Malt 379 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 Just doing a bit or reading.. Apparently they can only be charged with abandonment in Portugal if they admit it was wilful, ie they knew they were going to put their kids in danger. Would that explain why they have never appeared to be sorry or said they feel guilty about leaving her alone? Maybe they've been advised to NEVER publicly say they feel guilty or express regret for leaving them because it would imply they knew they'd f****d up and then it could lead to them being jailed? I still maintain they would still be in possession of all three kids if they hadn't of left them.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lab 10,979 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 Just doing a bit or reading.. Apparently they can only be charged with abandonment in Portugal if they admit it was wilful, ie they knew they were going to put their kids in danger. Would that explain why they have never appeared to be sorry or said they feel guilty about leaving her alone? Maybe they've been advised to NEVER publicly say they feel guilty or express regret for leaving them because it would imply they knew they'd f****d up and then it could lead to them being jailed? I still maintain they would still be in possession of all three kids if they hadn't of left them.. Very plausible that. Surprised I've not read it elsewhere. Probably cause there's more stuff on trying to convict them than help then. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ArchieHood 3,692 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 Just doing a bit or reading.. Apparently they can only be charged with abandonment in Portugal if they admit it was wilful, ie they knew they were going to put their kids in danger. Would that explain why they have never appeared to be sorry or said they feel guilty about leaving her alone? Maybe they've been advised to NEVER publicly say they feel guilty or express regret for leaving them because it would imply they knew they'd f****d up and then it could lead to them being jailed? I still maintain they would still be in possession of all three kids if they hadn't of left them.. Very plausible that. Surprised I've not read it elsewhere. Probably cause there's more stuff on trying to convict them than help then. I come in peace Lab... .......I don't want convictions I want some answerers. Why would a mother leave her children at such a young age when shes waited for 5 years to become pregnant through IVF.? 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stealthy1 3,964 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 One of the photo fits looks like Tyson Fury Quote Link to post Share on other sites
South hams hunter 8,921 Posted October 15, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 Exactly archie, tbh I think they were more of a status symbol than anything and now she has become a publicity thing. Thousands of kids are lost yearly yet none stay in the press for 6 years, why has she? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The one 8,472 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 Ive just watched Crimewatch as i had it recordered and ive no changed my mind They left the kids every night and went to the same tapas bar anybody could have clicked on to there routine If that happened here they would of been jailed and there twins put into foster care Why is our police doing a two year investigation it happened abroad and who's footing the bill the British tax payer After watching the programme where he did nearly all the talking and she stared about the place i have a hard job believing there innocent And talking to somebody they reckon they left the kids alone all the time and they made a mistake doping maddy Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lab 10,979 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 Just doing a bit or reading.. Apparently they can only be charged with abandonment in Portugal if they admit it was wilful, ie they knew they were going to put their kids in danger. Would that explain why they have never appeared to be sorry or said they feel guilty about leaving her alone? Maybe they've been advised to NEVER publicly say they feel guilty or express regret for leaving them because it would imply they knew they'd f****d up and then it could lead to them being jailed? I still maintain they would still be in possession of all three kids if they hadn't of left them.. Very plausible that. Surprised I've not read it elsewhere. Probably cause there's more stuff on trying to convict them than help then. I come in peace Lab... .......I don't want convictions I want some answerers. Why would a mother leave her children at such a young age when shes waited for 5 years to become pregnant through IVF.? Because she thought they would be perfectly safe as they sat a small distance away eating dinner and having a drink with friends. The friends around the table must have thought the same ad they had left there children also. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. You bring up the IVF, glad you did mate. I only realised that last night watching Crimewatch. It was another reason that confirmed to me they had nothing to do with Madeline's disappearance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The one 8,472 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 Just doing a bit or reading.. Apparently they can only be charged with abandonment in Portugal if they admit it was wilful, ie they knew they were going to put their kids in danger. Would that explain why they have never appeared to be sorry or said they feel guilty about leaving her alone? Maybe they've been advised to NEVER publicly say they feel guilty or express regret for leaving them because it would imply they knew they'd f****d up and then it could lead to them being jailed? I still maintain they would still be in possession of all three kids if they hadn't of left them.. Very plausible that. Surprised I've not read it elsewhere. Probably cause there's more stuff on trying to convict them than help then. I come in peace Lab... .......I don't want convictions I want some answerers. Why would a mother leave her children at such a young age when shes waited for 5 years to become pregnant through IVF.? And when it turns out there was a night cresh for the kids a few streets away ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ArchieHood 3,692 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 Exactly archie, tbh I think they were more of a status symbol than anything and now she has become a publicity thing. Thousands of kids are lost yearly yet none stay in the press for 6 years, why has she? Because it takes the guilt away from her parents. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The one 8,472 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 Im surprised they let him back to being a doctor in this country after he was away from doctoring after maddy was snatched it would have been a ideal time to get rid of him because people must think hes guilty Quote Link to post Share on other sites
South hams hunter 8,921 Posted October 15, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 Exactly archie, tbh I think they were more of a status symbol than anything and now she has become a publicity thing. Thousands of kids are lost yearly yet none stay in the press for 6 years, why has she? Because it takes the guilt away from her parents. exactly archie, non guilty parents are forgotten in months if not weeks Quote Link to post Share on other sites
robin hood 109 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 Ive just watched Crimewatch as i had it recordered and ive no changed my mind They left the kids every night and went to the same tapas bar anybody could have clicked on to there routine If that happened here they would of been jailed and there twins put into foster care Why is our police doing a two year investigation it happened abroad and who's footing the bill the British tax payer After watching the programme where he did nearly all the talking and she stared about the place i have a hard job believing there innocent And talking to somebody they reckon they left the kids alone all the time and they made a mistake doping maddy i thought the same she looked like shed been around the block, he looked guilty as sin,description looks like him as well Quote Link to post Share on other sites
loafer 47 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 If you put your need.s before your children.s then your not parenting properly simple. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Waz 4,252 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 8.16 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,687 Posted October 15, 2013 Report Share Posted October 15, 2013 More than % of that makes no sense why the should go to jail. what about the other 20%. ffs. leaving three kids under four home alone resulting in the dissapearance or worse of one child. even though a childcare facility was provided . are you for real.Lab. why are folk trying to defend the indefencable.?? Because I believe that they thought that there children would be perfectly safe. As did there friends around the dinner table. It's a matter of choice and it's turned out the wrong choice for them, I'm sure if they could do it again they would do it different. I'm not defending there choice I'm just pointing out that I think they've had enough mud thrown at them. Seems to me it's went from child neglect to murderers as the Chinese whispers went on. A matter of choice?......we are talking about kids not a pair of f***ing shoes! Every parent in the world sometimes wishes they could just go off and do whatever they feel like without having to think about anything else but you can't because that little person relies on you for safety and security......there is no other choice ! 11 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.