm a regular hunter, twice a week, carrying out my own terrierwork and with hounds also. Atb RP the mirror just makes accusations in that piece nothing more nothing less. Photos show. Men terrier fox nothing more nothing less all the rest is conjecture , unlike like you admitting to a said act. Lol. As barrie says. Think a bit more Quote Link to post
gonetoearth 5,144 Posted January 28, 2014 Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 I think it is a battle we won't win. Minds have all ready been made up. People are either for,against or don't care and they are unlikely to change there minds in any direction. As for the future generations I think they are either bought up understanding the ways of the country side or not. The ones that have been bought up understanding it are hopefully the ones that continue the traditions. People who read that article will either understand it and see nothing wrong or those on the other of the fence I am not sure how there brains work. But neither side will jump ship because of that . PR is a powerful machine. The chipping away of peoples perseption Of any thing works over a lenth of time I take it you mean the battle as in this poor attempt a jurnolisim as the war will be won Its tactics are working Ropeadope i think ali called it Quote Link to post
Rebel Pack 8 Posted January 28, 2014 Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 GTE you misunderstand me, i havent admitted to any said act, i carry out terrierwork within the law as and when, and with two hounds as the law permits. I do plenty of thinking, hence i rarely post on here, and never post photos. Unfortuntely its the way the Countrys gone, trust no one. RP Quote Link to post
gonetoearth 5,144 Posted January 28, 2014 Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 (edited) and for the record I'm a regular hunter, twice a week, carrying out my own terrierwork and with hounds also. Atb RP. Think before. You write we know you meant 1 soft terrier used in accordance with the law and you use two hounds to flush to guns But your terminology could be misconstrued by others Edited January 28, 2014 by gonetoearth Quote Link to post
Tommy pepper 222 Posted January 28, 2014 Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 pr is a powerfull ther shuld be a thread started and pinned with plenty of pics of the damage fox and badger cause to livestock Quote Link to post
Rebel Pack 8 Posted January 28, 2014 Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 It could be misconstrued in a lot of ways, for instance i could have meant i do terrierwork to rabbits, to squirrels or unicorns, and hunt all the above with my hounds. At no point have i mentioned going against any laws. If any of the moderators thought i should 'think' more before i type, and "misconstrued" anything i have typed im sure my post would have been zapped. RP Quote Link to post
STRANGER 948 Posted January 28, 2014 Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 Don't listen to him rebel pack, he talks a lot of shit most of the time Quote Link to post
gonetoearth 5,144 Posted January 28, 2014 Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 It could be misconstrued in a lot of ways, for instance i could have meant i do terrierwork to rabbits, to squirrels or unicorns, and hunt all the above with my hounds.At no point have i mentioned going against any laws. If any of the moderators thought i should 'think' more before i type, and "misconstrued" anything i have typed im sure my post would have been zapped. RP[/ Don't listen to him rebel pack, he talks a lot of shit most of the time . And you write it old chap Quote Link to post
gonetoearth 5,144 Posted January 28, 2014 Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 It could be misconstrued in a lot of ways, for instance i could have meant i do terrierwork to rabbits, to squirrels or unicorns, and hunt all the above with my hounds. At no point have i mentioned going against any laws. If any of the moderators thought i should 'think' more before i type, and "misconstrued" anything i have typed im sure my post would have been zapped. RP . Dont have to prove any thing to me. Rb. Quote Link to post
twymanc 135 Posted January 28, 2014 Report Share Posted January 28, 2014 got an idea for a new topic whose up for a challenge lol???? Quote Link to post
fat man 4,741 Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 This is the result of a fox preying on lambs .Three killed in all ,farmer saw it happen .I was called to deal with it and heres the result ,shot as it fed .Farmer had eyes on it from the time it killed to the time i got there . abslutly brilliant now whats the chances of that getting published in the newspapers!!! nice shooting pal job well done There is every chance it will be published or at least used on a poster with the lamb carcasas missing.No offence to Foxdropper who was doing perfectly legal fox control but the anti mob could use that pic big time in the future.A lot of city-town people dont understand country ways and the ins and outs of hunting but if they seen that pic[especially with the cubs] id imagine they would have a very low opinion on diging and fox control as its very easy remove the lamd from the pic as everyone knows and thats the way the anti brigade work.IMO all these pics of terriers after working and gorey pics of dead foxs should be kept of the net,again no offence to fox dropper as i have done the same myself many times,hateful job but when the farmer calls then its got to be done but leave the camera at home. 1 Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.