Jump to content

Dew Claws


Recommended Posts

On or of?

I've always left them on because they're there for a reason and help the dog make those tight turns, i have never had to trim them which i think proves just how much the dogs use them. I used to corse a lot and rarely had any injuries to them, no more than any other toe or claw But most litters I see for sale now have had them removed? What's the thinking behind this?

Link to post

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The dewclaws do not make contact with the ground in most cases. They don't assist with turning and are considered a weak digit that if left on will cause problems.   My bitch has got hers and we ha

if there no good why are they born with them...there must be some rason for them.

There is no way a dew claw helps a dog turn. FFS. All these top coursing lads breeding pups fetching thousands at a few months old wouldnt be removing the dew claws if they helped the dog turn.   An

Posted Images

The dewclaws do not make contact with the ground in most cases. They don't assist with turning and are considered a weak digit that if left on will cause problems.

 

My bitch has got hers and we have no end of trouble with her catching them.

 

When I have a litter they will be coming straight off.

  • Like 3
Link to post

My bitch had em on and I had no end of hassle with her either splitting the nail next to the nail bed or twisting them clean off. Enough was enough the vet removed them last Thursday. All be it my bank balance is £260 lighter but the bitch will be better off without them in the long run. If I had a litter they would be coming off for sure..

 

Atb

Link to post

My bitch had em on and I had no end of hassle with her either splitting the nail next to the nail bed or twisting them clean off. Enough was enough the vet removed them last Thursday. All be it my bank balance is £260 lighter but the bitch will be better off without them in the long run. If I had a litter they would be coming off for sure..

 

Atb

do you use that vet all the time mate had his dogs dewclaws off and a few stiches on a cut £135 big difference to £260

Link to post

 

My bitch had em on and I had no end of hassle with her either splitting the nail next to the nail bed or twisting them clean off. Enough was enough the vet removed them last Thursday. All be it my bank balance is £260 lighter but the bitch will be better off without them in the long run. If I had a litter they would be coming off for sure..

 

Atb

do you use that vet all the time mate had his dogs dewclaws off and a few stiches on a cut £135 big difference to £260

 

i think the point is, if whoever bred that litter had taken the trouble to remove them. then there would have been no cost at all :yes:

Link to post

 

 

My bitch had em on and I had no end of hassle with her either splitting the nail next to the nail bed or twisting them clean off. Enough was enough the vet removed them last Thursday. All be it my bank balance is £260 lighter but the bitch will be better off without them in the long run. If I had a litter they would be coming off for sure..

 

Atb

do you use that vet all the time mate had his dogs dewclaws off and a few stiches on a cut £135 big difference to £260

 

i think the point is, if whoever bred that litter had taken the trouble to remove them. then there would have been no cost at all :yes:

 

got to agree but as we know some vets just rip the piss

Link to post

 

 

 

My bitch had em on and I had no end of hassle with her either splitting the nail next to the nail bed or twisting them clean off. Enough was enough the vet removed them last Thursday. All be it my bank balance is £260 lighter but the bitch will be better off without them in the long run. If I had a litter they would be coming off for sure..

 

Atbt

do you use that vet all the time mate had his dogs dewclaws off and a few stiches on a cut £135 big difference to £260

 

i think the point is, if whoever bred that litter had taken the trouble to remove them. then there would have been no cost at all :yes:

 

got to agree but as we know some vets just rip the piss

 

that is also very true :yes:

Link to post

They are a redundant digit. Fact. They serve no purpose. Do a quick web search.

 

When dogs evolved the dew claw grew high up from its predecessors. I can't remember the exact terminology but honestly have a look on the net.

 

As Paul said. Why leave on a possible issue.

 

Even if only 10% gave problems. Why take that chance?

Link to post

They are a redundant digit. Fact. They serve no purpose. Do a quick web search.

 

When dogs evolved the dew claw grew high up from its predecessors. I can't remember the exact terminology but honestly have a look on the net.

 

As Paul said. Why leave on a possible issue.

 

Even if only 10% gave problems. Why take that chance?

i believe most are left on due to the fact the people that breed them don't know how to remove them

Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...