Shooting Dogs..legal Or What.

[Ideation 8,216]

If he did it round here. . . . it'd end up somewhat apocalyptic for him. . . .

[beddyx 27]

here we go all the hard guy keyboard wizards have just woken up

[brenna 365]

Nans some english couple have took that fishery n surrounding land over they live in breconhill house I saw rake of shooters on it in the ttweed gear hunt away u have my permisson slip in away round the back fcukn joke these people we hunting tghere since we were lads and I'm fckd if few signs will put me off it

[lurcherman887 178]

With bunny on this one if he shot any of my dogs he's keane would be flatpacked and the wife would get the catapult treatment

[lurcherman887 178]

here we go all the hard guy keyboard wizards have just woken up

I'd run your land in a heartbeat

[nans pat 2,575]

weve a soliciter in belfast deals with these cases.his nickname is Sunny Jim fook ive seen some cheeky farmers reduced to tears when he visits.

[morton 5,368]

If you run a mutt in the vicinity of stock,especially without the landowners permission,then have the gonads to accept the consequence of your actions.A dog does not need to be a stock chaser to cause damage,stock panicking,especially at night,will often injure themselves in flight.Farmers are sick to the back teeth of irresponsible lurcher owners and the destruction they cause.A dog may start its pursuit well away from stock,that same pursuit can soon lead to the mutt entering fields containing stock.The amount of time we hear the old chestnut,my dogs stock trained,when the opposite is the reality.If a farmer was to shoot a dog when there is no livestock about,he,d be in the crapper and deserve to answer for his actions,if livestock is about he,s within his rights,deservedly so.I would,nt enter land without permission unless i was prepared to face the consequences,any mutt chasing stock wants a bullet,any farmer shooting a mutt without just cause deserves what may come his way,rarely does a farmer not have just cause.

[Ideation 8,216]

I'm not a computer hardman . . . . or any kind of hard man. . . . in fact I'm pretty pacifistic.

 

However, I happen to live in a part of the world where there are a lot of head bangers with lurchers who run them wherever the f**k they like (rightly or wrongly) . . . .

 

. . . now I'm fairly sure that if someone shot a dog for anything other than worrying stock, round these parts, said head bangers. . . . would take great delight in killing all of their live stock, burning any thing burnable and probably battering f**k out of them for good measure. . . . .

 

I'm not saying it's right or wrong. . . .or that I'd do it. . . but that's what its like.

[Phil Lloyd 10,738]

Coming from a rural background,.(my own Father being a Shepherd),..and often hunting amidst fields choc-full of livestock,..I was brought up with the premise that,.if your jukel killed or badly damaged a ewe,...you were obligated to cull him yourself..and,.then,..having done so,...the incident is forgotten,.....life moves on....

[Ideation 8,216]

I think we've gone a little off track Chalky. . . . this thread wasn't about stock worriers . . . . growing up in Wales. . . you will know how much of a no no that is.

 

This thread was talking about farmers who shoot dogs for just being on their land. . . . . no stock involved.

[bullx100% 681]

Coming from a rural background,.(my own Father being a Shepherd),..and often hunting amidst fields choc-full of livestock,..I was brought up with the premise that,.if your jukel killed or badly damaged a ewe,...you were obligated to cull him yourself..and,.then,..having done so,...the incident is forgotten,.....life moves on....

doesn't seem to be like that anymore...the majority of people when there dog hits a sheep they sell it on as a dog what's 100% stock broke...I very raely runn my dogs in feilds were any stock are present.I no I lose a lot of game through it but I've seen pleanty of dogs that have never looked at sheep all ov a sudden hit one.saw a good coursing dog do it once and normal it would run through any sheep after its quarry...my pup now what I'm stock breaking is for when I'm out and I slip on a rabbit in a field and if the quarry and dog go through a hedge and there's sheep on the otherside...I dout I'd slip it in a field with sheep in...but luky enought most places I go don't have sheep....

[brenna 365]

Few years back sum binlid shot a dog in crumlin the boys got hold of farmer give him a good battering n locked him in the boot of his own motor I got caught on the lamd next nite lamping got surronded by rake of farmers me n my mate thot we were gona get a hiding ended up they were hoping it was same lads who done the farmer just told us to f off outa the county

[Phil Lloyd 10,738]

I think we've gone a little off track Chalky. . . . this thread wasn't about stock worriers . . . . growing up in Wales. . . you will know how much of a no no that is.

 

This thread was talking about farmers who shoot dogs for just being on their land. . . . . no stock involved.

 

We have not gone off track,...well I ain't...

 

The answer to such a suggestion is plainly fecking obvious, and as such,..requires little thought or debate,...

 

If a fool of a man shoots, kills or injures your dog,.simply for chasing a poxy hare, deer or pheasant,...then of course,..you must offer instant retribution towards him,....or live with your shame for all eternity....

[nans pat 2,575]

If you run a mutt in the vicinity of stock,especially without the landowners permission,then have the gonads to accept the consequence of your actions.A dog does not need to be a stock chaser to cause damage,stock panicking,especially at night,will often injure themselves in flight.Farmers are sick to the back teeth of irresponsible lurcher owners and the destruction they cause.A dog may start its pursuit well away from stock,that same pursuit can soon lead to the mutt entering fields containing stock.The amount of time we hear the old chestnut,my dogs stock trained,when the opposite is the reality.If a farmer was to shoot a dog when there is no livestock about,he,d be in the crapper and deserve to answer for his actions,if livestock is about he,s within his rights,deservedly so.I would,nt enter land without permission unless i was prepared to face the consequences,any mutt chasing stock wants a bullet,any farmer shooting a mutt without just cause deserves what may come his way,rarely does a farmer not have just cause.

again theres no livestock.the lands rented to shooters its not the farmer hes doting .what ime saying by putting this sign up in legal terms hes showing INTENT .

[morton 5,368]

I'm not a computer hardman . . . . or any kind of hard man. . . . in fact I'm pretty pacifistic.

 

However, I happen to live in a part of the world where there are a lot of head bangers with lurchers who run them wherever the f**k they like (rightly or wrongly) . . . .

 

. . . now I'm fairly sure that if someone shot a dog for anything other than worrying stock, round these parts, said head bangers. . . . would take great delight in killing all of their live stock, burning any thing burnable and probably battering f**k out of them for good measure. . . . .

 

I'm not saying it's right or wrong. . . .or that I'd do it. . . but that's what its like.

Most of these so called handy types are rarely found on the land without a posse,especially at night,it surprising how most of them seem loathe to answer for their actions singly,only as a group?.I know of certain keepers and farmers who never seemed to suffer from these lads,twice.The farmers and keepers that seem to suffer from the mindless minority are sadly not physically equipped to be able to deal with them in the manner they deserve,sadly.Id certainly say its wrong for a lad to threaten somebody,s livelihood or person because of their own shortcomings,especially in dog training,stockmanship and manners,thats as you say the realitys of the times we live in now,alas its not a new scenario.