Guest nitevision Posted August 29, 2007 Report Share Posted August 29, 2007 have any of the other sites who had similar posts been contacted by browns broadcasting corp.i can understand the thread being pulled,but it wont hurt to have the mugs mug up for all to see. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 Its still up on numerous sites...... Link to them. There is no law against that. Their grievance is with the use of the picture and The Hunting Life cannot be held responsible for the content of external sites. Posting this man's picture is good for us because it blows his cover when they try to bring their politically correct agenda back to hunting. The more people, in the hunting community, that know what he looks like the better. That way he can't get inside and print lies about our perfectly legal activity. Threatening him is f*****g stupid and makes us look like a bunch of c**ts. Exclusion is the best way to deal with these meddling f**k wits because he won't have anything to report this would mean he would have to invent the story from scratch like the rest of the lying fuckers. Remember this. They tried to ban hunting but they couldn't. They made such a f**k up of it, it made us a laughing stock across the world. Now they wish to meddle further. Make no mistake. Our community is being infiltrated by journalists, police officers, antis and every other do gooder you can think of. They're here. They're watching and they're collecting as much information on as many people as they can. Think about this before you post because it can be used against you no matter how anonymous you think you are. Anyone that still has the picture should keep it. Remember the face, and distribute it privately. They have their 'intelligence' but they still under estimate that we have ours too. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 Okay. Send me the link, through PM, and I'll make sure the people that need to know, get them. If Ian doesn't want it, that's fine, it doesn't have to happen here but rest assured there are many who want to see these people exposed and the private database is getting larger all the time. They may be infiltrating us but we're infiltrating them. We know alot more than we did but every little helps. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest nitevision Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 surely its about time we got as organised against those against us,cant be that hard can it,infiltration can work both ways Quote Link to post Share on other sites
speedlamper 0 Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 seeing as our tv licence pays his wages does that not give us the right to know who we are technically employing Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mistwalker 0 Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 Well, I'll be the first to publicly apoligise for my comments. I understood that he had been secretly filming legitimate hunters and making it look like they were breaking the law. Sitting watching the programme just now, I reckon the guy did a good job. As a hunter, I believe that any animal deserves a quick and painless death and endeavour to ensure this happens whenever I hunt. How anyone can enjoy watching two dogs (which they've raised from a puppy as we do our hunting dogs - forming a strong, loving bond) ripping each other apart for up to 45 mins (one fight on the programme) disgusts me. As a dog owner and dog lover, like many on here, the thought of my dogs being hurt in anyway scares the hell out of me and I cannot understand anyone who believes this to be acceptable. So, let's keep it safe, keep it legal, love our dogs who love us so much and treat them with the love and respect they deserve. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
IanB 0 Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 Lets face it, this guy is going to be forever looking over his back for the rest of his life...they have achieved a documentary on dog fighting, naming and shaming people...but at a cost, this blokes basically cannon fodder... With regard to dog fighting obviously its illegal within the UK, but the breed on a whole seems to get more than its fair share of bad press, when many other breeds are more than capable of harm, I'm sure statistics will show this...they've broadcast to the public, and got a point of view across, but I doubt it will stop these type of people who are involved going about their daily business as normal, not a cat in hells chance... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hob&Jill 258 Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 (edited) Well, I'll be the first to publicly apoligise for my comments. I understood that he had been secretly filming legitimate hunters and making it look like they were breaking the law. Sitting watching the programme just now, I reckon the guy did a good job. As a hunter, I believe that any animal deserves a quick and painless death and endeavour to ensure this happens whenever I hunt. How anyone can enjoy watching two dogs (which they've raised from a puppy as we do our hunting dogs - forming a strong, loving bond) ripping each other apart for up to 45 mins (one fight on the programme) disgusts me. As a dog owner and dog lover, like many on here, the thought of my dogs being hurt in anyway scares the hell out of me and I cannot understand anyone who believes this to be acceptable.So, let's keep it safe, keep it legal, love our dogs who love us so much and treat them with the love and respect they deserve. Well said I agree with you 100% Hunting people and dog fighters should never be associated together Edit> I agree this guy is going to be looking over his back for a long time though Edited August 30, 2007 by Hob&Jill Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jultaylor1972 2 Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 And I agree 100% also. I totally disagree with dog fighting and to be honest.. Good on him for exposing the cruel ba*****s Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest WILF Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 (edited) Mistwalker..........dont you realise, to these people your just as cruel as them blokes you have just condemed with your rather unhelpfull comments. "I dont like what that bloke does, but what I do is fine" ............bollocks man.......I am no fan of fighting dogs..........but I will not condem blokes that test dogs.....end of! If its a fair and sporting test and not baiting then whats the difference..........what the feck makes you any different........ Do you allso condem all the people who go about legitimate terrier work? Feck!!........talk about devide and rule Just reading the other replys.........what a bunch of hypocritical feckers...........all feck off to "PET RESCUE.COM".........FECKERS Edited August 30, 2007 by WILF Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest JDF Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 well said that man Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mistwalker 0 Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 They key word you used there Wilf is 'Legitimate' Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blaze 49 Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 Mistwalker..........dont you realise, to these people your just as cruel as them blokes you have just condemed with your rather unhelpfull comments. "I dont like what that bloke does, but what I do is fine" ............bollocks man.......I am no fan of fighting dogs..........but I will not condem blokes that test dogs.....end of! If its a fair and sporting test and not baiting then whats the difference..........what the feck makes you any different........ Do you allso condem all the people who go about legitimate terrier work? Feck!!........talk about devide and rule Just reading the other replys.........what a bunch of hypocritical feckers...........all feck off to "PET RESCUE.COM".........FECKERS You spoke my mind! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest WILF Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 They key word you used there Wilf is 'Legitimate' Nothing personal.......but dont be so fecking nieve man.........thats just silly Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest lurchers n lamps Posted August 30, 2007 Report Share Posted August 30, 2007 my thinking exactly hunters dont go out to be crule to animals. what them people did on that programe was just crule Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.