Jump to content

Prince Charles, Unfair Advantage Over Competition


Recommended Posts

You figured out what sound is yet darling?

No you had me beat fair and square, not a clue..... And neither does the American scientists it seems..... As I said before, I don't care if Albert f***ing Einstein is next to you, you are wrong :laugh:

 

Some years later, a similar question is posed. It is unknown whether the source of this question is Berkeley or not. In June 1883 in the magazine The Chautauquan, the question was put, "If a tree were to fall on an island where there were no human beings would there be any sound?" They then went on to answer the query with, "No. Sound is the sensation excited in the ear when the air or other medium is set in motion."[3] This seems to imply that the question is posed not from a philosophical viewpoint, but from a purely scientific one. The magazine Scientific American corroborated the technical aspect of this question, while leaving out the philosophic side, a year later when they asked the question slightly reworded, "If a tree were to fall on an uninhabited island, would there be any sound?" And gave a more technical answer, "Sound is vibration, transmitted to our senses through the mechanism of the ear, and recognized as sound only at our nerve centers. The falling of the tree or any other disturbance will produce vibration of the air. If there be no ears to hear, there will be no sound."[4]

 

Albert Einstein is reported to have asked his fellow physicist and friend Niels Bohr, one of the founding fathers of quantum mechanics, whether he realistically believed that 'the moon does not exist if nobody is looking at it.' To this Bohr replied that however hard he (Einstein) may try, he would not be able to prove that it does, thus giving the entire riddle the status of a kind of an infallible conjecture--one that cannot be either proved or disproved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

What, ?? You mean like my son,? Competing for work against Polish joiners, undercutting every job because they don`t pay tax or N.I and will work for peanuts ??     Is that the kind of unfair com

Nope. I`m saying get your priorities right.   Charles CONTRIBUTES a massive amount of money to the British tax system and to the economy in general.   If he gets a few perks because he is our FUTU

That hit man for Diana cant have been cheap ,

Like or hate the monarchy and hate Charles even more but the guy does a lot for young kids etc he's only one person and puts a lot of his energy into the people kids of this country what corporation do a fraction he does?

so did jimmy savile!!! oh and who was he mates with again?!?!?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sound is vibration and just because you aunt heard that vibration don't mean it ain't happened?

Yes sound is air vibrating but without a receiver to transfer those vibrations into sound, all it is is vibrating air.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've progressed a bit since the 1800s. LOL

 

Nice try :laugh:

 

And Bohr was making a philisophical point not a scientific one. LOL

HAW HAW HAW that's from Wikipedia, now your telling me its wrong google bore? Your as much of a scientist as I am a f***ing orange peel :laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suzy is a big fan of the old "Copy & Paste"..........have a look at the ferreting topics, talk about bore me a river! lol

Coming from London wilf likes to tell guys from the highlands how to dress warm while out lamping incase a snow storm comes HAW HAW HAW

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

We've progressed a bit since the 1800s. LOL

 

Nice try :laugh:

 

And Bohr was making a philisophical point not a scientific one. LOL

HAW HAW HAW that's from Wikipedia, now your telling me its wrong google bore? Your as much of a scientist as I am a f*****g orange peel :laugh:

 

 

His name was Bohr ya fanny!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

We've progressed a bit since the 1800s. LOL

 

Nice try :laugh:

 

And Bohr was making a philisophical point not a scientific one. LOL

HAW HAW HAW that's from Wikipedia, now your telling me its wrong google bore? Your as much of a scientist as I am a f*****g orange peel :laugh:

His name was Bohr ya fanny!

Pmsl I'm talking about you ya tit. Proved you know f**k all again. I had a wee chuckle at you dinning out on that, how you know everything. I knew you'd bring it up as soon as I was back on. In typical boring fashion, you didn't disappoint, first post to me :laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...