Hot Meat 3,109 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 2 dogs tho in same spots? And why did they at they asked for the dogs, then when they got the marks they tried to discredit them? Likeable said, only asking about what Iv read Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dare 1,103 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 Why would you refuse to answer questions? You would be so angry to even be accused you'd be shouting to blue in the face. And why would you leave the twins in the room when you believe one of your children has been taken? If you don't believe they done if just curious as to what you think happened? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted October 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 you can bet a pound to a pail of shite,no matter what is said tonight on crimewatch,they wont be criticised or made to look bad., he wouldnt be so quick to discredit the dogs if had been some other c**ts hired car i bet. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 Whichever way you look at it, the dog was trained to mark dead bodies and did so in both the apartment behind the sofa and in the boot of the car. The other dog marked blood behind the sofa and in the boot of the car....blood can be explained, kids are always grazing their legs, cuts etc...but explaining dead bodies? C'mon man... And these cadaver dogs are renowned for their reliability are they? Never give a false mark? Quickly reading up on it apparently the dog searched the car, walked away only to be directed back to it by the handler to then gave a mark...... should have used whippets Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scothunter 12,609 Posted October 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 i was going to say bullx but thought i would catch some flak for it lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tiercel 6,986 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 Why would you refuse to answer questions? You would be so angry to even be accused you'd be shouting to blue in the face. And why would you leave the twins in the room when you believe one of your children has been taken? If you don't believe they done if just curious as to what you think happened? Perhaps you might be shouting till your blue in the face, but under the instructions of her solicitor she wisley in my opinion stuck to no comment. If the twins were an intended target also when madiline went missing. Surly they would have been taken at the same time? As to what has happened? As I stated earlier I have a gut feeling that they are not complicit with the child going missing, however I do not have a clue what actually happened the same as the rest of us. TC Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RubyTex 1,957 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 Whichever way you look at it, the dog was trained to mark dead bodies and did so in both the apartment behind the sofa and in the boot of the car. The other dog marked blood behind the sofa and in the boot of the car....blood can be explained, kids are always grazing their legs, cuts etc...but explaining dead bodies? C'mon man... And these cadaver dogs are renowned for their reliability are they? Never give a false mark? Quickly reading up on it apparently the dog searched the car, walked away only to be directed back to it by the handler to then gave a mark...... Well they are trained to detect bodies so i'd say pretty reliable. One dog can make a mistake. Two dogs marking the same locations? Unlikely to be a mistake. Don't get me wrong i wish the young lass was back home safe and sound but to me it stinks. The McCann's allowed the dogs to be used thinking nothing would be picked up and it would give weight to their argument...unfortunately the dogs picked up blood and where a body had been in TWO separate locations so the McCann's came straight out with them dogs are unreliable. I don't see how you can discredit what is IMO concrete evidence. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pegleg33 134 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 Is Kate McCann in the MILF thread?. I'd bang a confession out of her 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dare 1,103 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 Why would you refuse to answer questions? You would be so angry to even be accused you'd be shouting to blue in the face. And why would you leave the twins in the room when you believe one of your children has been taken? If you don't believe they done if just curious as to what you think happened? Perhaps you might be shouting till your blue in the face, but under the instructions of her solicitor she wisley in my opinion stuck to no comment. If the twins were an intended target also when madiline went missing. Surly they would have been taken at the same time? As to what has happened? As I stated earlier I have a gut feeling that they are not complicit with the child going missing, however I do not have a clue what actually happened the same as the rest of us. TC But you've just noticed your child is gone? You wouldn't dare leave your other children after that. Let alone be calm enough to think the others wasnt the target. Yeah end of the the day well never know for sure. Hope she's alive and well even if I don't believe so. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 47,183 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 "Mummy........Mmmmuuuummmyyy........"Can you hear me mummy?" "Oh Maddie.......Maddie darling.....Mummys here......is that you Maddie" "Nah....its only me Gerry, I am just f***ing about" 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dare 1,103 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 My mate had a go at me for constantly thinking up new Madeleine McCann jokes. He said, "Just leave her alone!" I replied, "But, that's how the whole problem started." 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Tiercel 6,986 Posted October 10, 2013 Report Share Posted October 10, 2013 Why would you refuse to answer questions? You would be so angry to even be accused you'd be shouting to blue in the face. And why would you leave the twins in the room when you believe one of your children has been taken? If you don't believe they done if just curious as to what you think happened? Perhaps you might be shouting till your blue in the face, but under the instructions of her solicitor she wisley in my opinion stuck to no comment. If the twins were an intended target also when madiline went missing. Surly they would have been taken at the same time? As to what has happened? As I stated earlier I have a gut feeling that they are not complicit with the child going missing, however I do not have a clue what actually happened the same as the rest of us. TC But you've just noticed your child is gone? You wouldn't dare leave your other children after that. Let alone be calm enough to think the others wasnt the target. Yeah end of the the day well never know for sure. Hope she's alive and well even if I don't believe so. Personally i would have taken them with me, but that is just me and it is easy to say after the fact when you have had time to think. The difference between my self and her is she is trained to keep calm in high pressure situations I am not and would have just acted out of instinct. TC Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.