Lab 10,979 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 I would guess most shoots about break even and nothing moreI'd say similar.......most that i know off probably do it to get there shooting for free, invite guests and then in turn get invited to there shoots. Shooting all year for nothing....canny be bad.. So basically they run these shoots so they can shoot for free? All the while us that enjoy watching real natural predators like BOP' have to miss out cos they interfere with these fat lazy bastarding shooters enjoyment of shooting an over fed, fat pet bird? I'm sorry but its not a fair price to pay. Theres no chance i'm going to bother even debating this with you.......atleast Stewie can blame the drink....your just an arsehole... 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RubyTex 1,957 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 Don't beat around the bush will you Lab!! Lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
unlacedgecko 1,466 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 I agree with Lurcher1 and Baw. There should never be any lethal control of these re-introduced apex predators under any circumstances, certainly not to protect profits which are made off non-native species. In fact, the introduction of apex predators should continue throughout the UK. I can see it now, wolf packs being introduced to England. They could control the numbers of deer, and would be really nice for people to see. It does not matter if they kill and fallow, sika, muntjac or chinese water deer, as these are all non-native species introduced for sporting purposes. Sheep and cattle are not native to the UK, they are raised for farmers to make a profit on, what does it matter if re-introduced bear and lynx kill some? After all, the farmers were only going to kill them anyway. There should be no human interference in wild animal populations. Nature will find a balance. As shown in the graph of wolf and moose populations from Royale Island, wild populations stay nice and stable and everybody is happy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,819 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 Oh my god! Where to begin.................. nah I'll just not bother! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
baw 4,360 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 I would guess most shoots about break even and nothing moreI'd say similar.......most that i know off probably do it to get there shooting for free, invite guests and then in turn get invited to there shoots. Shooting all year for nothing....canny be bad.. So basically they run these shoots so they can shoot for free? All the while us that enjoy watching real natural predators like BOP' have to miss out cos they interfere with these fat lazy bastarding shooters enjoyment of shooting an over fed, fat pet bird? I'm sorry but its not a fair price to pay. Theres no chance i'm going to bother even debating this with you.......atleast Stewie can blame the drink....your just an arsehole... got to agree with you there Quote Link to post Share on other sites
baw 4,360 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 I agree with Lurcher1 and Baw. There should never be any lethal control of these re-introduced apex predators under any circumstances, certainly not to protect profits which are made off non-native species. In fact, the introduction of apex predators should continue throughout the UK. I can see it now, wolf packs being introduced to England. They could control the numbers of deer, and would be really nice for people to see. It does not matter if they kill and fallow, sika, muntjac or chinese water deer, as these are all non-native species introduced for sporting purposes. Sheep and cattle are not native to the UK, they are raised for farmers to make a profit on, what does it matter if re-introduced bear and lynx kill some? After all, the farmers were only going to kill them anyway. There should be no human interference in wild animal populations. Nature will find a balance. As shown in the graph of wolf and moose populations from Royale Island, wild populations stay nice and stable and everybody is happy. images.jpg Thanks for agreeing with me mate but got to distance myself from the rest of your post we have enough problems in this country with semi tamed foxes biting babies etc cos of folk feeding them. Imagine what it would be like with semi tame wolves!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,819 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 I agree with Lurcher1 and Baw. There should never be any lethal control of these re-introduced apex predators under any circumstances, certainly not to protect profits which are made off non-native species. In fact, the introduction of apex predators should continue throughout the UK. I can see it now, wolf packs being introduced to England. They could control the numbers of deer, and would be really nice for people to see. It does not matter if they kill and fallow, sika, muntjac or chinese water deer, as these are all non-native species introduced for sporting purposes. Sheep and cattle are not native to the UK, they are raised for farmers to make a profit on, what does it matter if re-introduced bear and lynx kill some? After all, the farmers were only going to kill them anyway. There should be no human interference in wild animal populations. Nature will find a balance. As shown in the graph of wolf and moose populations from Royale Island, wild populations stay nice and stable and everybody is happy. images.jpg Thanks for agreeing with me mate but got to distance myself from the rest of your post we have enough problems in this country with semi tamed foxes biting babies etc cos of folk feeding them. Imagine what it would be like with semi tame wolves!!!! And then imposing a rule that they are not to be controlled by lethal means no matter the reason! The f***ing mind boggles! Infact, it's just plain animal rights radicalism! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RubyTex 1,957 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 I agree with Lurcher1 and Baw. There should never be any lethal control of these re-introduced apex predators under any circumstances, certainly not to protect profits which are made off non-native species. In fact, the introduction of apex predators should continue throughout the UK. I can see it now, wolf packs being introduced to England. They could control the numbers of deer, and would be really nice for people to see. It does not matter if they kill and fallow, sika, muntjac or chinese water deer, as these are all non-native species introduced for sporting purposes. Sheep and cattle are not native to the UK, they are raised for farmers to make a profit on, what does it matter if re-introduced bear and lynx kill some? After all, the farmers were only going to kill them anyway. There should be no human interference in wild animal populations. Nature will find a balance. As shown in the graph of wolf and moose populations from Royale Island, wild populations stay nice and stable and everybody is happy. images.jpg Thanks for agreeing with me mate but got to distance myself from the rest of your post we have enough problems in this country with semi tamed foxes biting babies etc cos of folk feeding them. Imagine what it would be like with semi tame wolves!!!! And you just know some daft arse would try and be like that 'wolf man' off the tele and have his face ripped off Quote Link to post Share on other sites
STRANGER 948 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 I agree with Lurcher1 and Baw. There should never be any lethal control of these re-introduced apex predators under any circumstances, certainly not to protect profits which are made off non-native species. In fact, the introduction of apex predators should continue throughout the UK. I can see it now, wolf packs being introduced to England. They could control the numbers of deer, and would be really nice for people to see. It does not matter if they kill and fallow, sika, muntjac or chinese water deer, as these are all non-native species introduced for sporting purposes. Sheep and cattle are not native to the UK, they are raised for farmers to make a profit on, what does it matter if re-introduced bear and lynx kill some? After all, the farmers were only going to kill them anyway. There should be no human interference in wild animal populations. Nature will find a balance. As shown in the graph of wolf and moose populations from Royale Island, wild populations stay nice and stable and everybody is happy. images.jpg Why don't we all go and live in caves and throw our shit at each other? Dumb c**t. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stewie 3,387 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 Some keeper you!!! Your supposed to come on and explain to Stewie that he is talking pish........again!!.....Infact wait till he reads this back sober, i'm sure he'll be a tad embarrassed.......... he wont as he was sober as a judge all along......like i said in my first post on this thread.....its a shame it got cut down for whatever reason......as for all the other debates lol its not my fault you forgot sea eagles mainly eat FISH ya fanny lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
baw 4,360 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 I agree with Lurcher1 and Baw. There should never be any lethal control of these re-introduced apex predators under any circumstances, certainly not to protect profits which are made off non-native species. In fact, the introduction of apex predators should continue throughout the UK. I can see it now, wolf packs being introduced to England. They could control the numbers of deer, and would be really nice for people to see. It does not matter if they kill and fallow, sika, muntjac or chinese water deer, as these are all non-native species introduced for sporting purposes. Sheep and cattle are not native to the UK, they are raised for farmers to make a profit on, what does it matter if re-introduced bear and lynx kill some? After all, the farmers were only going to kill them anyway. There should be no human interference in wild animal populations. Nature will find a balance. As shown in the graph of wolf and moose populations from Royale Island, wild populations stay nice and stable and everybody is happy. images.jpg Thanks for agreeing with me mate but got to distance myself from the rest of your post we have enough problems in this country with semi tamed foxes biting babies etc cos of folk feeding them. Imagine what it would be like with semi tame wolves!!!! And you just know some daft arse would try and be like that 'wolf man' off the tele and have his face ripped off That guys a f***ing nutter. Can mind seeing him introducing his new wife to the pack, I thought f**k me, this could go bad. Wish he'd married the ex tbh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
STRANGER 948 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 Some keeper you!!! Your supposed to come on and explain to Stewie that he is talking pish........again!!.....Infact wait till he reads this back sober, i'm sure he'll be a tad embarrassed.......... he wont as he was sober as a judge all along......like i said in my first post on this thread.....its a shame it got cut down for whatever reason......as for all the other debates lol its not my fault you forgot sea eagles mainly eat FISH ya fanny lol Aye fish and people http://www.thecourier.co.uk/news/local/perth-kinross/perthshire-minister-suffers-cuts-in-bizarre-sea-eagle-attack-1.46508 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bigdaz 688 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 I agree with Lurcher1 and Baw. There should never be any lethal control of these re-introduced apex predators under any circumstances, certainly not to protect profits which are made off non-native species. In fact, the introduction of apex predators should continue throughout the UK. I can see it now, wolf packs being introduced to England. They could control the numbers of deer, and would be really nice for people to see. It does not matter if they kill and fallow, sika, muntjac or chinese water deer, as these are all non-native species introduced for sporting purposes. Sheep and cattle are not native to the UK, they are raised for farmers to make a profit on, what does it matter if re-introduced bear and lynx kill some? After all, the farmers were only going to kill them anyway. There should be no human interference in wild animal populations. Nature will find a balance. As shown in the graph of wolf and moose populations from Royale Island, wild populations stay nice and stable and everybody is happy. images.jpg I agree with Lurcher1 and Baw. There should never be any lethal control of these re-introduced apex predators under any circumstances, certainly not to protect profits which are made off non-native species. In fact, the introduction of apex predators should continue throughout the UK. I can see it now, wolf packs being introduced to England. They could control the numbers of deer, and would be really nice for people to see. It does not matter if they kill and fallow, sika, muntjac or chinese water deer, as these are all non-native species introduced for sporting purposes. Sheep and cattle are not native to the UK, they are raised for farmers to make a profit on, what does it matter if re-introduced bear and lynx kill some? After all, the farmers were only going to kill them anyway. There should be no human interference in wild animal populations. Nature will find a balance. As shown in the graph of wolf and moose populations from Royale Island, wild populations stay nice and stable and everybody is happy. images.jpg Dear sweet Lord, you truly believe that,?. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
baw 4,360 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 Some keeper you!!! Your supposed to come on and explain to Stewie that he is talking pish........again!!.....Infact wait till he reads this back sober, i'm sure he'll be a tad embarrassed.......... he wont as he was sober as a judge all along......like i said in my first post on this thread.....its a shame it got cut down for whatever reason......as for all the other debates lol its not my fault you forgot sea eagles mainly eat FISH ya fanny lol Can mind seeing them on the west coast of Scotland when I was fishing as a boy, must have been about 8. 2 adults and a juvenile in a sea loch, quality. But you guys a right, if they kill 100 pheasants each they deserve to die, better off without them. The fact I can mind it as plain as day 30 errr 20 odd years later speaks volumes of the impact it had on me. I can't even mind the last pheasant I ran over..... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RubyTex 1,957 Posted June 14, 2013 Report Share Posted June 14, 2013 I agree with Lurcher1 and Baw. There should never be any lethal control of these re-introduced apex predators under any circumstances, certainly not to protect profits which are made off non-native species. In fact, the introduction of apex predators should continue throughout the UK. I can see it now, wolf packs being introduced to England. They could control the numbers of deer, and would be really nice for people to see. It does not matter if they kill and fallow, sika, muntjac or chinese water deer, as these are all non-native species introduced for sporting purposes. Sheep and cattle are not native to the UK, they are raised for farmers to make a profit on, what does it matter if re-introduced bear and lynx kill some? After all, the farmers were only going to kill them anyway. There should be no human interference in wild animal populations. Nature will find a balance. As shown in the graph of wolf and moose populations from Royale Island, wild populations stay nice and stable and everybody is happy. images.jpg Why don't we all go and live in caves and throw our shit at each other? Lab's favourite past time that Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.