ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 i love all politicians, especially on here Sat on the fence! Old school Liberal Democrat! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
neems 2,406 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 Hitler got rid of democracy,because it doesn't work,some life long dole drawing retard should not be allowed that responsibility. libertarianism without democracy is anarchy isnt it? He got rid of it because he was a power hungry tosspot (typical politician) Libertarianism preaches individual liberty above all. A small government tightly controlled by the people (fundamentals of democracy.) Libertarianism wouldn't allow a life long dole drawing retard because, by it's very nature, it removes government structure. Anarchy is no government, at all. So how do the people 'tightly' control the government if not democratically? Democracy is as open to abuse as any other system,and if the government isn't elected it would be 'totalitarian' wouldn't it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
just jack 998 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 i'm more concerned about green peace /pirates what do you reckon about putin locking these people up for many many years 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 i'm more concerned about green peace /pirates what do you reckon about putin locking these people up for many many years should think themselfs lucky. cpl decades ago they be slung in the lubyanka and never heard of again lol 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
just jack 998 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 i'm more concerned about green peace /pirates what do you reckon about putin locking these people up for many many years should think themselfs lucky. cpl decades ago they be slung in the lubyanka and never heard of again lol nice gaff have you been evicted yet scot Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 i'm more concerned about green peace /pirates what do you reckon about putin locking these people up for many many years should think themselfs lucky. cpl decades ago they be slung in the lubyanka and never heard of again lol nice gaff have you been evicted yet scot you lost me? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
just jack 998 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 i'm more concerned about green peace /pirates what do you reckon about putin locking these people up for many many years should think themselfs lucky. cpl decades ago they be slung in the lubyanka and never heard of again lol nice gaff have you been evicted yet scot you lost me? lubyanka ffs Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 lol it was the evicted bit i didnt get mate got you now lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
just jack 998 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 lol it was the evicted bit i didnt get mate got you now lol did i spell it wrong Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 He got rid of it because he was a power hungry tosspot (typical politician) Libertarianism preaches individual liberty above all. A small government tightly controlled by the people (fundamentals of democracy.) Libertarianism wouldn't allow a life long dole drawing retard because, by it's very nature, it removes government structure. Anarchy is no government, at all. So how do the people 'tightly' control the government if not democratically? Democracy is as open to abuse as any other system,and if the government isn't elected it would be 'totalitarian' wouldn't it? Democratically... like I said... All system of government is open to abuse, which is why libertarianism keeps it small, and under control. Less government, for the people, by the people. People seem to lose sight of the fact that governments are supposed to work for us, not the other way around. They're elected to serve a purpose. Not to sit round all day, on my money, dreaming up ways for me to obey. f**k no. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
foxtails 272 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 after all iv said, ......im not at ...all rasist.. BUT hitler - he had the right idea, just the wrong way about going about it ! naaaaa he had a silly mustache and liked shepherds lol, yep but still he had the right idea, not all of his ideas for sure thats a fact, but he had a part of his mind that was true to a good cause! he just lost control of that, and went about things in the wrong way, i can not stand what he did to all of those jews, it makes me sick to this day, but he could see this very day coming all those years ago ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
neems 2,406 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 He got rid of it because he was a power hungry tosspot (typical politician) Libertarianism preaches individual liberty above all. A small government tightly controlled by the people (fundamentals of democracy.) Libertarianism wouldn't allow a life long dole drawing retard because, by it's very nature, it removes government structure. Anarchy is no government, at all. So how do the people 'tightly' control the government if not democratically?Democracy is as open to abuse as any other system,and if the government isn't elected it would be 'totalitarian' wouldn't it? Democratically... like I said... All system of government is open to abuse, which is why libertarianism keeps it small, and under control. Less government, for the people, by the people. People seem to lose sight of the fact that governments are supposed to work for us, not the other way around. They're elected to serve a purpose. Not to sit round all day, on my money, dreaming up ways for me to obey. f**k no. then even in an ideal world you would be electing unqualified people,realistically it's just a popularity contest of who gets to represent zog. They would soon gain just as much power as they feel they need. At the end of the day it's only revolutions that can change a governments,democracy is just a way to make you think you have any say in the way the country's run. If we were 1 nation fighting and working toward a common goal,we could achieve more and ensure our survival as a race. We've been shown the way now we just have to implement it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
keepdiggin 9,559 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 i love all politicians, especially on here you can spot the boys that come from a private school no matter how hard they try to be jack the lad lol. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dosser 52 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 You cant realy have a debate on this subject without talking about the central banks and money as debt. Is it coincidence that were told muslims are public enemy number one and the fact that islam outlaws usury.? The best exploration of the most beneficial system for the people (imho) http://www.geocities.com/Athens/8744/readgb.htm Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 love how hitler takes the flak for everything bad lol Forgetting one thing lads.The SS yes they were loyal and swore a personal oath to thier fuhrer,but make no mistake they were the real power.Hitler knew this to.The SA were wiped out in a night.Rohm was an old friend of hitler and he didnt get a pass either. The german people and the SS would have and did follow hitler into the abyss,but make no mistake the SS were on a mission and no one was going to get in there way.All the top tier nazis knew this and went along with it.There a lot of cases where the SS had carte blanche and hitler was blamed. The T4 programme for one,hyjacked by himmler and heydrich.more so heydrich, and himmler although head of the SS was playing second fiddle to heydrich.in fact he was the one who would have replaced hitler. The british knew he was a danger and hence the czech hit team to assasinate him. Operation foxley (assasination of hitler) was dropped as it was deemed if they managed to actually kill hitler,then heydrich would have been in charge and he wouldnt have made the monumental blunders that old adolf was making on a regular basis.hitler was the figurehead of national socialisim and had a nation that idolised him,but the real power was held by the SS,and it suited them to have hitler in charge of the show. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.