Johnjo 0 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 (edited) it seems like if you happen to side with anybody on this thread, you become under the spot light, ok give it your best shot Its a strange one Mate ! we've all been watching over the thread unfold with some Guys obviousley knowing more about the case than others and sticking by the information they know in defence of parties involved, which is fair enough!! but there's others that have just popped in for the Bundle. if its a Bundle they want! it will go to the main General Forum for the rest of the Hunting community to take part and make their decisions and all sorts of shit will break loose.... Lets not turn it into a General Election lads. the two main guys are putting their cases forward and the gennuine guys who know the score are giving their support and Infomation, beleive me at the moment its pretty sensible compared to some of the stuff that goes off on the forum ..... The thread is serving no purpose other than giving Canning the sounding board that he wants, he is a vindictive nasty piece of work and has never answered any of the questions put to him. The problem is if he answers them truthfully then he confirms that he has massaged the information to suit his cause. He never answered about the letter, I know it exists because it was presented at Newcastle Court. I am sure it will be in the archives somewhere and I will endeavour to get a copy. That will show him for the liar he is. A Jury of people who did not know Canning saw through him, yet he tries to muddy the waters with half truths. Neil signed the form and was given bad advice by DEFRA when he phoned them up to query the situation. Again Neil states that the Gift box was ticked when the form was sent to him. Derek has kindly posted the form for all to see and as was stated earlier the tick has had a great deal more pressure applied to it than the other writings which are obviously Neils. He has not answered the question about the money, insists that Neil was a friend of his which he never was, He states that he was acquited ot Hexham Magistrates court of selling the falcon because of the advice of his legal team. What advice was that, don't cite the witnesses who could prove otherwise. Neil would be happy to move on and put the whole episode behind him, but for the last 15 years Canning has popped up like the bad penny he is. Give everyone a break and close this thread down. I know the truth which is more than can be said for Canning Edited March 26, 2008 by Johnjo Link to post
SPAR 2 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 No leave the thread open I am fed up with catching little fish. I need to catch a BIG one Link to post
jasper65 6 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 The thing is Spar the people who's doing the fishing are the two parties chucking bate at each other until the other bites. you're just another guy throwing in the groundbait! or should I say a small fish in a big pond where this debate is concerned . I'm being hammered by people in PM's not to removed the thread. there are many other mods on the forum watching over it too willing to let it run its course, I said in the past both parties also commented they're happy to leave it as it is so thats about it....... Link to post
DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS] 20 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 it seems like if you happen to side with anybody on this thread, you become under the spot light, ok give it your best shot Its a strange one Mate ! we've all been watching over the thread unfold with some Guys obviousley knowing more about the case than others and sticking by the information they know in defence of parties involved, which is fair enough!! but there's others that have just popped in for the Bundle. if its a Bundle they want! it will go to the main General Forum for the rest of the Hunting community to take part and make their decisions and all sorts of shit will break loose.... Lets not turn it into a General Election lads. the two main guys are putting their cases forward and the gennuine guys who know the score are giving their support and Infomation, beleive me at the moment its pretty sensible compared to some of the stuff that goes off on the forum ..... The thread is serving no purpose other than giving Canning the sounding board that he wants, he is a vindictive nasty piece of work and has never answered any of the questions put to him. The problem is if he answers them truthfully then he confirms that he has massaged the information to suit his cause. He never answered about the letter, I know it exists because it was presented at Newcastle Court. I am sure it will be in the archives somewhere and I will endeavour to get a copy. That will show him for the liar he is. A Jury of people who did not know Canning saw through him, yet he tries to muddy the waters with half truths. Neil signed the form and was given bad advice by DEFRA when he phoned them up to query the situation. Again Neil states that the Gift box was ticked when the form was sent to him. Derek has kindly posted the form for all to see and as was stated earlier the tick has had a great deal more pressure applied to it than the other writings which are obviously Neils. He has not answered the question about the money, insists that Neil was a friend of his which he never was, He states that he was acquited ot Hexham Magistrates court of selling the falcon because of the advice of his legal team. What advice was that, don't cite the witnesses who could prove otherwise. Neil would be happy to move on and put the whole episode behind him, but for the last 15 years Canning has popped up like the bad penny he is. Give everyone a break and close this thread down. I know the truth which is more than can be said for Canning Public debate is our lifeblood. Without the freedom of speech, we have only dictatorship. Men and woman have given their lives for our right to speak what is in your hearts. Anyone one who wants to stop public debate has GOT SOMETHING TO HIDE, THERE CAN BE KNOW OTHER REASON. PEOPLE WANT TO HEAR THE TRUTH. I WOULD AGREE HOWEVER, THAT IF THE POLICE WOULD DO THEIR JOB CORRECTLY AND INVESTIGATE MY ALLEGATIONS THERE MIGHT BE AN ARGUMENT TO ALLOW THE POLICE TO DO THEIR JOB with out public debate. THEREFORE, UNLESS THE POLICE START INVESTIGATING MY ALLEGATIONS WHICH IS THEIR DUTY UNDER THE POLICE REFORM ACT THEN LET THE PUBLIC DEBATE RUN, AND RUN AND RUN UNTIL THE POLICE FINALLY DO THEIR DUTY AND INVESTIGATE MY ALLEGATIONS. IT DOES NOT TAKE A GREAT MIND TO WORK OUT HOW IMPOSSIBLE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN FOR ME TO HAVE SOLD A CABLED TIED PEREGRINE FALCON TO A POLICE MAN AND EXPECT TO GET AWAY WITH IT, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN SUICIDE. WE STILL HAVE THE QUESTIONS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ANSWERED IN FULL; 1] NEIL HUNTER DID YOU FILL IN THE REGISTRATION DOCUMENT? 2] NEIL HUNTER DID YOU TICK THE BOX TO SAY THE BIRD WAS A GIFT? 3] NEIL HUNTER IF THE BIRD WAS TICKED IN A LEGAL DOCUMENT AS A GIFT WHY DID YOU AT A LATER DATE SAY THE BIRD WAS A SALE? JUST ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. In relation to mark’s bird. As all the people who know Mark will be familiar with the fact that he has got many hundreds birds, some of which are the finest specimen in the world. Mark has offered me birds free, which I have turned down, as I do not want any registerable bird, as he has done with other people. The point of the previously mentioned FACT is that Mark is upset at the fact that he has been deceived by Hunter and therefore he is complaining out of principle more than anything else. It is the point of principle that is in debate and it needs to be debated in the public domain. Link to post
SPAR 2 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 Anybody on here at the moment ever used baggie's in any form..i know it's of the topic but im just asking.. ..Millet Is it legal or illegal if its not in a shed or can you if you leave the door open ? 1 Amendment of s. 1, subs. (3), para. ( of Protection of Animals Act, 1912 The first section of the M1Protection of Animals Act, 1912, subsection (3), paragraph (, shall be amendedby the addition thereto of the following words:— “and a captive animal shall not be deemed to be coursed or hunted within the meaning of this subsection if it is coursed or hunted in an enclosed space from which it has no reasonable chance of escape.†Link to post
DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS] 20 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 The thing is Spar the people who's doing the fishing are the two parties chucking bate at each other until the other bites. you're just another guy throwing in the groundbait! or should I say a small fish in a big pond where this debate is concerned . I'm being hammered by people in PM's not to removed the thread. there are many other mods on the forum watching over it too willing to let it run its course, I said in the past both parties also commented they're happy to leave it as it is so thats about it....... Well put. The truth does hurt some people and so it should. It is refreshing to see a Forum with the heart to stand up for public debate, which should be the mantra of all Forums. Pubble you do have your right to have your say and therefore so does everyone else; that is debate and that is what makes our country strong. We must have the freedom to speak our minds in the interest of truth. The interest in this thread is a reflection of its importance, moreover; it shows how people want to hear what people have to say. I want the thread to Run and I believe that Hunter want the thread to run so there is no reason not to let the thread to run and let the people make their minds up who they believe. Obviously, there are people who have closed their minds and will not open their mind to the truth but there will be a lot more that will have an open mind. All that I ask is that you read the fact carefully on both sides before you make your minds up. Link to post
Johnjo 0 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 (edited) it seems like if you happen to side with anybody on this thread, you become under the spot light, ok give it your best shot Its a strange one Mate ! we've all been watching over the thread unfold with some Guys obviousley knowing more about the case than others and sticking by the information they know in defence of parties involved, which is fair enough!! but there's others that have just popped in for the Bundle. if its a Bundle they want! it will go to the main General Forum for the rest of the Hunting community to take part and make their decisions and all sorts of shit will break loose.... Lets not turn it into a General Election lads. the two main guys are putting their cases forward and the gennuine guys who know the score are giving their support and Infomation, beleive me at the moment its pretty sensible compared to some of the stuff that goes off on the forum ..... The thread is serving no purpose other than giving Canning the sounding board that he wants, he is a vindictive nasty piece of work and has never answered any of the questions put to him. The problem is if he answers them truthfully then he confirms that he has massaged the information to suit his cause. He never answered about the letter, I know it exists because it was presented at Newcastle Court. I am sure it will be in the archives somewhere and I will endeavour to get a copy. That will show him for the liar he is. A Jury of people who did not know Canning saw through him, yet he tries to muddy the waters with half truths. Neil signed the form and was given bad advice by DEFRA when he phoned them up to query the situation. Again Neil states that the Gift box was ticked when the form was sent to him. Derek has kindly posted the form for all to see and as was stated earlier the tick has had a great deal more pressure applied to it than the other writings which are obviously Neils. He has not answered the question about the money, insists that Neil was a friend of his which he never was, He states that he was acquited ot Hexham Magistrates court of selling the falcon because of the advice of his legal team. What advice was that, don't cite the witnesses who could prove otherwise. Neil would be happy to move on and put the whole episode behind him, but for the last 15 years Canning has popped up like the bad penny he is. Give everyone a break and close this thread down. I know the truth which is more than can be said for Canning Public debate is our lifeblood. Without the freedom of speech, we have only dictatorship. Men and woman have given their lives for our right to speak what is in your hearts. Anyone one who wants to stop public debate has GOT SOMETHING TO HIDE, THERE CAN BE KNOW OTHER REASON. PEOPLE WANT TO HEAR THE TRUTH. I WOULD AGREE HOWEVER, THAT IF THE POLICE WOULD DO THEIR JOB CORRECTLY AND INVESTIGATE MY ALLEGATIONS THERE MIGHT BE AN ARGUMENT TO ALLOW THE POLICE TO DO THEIR JOB with out public debate. THEREFORE, UNLESS THE POLICE START INVESTIGATING MY ALLEGATIONS WHICH IS THEIR DUTY UNDER THE POLICE REFORM ACT THEN LET THE PUBLIC DEBATE RUN, AND RUN AND RUN UNTIL THE POLICE FINALLY DO THEIR DUTY AND INVESTIGATE MY ALLEGATIONS. IT DOES NOT TAKE A GREAT MIND TO WORK OUT HOW IMPOSSIBLE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN FOR ME TO HAVE SOLD A CABLED TIED PEREGRINE FALCON TO A POLICE MAN AND EXPECT TO GET AWAY WITH IT, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN SUICIDE. WE STILL HAVE THE QUESTIONS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ANSWERED IN FULL; 1] NEIL HUNTER DID YOU FILL IN THE REGISTRATION DOCUMENT? 2] NEIL HUNTER DID YOU TICK THE BOX TO SAY THE BIRD WAS A GIFT? 3] NEIL HUNTER IF THE BIRD WAS TICKED IN A LEGAL DOCUMENT AS A GIFT WHY DID YOU AT A LATER DATE SAY THE BIRD WAS A SALE? JUST ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. In relation to mark’s bird. As all the people who know Mark will be familiar with the fact that he has got many hundreds birds, some of which are the finest specimen in the world. Mark has offered me birds free, which I have turned down, as I do not want any registerable bird, as he has done with other people. The point of the previously mentioned FACT is that Mark is upset at the fact that he has been deceived by Hunter and therefore he is complaining out of principle more than anything else. It is the point of principle that is in debate and it needs to be debated in the public domain. I do not see why Mark Robb should speak of principles when he has gone back on his word in the first instance, another case of selective memory loss bit like yourself Derek Neil has already said that he received the document from you along with a green pen, the gift box was ticked by you, This was the subject of a claim by you at Newcastle Court where you produced the letter. If I remember correctly after hearing all the evidence and viewing the letter the presiding judge concluded that you were a liar, not for the first time I may add in Judicial proceedings Neil has already said that he contacted Defra and was told to return the document because they knew of you anyway bad advice and I have said probably why he was not prosected for signing the declaration that you had filled in. Now answer my question Did you produce a letter at Newcsastle Court allegedly from Neil, stating that Neil had written it and thanking you for the gift of the Peregrine Will you please answer the question yes or No If it means me digging into the archives at Newcastle Court I will certainly do that to prove that you are the liar I say you are I also asked you that you should produce that on the forum which you chose to ignore I asked you to save me some time by lettting me know if it was still held on record If people look at the form which you have kindly produced, they will see that the gift box has been ticked but the pressure applied is different from Neils handwriting I suggest you quit before you make yourself look even more foolish, Edited March 26, 2008 by Johnjo Link to post
Neil Hunter 0 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 Derek Canning states somewhere in this thread that the charges relevant to the peregrine purchased by me ,from him,were dropped at Hexham Magistrates Court. Bearing in mind I was never called to give evidence during his trial, how could I have committed perjury and how did I send him to jail if the charges were dropped. This is the kind of tripe I have come up against for the last 15 years. It may be that the thread gets kept open,but it is getting a bit tiresome. No matter what is said, Mr Canning will not tell the truth and keeps going in circles. I have fully explained the Mark Robb situation , but again that goes on. Neil Link to post
Johnjo 0 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 it seems like if you happen to side with anybody on this thread, you become under the spot light, ok give it your best shot Its a strange one Mate ! we've all been watching over the thread unfold with some Guys obviousley knowing more about the case than others and sticking by the information they know in defence of parties involved, which is fair enough!! but there's others that have just popped in for the Bundle. if its a Bundle they want! it will go to the main General Forum for the rest of the Hunting community to take part and make their decisions and all sorts of shit will break loose.... Lets not turn it into a General Election lads. the two main guys are putting their cases forward and the gennuine guys who know the score are giving their support and Infomation, beleive me at the moment its pretty sensible compared to some of the stuff that goes off on the forum ..... The thread is serving no purpose other than giving Canning the sounding board that he wants, he is a vindictive nasty piece of work and has never answered any of the questions put to him. The problem is if he answers them truthfully then he confirms that he has massaged the information to suit his cause. He never answered about the letter, I know it exists because it was presented at Newcastle Court. I am sure it will be in the archives somewhere and I will endeavour to get a copy. That will show him for the liar he is. A Jury of people who did not know Canning saw through him, yet he tries to muddy the waters with half truths. Neil signed the form and was given bad advice by DEFRA when he phoned them up to query the situation. Again Neil states that the Gift box was ticked when the form was sent to him. Derek has kindly posted the form for all to see and as was stated earlier the tick has had a great deal more pressure applied to it than the other writings which are obviously Neils. He has not answered the question about the money, insists that Neil was a friend of his which he never was, He states that he was acquited ot Hexham Magistrates court of selling the falcon because of the advice of his legal team. What advice was that, don't cite the witnesses who could prove otherwise. Neil would be happy to move on and put the whole episode behind him, but for the last 15 years Canning has popped up like the bad penny he is. Give everyone a break and close this thread down. I know the truth which is more than can be said for Canning Public debate is our lifeblood. Without the freedom of speech, we have only dictatorship. Men and woman have given their lives for our right to speak what is in your hearts. Anyone one who wants to stop public debate has GOT SOMETHING TO HIDE, THERE CAN BE KNOW OTHER REASON. PEOPLE WANT TO HEAR THE TRUTH. I WOULD AGREE HOWEVER, THAT IF THE POLICE WOULD DO THEIR JOB CORRECTLY AND INVESTIGATE MY ALLEGATIONS THERE MIGHT BE AN ARGUMENT TO ALLOW THE POLICE TO DO THEIR JOB with out public debate. THEREFORE, UNLESS THE POLICE START INVESTIGATING MY ALLEGATIONS WHICH IS THEIR DUTY UNDER THE POLICE REFORM ACT THEN LET THE PUBLIC DEBATE RUN, AND RUN AND RUN UNTIL THE POLICE FINALLY DO THEIR DUTY AND INVESTIGATE MY ALLEGATIONS. IT DOES NOT TAKE A GREAT MIND TO WORK OUT HOW IMPOSSIBLE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN FOR ME TO HAVE SOLD A CABLED TIED PEREGRINE FALCON TO A POLICE MAN AND EXPECT TO GET AWAY WITH IT, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN SUICIDE. WE STILL HAVE THE QUESTIONS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ANSWERED IN FULL; 1] NEIL HUNTER DID YOU FILL IN THE REGISTRATION DOCUMENT? 2] NEIL HUNTER DID YOU TICK THE BOX TO SAY THE BIRD WAS A GIFT? 3] NEIL HUNTER IF THE BIRD WAS TICKED IN A LEGAL DOCUMENT AS A GIFT WHY DID YOU AT A LATER DATE SAY THE BIRD WAS A SALE? JUST ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. In relation to mark’s bird. As all the people who know Mark will be familiar with the fact that he has got many hundreds birds, some of which are the finest specimen in the world. Mark has offered me birds free, which I have turned down, as I do not want any registerable bird, as he has done with other people. The point of the previously mentioned FACT is that Mark is upset at the fact that he has been deceived by Hunter and therefore he is complaining out of principle more than anything else. It is the point of principle that is in debate and it needs to be debated in the public domain. I do not see why Mark Robb should speak of principles when he has gone back on his word in the first instance, another case of selective memory loss bit like yourself Derek Neil has already said that he received the document from you along with a green pen, the gift box was ticked by you, This was the subject of a claim by you at Newcastle Court where you produced the letter. If I remember correctly after hearing all the evidence and viewing the letter the presiding judge concluded that you were a liar, not for the first time I may add in Judicial proceedings Neil has already said that he contacted Defra and was told to return the document because they knew of you anyway bad advice and I have said probably why he was not prosected for signing the declaration that you had filled in. Now answer my question Did you produce a letter at Newcsastle Court allegedly from Neil, stating that Neil had written it and thanking you for the gift of the Peregrine Will you please answer the question yes or No If it means me digging into the archives at Newcastle Court I will certainly do that to prove that you are the liar I say you are I also asked you that you should produce that on the forum which you chose to ignore I asked you to save me some time by lettting me know if it was still held on record If people look at the form which you have kindly produced, they will see that the gift box has been ticked but the pressure applied is different from Neils handwriting I suggest you quit before you make yourself look even more foolish, ANSWER THE QUESTIONS DEREK AND SAVE US A LOT OF TIME Link to post
Neil Hunter 0 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 it seems like if you happen to side with anybody on this thread, you become under the spot light, ok give it your best shot Its a strange one Mate ! we've all been watching over the thread unfold with some Guys obviousley knowing more about the case than others and sticking by the information they know in defence of parties involved, which is fair enough!! but there's others that have just popped in for the Bundle. if its a Bundle they want! it will go to the main General Forum for the rest of the Hunting community to take part and make their decisions and all sorts of shit will break loose.... Lets not turn it into a General Election lads. the two main guys are putting their cases forward and the gennuine guys who know the score are giving their support and Infomation, beleive me at the moment its pretty sensible compared to some of the stuff that goes off on the forum ..... The thread is serving no purpose other than giving Canning the sounding board that he wants, he is a vindictive nasty piece of work and has never answered any of the questions put to him. The problem is if he answers them truthfully then he confirms that he has massaged the information to suit his cause. He never answered about the letter, I know it exists because it was presented at Newcastle Court. I am sure it will be in the archives somewhere and I will endeavour to get a copy. That will show him for the liar he is. A Jury of people who did not know Canning saw through him, yet he tries to muddy the waters with half truths. Neil signed the form and was given bad advice by DEFRA when he phoned them up to query the situation. Again Neil states that the Gift box was ticked when the form was sent to him. Derek has kindly posted the form for all to see and as was stated earlier the tick has had a great deal more pressure applied to it than the other writings which are obviously Neils. He has not answered the question about the money, insists that Neil was a friend of his which he never was, He states that he was acquited ot Hexham Magistrates court of selling the falcon because of the advice of his legal team. What advice was that, don't cite the witnesses who could prove otherwise. Neil would be happy to move on and put the whole episode behind him, but for the last 15 years Canning has popped up like the bad penny he is. Give everyone a break and close this thread down. I know the truth which is more than can be said for Canning Public debate is our lifeblood. Without the freedom of speech, we have only dictatorship. Men and woman have given their lives for our right to speak what is in your hearts. Anyone one who wants to stop public debate has GOT SOMETHING TO HIDE, THERE CAN BE KNOW OTHER REASON. PEOPLE WANT TO HEAR THE TRUTH. I WOULD AGREE HOWEVER, THAT IF THE POLICE WOULD DO THEIR JOB CORRECTLY AND INVESTIGATE MY ALLEGATIONS THERE MIGHT BE AN ARGUMENT TO ALLOW THE POLICE TO DO THEIR JOB with out public debate. THEREFORE, UNLESS THE POLICE START INVESTIGATING MY ALLEGATIONS WHICH IS THEIR DUTY UNDER THE POLICE REFORM ACT THEN LET THE PUBLIC DEBATE RUN, AND RUN AND RUN UNTIL THE POLICE FINALLY DO THEIR DUTY AND INVESTIGATE MY ALLEGATIONS. IT DOES NOT TAKE A GREAT MIND TO WORK OUT HOW IMPOSSIBLE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN FOR ME TO HAVE SOLD A CABLED TIED PEREGRINE FALCON TO A POLICE MAN AND EXPECT TO GET AWAY WITH IT, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN SUICIDE. WE STILL HAVE THE QUESTIONS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ANSWERED IN FULL; 1] NEIL HUNTER DID YOU FILL IN THE REGISTRATION DOCUMENT? 2] NEIL HUNTER DID YOU TICK THE BOX TO SAY THE BIRD WAS A GIFT? 3] NEIL HUNTER IF THE BIRD WAS TICKED IN A LEGAL DOCUMENT AS A GIFT WHY DID YOU AT A LATER DATE SAY THE BIRD WAS A SALE? JUST ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. In relation to mark’s bird. As all the people who know Mark will be familiar with the fact that he has got many hundreds birds, some of which are the finest specimen in the world. Mark has offered me birds free, which I have turned down, as I do not want any registerable bird, as he has done with other people. The point of the previously mentioned FACT is that Mark is upset at the fact that he has been deceived by Hunter and therefore he is complaining out of principle more than anything else. It is the point of principle that is in debate and it needs to be debated in the public domain. 1. I completed the registration document. 2. I did not tick the gift box.It had already been ticked in green biro pen. You asked me to say it was a gift.I refused. 3. DOE told me they were aware of you (you had just been raided by the RSPB,The Police ,DOE and Roger Cook and were featured on the Cook Report), and advised me to sign the document and return it. These are the facts. Neil. Link to post
Johnjo 0 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 it seems like if you happen to side with anybody on this thread, you become under the spot light, ok give it your best shot Its a strange one Mate ! we've all been watching over the thread unfold with some Guys obviousley knowing more about the case than others and sticking by the information they know in defence of parties involved, which is fair enough!! but there's others that have just popped in for the Bundle. if its a Bundle they want! it will go to the main General Forum for the rest of the Hunting community to take part and make their decisions and all sorts of shit will break loose.... Lets not turn it into a General Election lads. the two main guys are putting their cases forward and the gennuine guys who know the score are giving their support and Infomation, beleive me at the moment its pretty sensible compared to some of the stuff that goes off on the forum ..... The thread is serving no purpose other than giving Canning the sounding board that he wants, he is a vindictive nasty piece of work and has never answered any of the questions put to him. The problem is if he answers them truthfully then he confirms that he has massaged the information to suit his cause. He never answered about the letter, I know it exists because it was presented at Newcastle Court. I am sure it will be in the archives somewhere and I will endeavour to get a copy. That will show him for the liar he is. A Jury of people who did not know Canning saw through him, yet he tries to muddy the waters with half truths. Neil signed the form and was given bad advice by DEFRA when he phoned them up to query the situation. Again Neil states that the Gift box was ticked when the form was sent to him. Derek has kindly posted the form for all to see and as was stated earlier the tick has had a great deal more pressure applied to it than the other writings which are obviously Neils. He has not answered the question about the money, insists that Neil was a friend of his which he never was, He states that he was acquited ot Hexham Magistrates court of selling the falcon because of the advice of his legal team. What advice was that, don't cite the witnesses who could prove otherwise. Neil would be happy to move on and put the whole episode behind him, but for the last 15 years Canning has popped up like the bad penny he is. Give everyone a break and close this thread down. I know the truth which is more than can be said for Canning Public debate is our lifeblood. Without the freedom of speech, we have only dictatorship. Men and woman have given their lives for our right to speak what is in your hearts. Anyone one who wants to stop public debate has GOT SOMETHING TO HIDE, THERE CAN BE KNOW OTHER REASON. PEOPLE WANT TO HEAR THE TRUTH. I WOULD AGREE HOWEVER, THAT IF THE POLICE WOULD DO THEIR JOB CORRECTLY AND INVESTIGATE MY ALLEGATIONS THERE MIGHT BE AN ARGUMENT TO ALLOW THE POLICE TO DO THEIR JOB with out public debate. THEREFORE, UNLESS THE POLICE START INVESTIGATING MY ALLEGATIONS WHICH IS THEIR DUTY UNDER THE POLICE REFORM ACT THEN LET THE PUBLIC DEBATE RUN, AND RUN AND RUN UNTIL THE POLICE FINALLY DO THEIR DUTY AND INVESTIGATE MY ALLEGATIONS. IT DOES NOT TAKE A GREAT MIND TO WORK OUT HOW IMPOSSIBLE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN FOR ME TO HAVE SOLD A CABLED TIED PEREGRINE FALCON TO A POLICE MAN AND EXPECT TO GET AWAY WITH IT, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN SUICIDE. WE STILL HAVE THE QUESTIONS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ANSWERED IN FULL; 1] NEIL HUNTER DID YOU FILL IN THE REGISTRATION DOCUMENT? 2] NEIL HUNTER DID YOU TICK THE BOX TO SAY THE BIRD WAS A GIFT? 3] NEIL HUNTER IF THE BIRD WAS TICKED IN A LEGAL DOCUMENT AS A GIFT WHY DID YOU AT A LATER DATE SAY THE BIRD WAS A SALE? JUST ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. In relation to mark’s bird. As all the people who know Mark will be familiar with the fact that he has got many hundreds birds, some of which are the finest specimen in the world. Mark has offered me birds free, which I have turned down, as I do not want any registerable bird, as he has done with other people. The point of the previously mentioned FACT is that Mark is upset at the fact that he has been deceived by Hunter and therefore he is complaining out of principle more than anything else. It is the point of principle that is in debate and it needs to be debated in the public domain. 1. I completed the registration document. 2. I did not tick the gift box.It had already been ticked in green biro pen. You asked me to say it was a gift.I refused. 3. DOE told me they were aware of you (you had just been raided by the RSPB,The Police ,DOE and Roger Cook and were featured on the Cook Report), and advised me to sign the document and return it. These are the facts. Neil. Over to you Derek, did you produce a letter at Newcastle Court stating you had received it from Neil Yes or No Link to post
D.A.Z 0 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 nothing to do with me,i got enough problems of my own Link to post
DEREK CANNING LLB[HONS] 20 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 nothing to do with me,i got enough problems of my own I have emailed about 120 members of the house of Parliament to ask for a police inquiry into the matter, as there is a serious issue of perverting the course of justice and Hunter saying there might be some minor inconsistencies dos not work. To be a good liar you need a good memory. This is a copy of the letter that I got back from the handwriting expert however it is not the one that I need, which I am still looking for. Link to post
Scooby Falcons 0 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 First of all, to the people on here, I am not Mark Robb, despite the fact you may think I am. Secondly, I am not in any way fully aware of the facts between Derek Canning and Hunter, although I do know alot of the background. Thirdly, what I do know is the facts between Mark Robb and Hunter of the dispute over the taken Falcons from Marks place. I know who I believe, there are other matters raised which havn't been posted on here. I'm sure it will all come out sooner rather than later. Link to post
jasper65 6 Posted March 26, 2008 Report Share Posted March 26, 2008 nothing to do with me,i got enough problems of my own I know what you're saying mate! I'm living here in a whole world of shit at the moment, thankfully when I get down the aviaries I get some peace and pretend I'm a sex god infront of my females .... Jasper Link to post
Recommended Posts