No Military Intervention On Syria From The Uk

[tandors 888]

Ffs israels pet the usa are going to attack syria in support of known terrorist groups who they have been fighting for a decade lol. From a long distance where there can be no realistic retaliation. Doesn't seem fair to me.

[gonetoearth 5,144]

They carnt hide the airforce in houses. The yanks will target air defence and high calibre targets. Jam the comunictions etc etc. drones will play a big part Spy sats will be watching every thing. When the yanks play the have some fooking toys

[Born Hunter 17,751]

Ffs israels pet the usa are going to attack syria in support of known terrorist groups who they have been fighting for a decade lol. From a long distance where there can be no realistic retaliation. Doesn't seem fair to me.

 

It's not supposed to be fair.

 

It's supposed to be tactical and clinical.

 

You say the US is a Jewish pawn and yet the CIA consider the Jewish state one of their highest espionage threats, up there with Iran, Russia, China, N.Korea and Cuba. Not to mention Obama's stance on the state. I just don't buy it.

 

And aren't there terrorists on both sides of the equation?

Edited September 3, 2013 by Born Hunter

[scothunter 12,609]

couldnt give a flying f**k about any of that shit over there.were not in it. wonder what putins next move will be.whatever it is i bet no one will see it coming

[scothunter 12,609]

 

Ffs israels pet the usa are going to attack syria in support of known terrorist groups who they have been fighting for a decade lol. From a long distance where there can be no realistic retaliation. Doesn't seem fair to me.

 

It's not supposed to be fair.

 

It's supposed to be tactical and clinical.

 

You say the US is a Jewish pawn and yet the CIA consider the Jewish state one of their highest espionage threats, up there with Iran, Russia, China, N.Korea and Cuba. Not to mention Obama's stance on the state. I just don't buy it.

 

And aren't there terrorists on both sides of the equation?

 

got to disagree bud,dont care what the cia think of the kikes,i can assure you it will make no diffrence to the congress.the jews could run about with arabs kids heads on pikes and america will back them up. they dont have any other option but to side with the christ killers.

[paulus 26]

http://tomohalloran.com/2013/08/30/saudis-go-on-full-alert-as-putin-war-threat-stuns-muslim-world/

[Malt 379]

http://tomohalloran.com/2013/08/30/saudis-go-on-full-alert-as-putin-war-threat-stuns-muslim-world/

They really will light the fires of hell if they attack Saudi.. If there's one thing that will unite the Muslim world like no other it would be that..

[Born Hunter 17,751]

http://tomohalloran.com/2013/08/30/saudis-go-on-full-alert-as-putin-war-threat-stuns-muslim-world/

 

Bullshit! That's wayyyyy too bold a move for the Russians. They want to stay out of all this shit not start a world war.

[paulus 26]

 

http://tomohalloran.com/2013/08/30/saudis-go-on-full-alert-as-putin-war-threat-stuns-muslim-world/

They really will light the fires of hell if they attack Saudi.. If there's one thing that will unite the Muslim world like no other it would be that..

 

 

 

 

http://tomohalloran.com/2013/08/30/saudis-go-on-full-alert-as-putin-war-threat-stuns-muslim-world/

 

Bullshit! That's wayyyyy too bold a move for the Russians. They want to stay out of all this shit not start a world war.

 

scary shit though

[Nik_B 3,790]

Sounds like bollocks to me lol

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10285341/Vladimir-Putin-says-Russia-could-back-Syria-intervention-if-UN-approves.html

[Born Hunter 17,751]

Sounds like bollocks to me lol

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10285341/Vladimir-Putin-says-Russia-could-back-Syria-intervention-if-UN-approves.html

 

I've found it difficult to dissagree with anything that man has said on this issue. Seems to be the voice of reason in all this.

 

Wouldn't we look like utter fools if evidence was brought to the UN and a resolution backed by the Russians was enacted! I'd hope for the sake of our pride that sniveling little prick Milliband would change his tune.

[Malt 379]

 

Sounds like bollocks to me lol

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10285341/Vladimir-Putin-says-Russia-could-back-Syria-intervention-if-UN-approves.html

 

I've found it difficult to dissagree with anything that man has said on this issue. Seems to be the voice of reason in all this.

 

Wouldn't we look like utter fools if evidence was brought to the UN and a resolution backed by the Russians was enacted! I'd hope for the sake of our pride that sniveling little prick Milliband would change his tune.

Well that's a bit catch 22 if you ask me, any UN action would need the approval of Russia anyway!

[Born Hunter 17,751]

 

 

Sounds like bollocks to me lol

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10285341/Vladimir-Putin-says-Russia-could-back-Syria-intervention-if-UN-approves.html

I've found it difficult to dissagree with anything that man has said on this issue. Seems to be the voice of reason in all this.

 

Wouldn't we look like utter fools if evidence was brought to the UN and a resolution backed by the Russians was enacted! I'd hope for the sake of our pride that sniveling little prick Milliband would change his tune.

Well that's a bit catch 22 if you ask me, any UN action would need the approval of Russia anyway!

 

 

But that's the significant part, the Russians have said they will do something that we won't, take action if evidence is provided. IMO that's just sensible and the responsibility of the UN. Why the hell are we even part of the council otherwise?

 

The whole things been dealt with poorly by us.

[Malt 379]

I agree mate, we should be looking at things with the same perspective as the Russians if nothing else.. Are we going to veto any UN resolution authorising force seeing as how our parliment has voted against it, or will we just sit down and watch from the sidelines?

[Born Hunter 17,751]

I agree mate, we should be looking at things with the same perspective as the Russians if nothing else.. Are we going to veto any UN resolution authorising force seeing as how our parliment has voted against it, or will we just sit down and watch from the sidelines?

 

I think that may test the UK-US relationship a bit too much. If undisputable evidence was brought to the UN that the Assad regime was responsible for the chemical attacks then I reckon British parliament may be changing their tune to save face. We could not just sit by while a Russian and American coalition took action! Madness!

 

That requires considerable evidence of responsibility first though................