Jump to content

Breeding Lurchers From Scratch


Recommended Posts

 

 

this is probably gonna throw the proverbial cat amongst it but.........hancock has successfully been doing it for decades with 3 breeds (greyhound, beardie and border), he has 1st x's, 2nd x's, 3/8 one way, 3/8 the other, reverse 3/4, 7/16 x 9/16th just about every permeation, guys are breeding his dogs together and producing dogs that both look and act like lurchers and have been bred from lurchers

Without turning this into a hancock thread. We are talking breeding from dogs which are tested or at least worked to a standard the breeder wants, more than likely excluding the the F1 parents :thumbs:

 

that'll be under...........'guys are breeding his dogs together and producing dogs that both look and act like lurchers', there are guys that work his dogs

 

 

The thread is about people breeding with a type in mind and doing it from scratch.. Sourcing the correct ingredients and breeding by sorting the wheat from the chaff until the correct outcome is hopefully attained or not.

I doubt 'Mr H' is breeding with this wholeheartedly in mind.

As for lads starting with two of his F1 as a baseline, they are kind of cheating by skipping the first step :laugh:

 

Disclaimer ( The words above are not to imply or state that hancocks dogs cannot be good or are inferior in anyway) :laugh:

Edited by Sirius
  • Like 1
Link to post

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Yeah,..several times during my life,..I have had an urge to do something along those lines..but,..it is a long road and is, in my opinion,..a young man's game...   The first thing to consider is,..w

I don't think new breeds should be deliberately created , they are usually money or vanity driven projects that tend to replicate , with slight variations , whats already there . Breed dogs that are g

Had a good chat this evening regarding this subject, its not the line or blood that's the hard work.its getting lads to stick to the "life plan"..

 

 

 

 

The good thing about breeding greyhounds i suppose is there at least a lot of data to go by and not just exaggerated stories of performance. Do you think that in reality there are very few good breeders of Greyhounds and who know and have access to the right lines?I suppose also the diffrence in open class and a grader isnt that great and a lot is in the fine detail with a Greyhound,whereas variables in a family of say rabbiting lurchers might even be useful when being kept has a team.

 

 

As you say there is little between a grader and an open class grey when seen in the light of how that difference would impact on a lurcher. As to variance in lurchers it brings in what people want/call a lurcher. What i would want compared to say the "first cross Heeler/ Greyhound, to a first cross Collie/Greyhound" that PH prefers would be very different but it's always horses for courses. If I were to breed a line it would be racy but with a little strength, others would go for what they need be it brains, stamina etc. Pretty much any racer that completed a career on the track would be a good start as it would bring speed, powerful heart and general exceptional physicality to which a breeder could add/take away with what traits/breeds they were interested in.

 

 

Edited by sandymere
Link to post

does hancock breed and his customers test, the goog ones getting bred from? we are told when creating a strain or type its a numbers game, are his customers merely paying for the priveledge? has he not been ruthless, culling inferior stock not worth breeding from (i'm thinking about some of the proposed studs that were never used or used and found wanting) ?

Link to post

does hancock breed and his customers test, the goog ones getting bred from? we are told when creating a strain or type its a numbers game, are his customers merely paying for the priveledge? has he not been ruthless, culling inferior stock not worth breeding from (i'm thinking about some of the proposed studs that were never used or used and found wanting) ?

 

Even the mention of hancock can spoil a topic :sorry:

  • Like 2
Link to post

I don't get why anyone would want or need to do this?

 

Say you've got in mind what you want the end result to be.

 

Why not take 2 dogs that are similar to what you've got in mind. Doing what you've got in mind and breed them?

 

Unless I'm missing the point? Why start from scratch?

 

I like water. Bottled water. I aren't going to start collecting rain water and sterilising it myself and bottling it in the hope of achieving bottled water similar to what's at tesco.

 

I guess you could argue sense of achievement doing it yourself? Maybe?

Link to post

I don't get why anyone would want or need to do this?

 

Say you've got in mind what you want the end result to be.

 

Why not take 2 dogs that are similar to what you've got in mind. Doing what you've got in mind and breed them?

 

Unless I'm missing the point? Why start from scratch?

 

I like water. Bottled water. I aren't going to start collecting rain water and sterilising it myself and bottling it in the hope of achieving bottled water similar to what's at tesco.

 

I guess you could argue sense of achievement doing it yourself? Maybe?

Unless you have an ACCURATE history of the 2 dogs breeding,even if they looked identical,the litter could be produce anything from 21 inch smooth coats to 28 inch rough,and nothing that was like either :thumbs:

Link to post

 

 

I don't get why anyone would want or need to do this?

 

Say you've got in mind what you want the end result to be.

 

Why not take 2 dogs that are similar to what you've got in mind. Doing what you've got in mind and breed them?

 

Unless I'm missing the point? Why start from scratch?

 

I like water. Bottled water. I aren't going to start collecting rain water and sterilising it myself and bottling it in the hope of achieving bottled water similar to what's at tesco.

 

I guess you could argue sense of achievement doing it yourself? Maybe?

Unless you have an ACCURATE history of the 2 dogs breeding,even if they looked identical,the litter could be produce anything from 21 inch smooth coats to 28 inch rough,and nothing that was like either :thumbs:

Ok fair point.

Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...