gnasher16 30,063 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 What about kids that born black,, or half cast, and never met there black parant,,, in other words an English kid,, but with brown skin?,,,,,, they had no choise in there skin colour,,, I think its an " ideal " Tomo...........its not going to happen but i agree with it in principal...... i think most of us in an ideal world want to live amongst our own sort.... i think thats perfectly natural.......being respectful to you mate as i know your own situation from previous posts.......but would you want to share your life and raise kids with a full blown zulu straight out the woods and expect to get on like a house on fire.....i cant think of anything more unnatural !...................ok people have been diluted down now but it still go,s back to the same ideal that some people just find unnacceptable.......in principal. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
neems 2,406 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 I think we'd have to be even more extreme to stand a chance. After all Hitler lost the war against Jewry when it wasn't as well established as it is now. But he started a great movement creating the most advanced society to have ever existed from a small party of 6 members,and with nationalist movements springing up all over the world we can always support the best of those. The NSDAP did indeed get every body back into work and redistributed the wealth as such ( unless of course your name was Krupp, Thyssen or Ford) but the work wasn't exactly what people bargained for ! Lol lol The civil jobs it created were mostly very low paid indeed. I have no time for socialism in any of its forms as it will always involve suppressing the freedom of the people in one way or another. Liberty and individual responsability is the way forward IMHO Anyway, tommy is a bell end and so are most of these latter day boot boys Libertarianism is all well and good until we have tens of billions of people all going about destroying the planet in their own way unregulated. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 Libertarianism is all well and good until we have tens of billions of people all going about destroying the planet in their own way unregulated. How does the current system differ from this? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
neems 2,406 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 Libertarianism is all well and good until we have tens of billions of people all going about destroying the planet in their own way unregulated. How does the current system differ from this? There aren't tens of billions of people yet,also luckily most 3rd worlders still can't afford any environmentally unfriendly tech yet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 (edited) There aren't tens of billions of people yet,also luckily most 3rd worlders still can't afford any environmentally unfriendly tech yet. Agreed but they're well on the way? That's under the current system. Socialism is a failure. Communism is a failure. National socialism is a failure. Centre left Labour. Failure. Centre right Conservative, failure. It seems all the systems that we've allowed to tried have all done untold damage to the planet, and are continuing to do so. Government gets bigger all the time. The bill to fund it seems to grow disproportionately to it. Libertarianism hasn't been tried. It subscribes to smaller government and greater person freedom. We've tried every other clusterfuck of a political system, and the tried and tested results, of failure, seem to correspond with the increasing size of government. Maybe the problems being caused are the downside to the amount of people in government, and the amount of people using shit tonnes of money to influence government decision? If we take away this bloated government. It's perks. It's kickbacks, and it's continual screw of individual freedoms, what could happen that hasn't happened already? Shit it may even work! Vote Libertarian! Edited October 9, 2013 by ChrisJones 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
neems 2,406 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 National socialism worked,it was just defeated by man kinds cancer,the eternal jew. Libertarianism has been tried,from the old school liberals of the USA to the anarchists of Russia,it had some success but its time has passed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,702 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 I think we'd have to be even more extreme to stand a chance. After all Hitler lost the war against Jewry when it wasn't as well established as it is now. But he started a great movement creating the most advanced society to have ever existed from a small party of 6 members,and with nationalist movements springing up all over the world we can always support the best of those. The NSDAP did indeed get every body back into work and redistributed the wealth as such ( unless of course your name was Krupp, Thyssen or Ford) but the work wasn't exactly what people bargained for ! Lol lol The civil jobs it created were mostly very low paid indeed. I have no time for socialism in any of its forms as it will always involve suppressing the freedom of the people in one way or another. Liberty and individual responsability is the way forward IMHO Anyway, tommy is a bell end and so are most of these latter day boot boys Libertarianism is all well and good until we have tens of billions of people all going about destroying the planet in their own way unregulated. Who decides what's right for me in this totalitarian utopia you speak of?......is it the Tommy Robinsons or Nick Griffins of this world? Two blokes who couldn't find their arse with both hands? I don't want any f****r telling me how to think or feel or what I can make jokes about.......I just want to be left alone to raise my English family like an Englishman, I want to keep nearly all the money I earn to do that and I want nothing from the state.....not much to ask is it If you allowed more folk to be like that the ethnic minorities wouldn't even have a foot in the door, it would just be mostly indigenous people cracking on......IMHO 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 National socialism worked,it was just defeated by man kinds cancer,the eternal jew. Libertarianism has been tried,from the old school liberals of the USA to the anarchists of Russia,it had some success but its time has passed. National Socialism lasted 12 years. They promised everything and ended up with a state that was utterly ruled by the German government. Typical bullshit politician. It was a brief experiment showing that totalitarianism doesn't work either. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 National socialism worked,it was just defeated by man kinds cancer,the eternal jew. Libertarianism has been tried,from the old school liberals of the USA to the anarchists of Russia,it had some success but its time has passed. National Socialism lasted 12 years. They promised everything and ended up with a state that was utterly ruled by the German government. Typical bullshit politician. It was a brief experiment showing that totalitarianism doesn't work either. but what a 12 year it was lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jessdale 416 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 "tommy leaves the edl", a headline that has the same impact as "border collie on a skateboard" and " fallen tree breaks shed window". 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,702 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 Socialism relies on big government which needs a voter base to give it a veneer of democracy. It buys this voter base from the poorest in society by taking peoples money away and using it as a bribe for its voter base Throw in a few of the right "sound bites" to appeal to the current voter thinking (backed up of course by carefully released press stories) and you back in your office every 5 years As the voter base in this country and Europe became more affluent all of a sudden the socialists found themselves in trouble.......they were becoming surplus to requirements so what do you do? You import a big heap of poor from the 3rd world and the eastern block, then take the affluent peoples money away in buckets to give to the immigrants........everyones poor again, they all "need" you again and so you are powerful once more State handouts in any form when people rely on them, be it the conservatives, labour, the NSDAP or the monster raving loony party, transfer massive influence over peoples lives........it empowers politicians and makes the ordinary man weak 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
neems 2,406 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 Hitler got rid of democracy,because it doesn't work,some life long dole drawing retard should not be allowed that responsibility. libertarianism without democracy is anarchy isnt it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 Hitler got rid of democracy,because it doesn't work,some life long dole drawing retard should not be allowed that responsibility. libertarianism without democracy is anarchy isnt it? He got rid of it because he was a power hungry tosspot (typical politician) Libertarianism preaches individual liberty above all. A small government tightly controlled by the people (fundamentals of democracy.) Libertarianism wouldn't allow a life long dole drawing retard because, by it's very nature, it removes government structure. Anarchy is no government, at all. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,702 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 Hitler got rid of democracy,because it doesn't work,some life long dole drawing retard should not be allowed that responsibility. libertarianism without democracy is anarchy isnt it? Adolf played a political blinder after a few failed attempts, the allies provided very fertile soil by imposing ridiculous war reperations and raping Germany. He so loved his country that he almost had it wiped off the face of the earth, power.......power to impose his political vision over the whole of his country and dress it up as "love" for his people I bet if you had asked half the soldiers on the eastern front what they thought of Adolf they would have told you a thing or two Quote Link to post Share on other sites
just jack 998 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 i love all politicians, especially on here 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.