Badger Cull 2013

[Qbgrey 4,143]

hopefully may will turn up tonight trying to stop the cull,he does look like a badger with them greyish,black bristley hair,................we can only hope

[whippet 99 2,613]

hopefully may will turn up tonight trying to stop the cull,he does look like a badger with them greyish,black bristley hair,................we can only hope

lets hope the fanny is on all fours looking through a hedge ,.........with the cross hairs in the middle of his forehead..........dirty old fooker

[paulus 26]

LOL yeh...doesn't matter what animal it is...if it has BTB it will spread it....

 

If you reduce the numbers then they spread it less....

 

I seriously struggle to understand how people can't get this.

 

Also if you want to vaccinate then you still need to cull, then vaccinate them when the numbers are much lower.

How the fook would you even know you had vacinated the whole poputaion in a given area

[BORDERSCOT 3,816]

 

LOL yeh...doesn't matter what animal it is...if it has BTB it will spread it....

 

If you reduce the numbers then they spread it less....

 

I seriously struggle to understand how people can't get this.

 

Also if you want to vaccinate then you still need to cull, then vaccinate them when the numbers are much lower.

How the fook would you even know you had vacinated the whole poputaion in a given area

 

 

Issue them with wee vaccination certificates...

[Nik_B 3,790]

I do agree with that Paulus but if they want to vaccinate they still need to cull but those mongs don't get it...there's millions of badgers and it would be impossible to vaccinate all of them if their numbers are 3 million or 100,000. If there was just 100k of them then you would at least be able to vaccinate a high percentage.

 

fact is the cull must go ahead and the antis don't want it because there will be 100% proof in 1 years time that the cull is effective.

[paulus 26]

 

 

LOL yeh...doesn't matter what animal it is...if it has BTB it will spread it....

 

If you reduce the numbers then they spread it less....

 

I seriously struggle to understand how people can't get this.

 

Also if you want to vaccinate then you still need to cull, then vaccinate them when the numbers are much lower.

How the fook would you even know you had vacinated the whole poputaion in a given area

 

 

Issue them with wee vaccination certificates...

 

European passports

[Qbgrey 4,143]

these townie fuckers really wind me up,theve no clue what goes on in the field,im out regular like many on here and its plain to see .its called conservation of all our wildlife,it aint a nice job but we do it to keep a balance and still see hares,hedgehogs,partridge,etc.to many of one thing is not good.....................just look at them muslims

[Nik_B 3,790]

 

 

LOL yeh...doesn't matter what animal it is...if it has BTB it will spread it....

 

If you reduce the numbers then they spread it less....

 

I seriously struggle to understand how people can't get this.

 

Also if you want to vaccinate then you still need to cull, then vaccinate them when the numbers are much lower.

How the fook would you even know you had vacinated the whole poputaion in a given area

 

 

Issue them with wee vaccination certificates...

 

 

To go in their little badger suitcases

[whippet 99 2,613]

I cant understand some people .......................for once in the name of god they have chose the right decision as it will be most effective(aswell as cost effective lol) ,.............its had more thought put into it than blairs bank balance,........let them do what needs to be done........there is know way that vaccination is a possibility and they know it ,..............it wont happen .............fact

[paulus 26]

I do agree with that Paulus but if they want to vaccinate they still need to cull but those mongs don't get it...there's millions of badgers and it would be impossible to vaccinate all of them if their numbers are 3 million or 100,000. If there was just 100k of them then you would at least be able to vaccinate a high percentage.

 

fact is the cull must go ahead and the antis don't want it because there will be 100% proof in 1 years time that the cull is effective.

to vaccinate effectivley you need to vaccinate the whole population in an area every year for a good few years in order for the resident population to gain immunity, until such time that an effective vaccine that is administered to the cattle is available then there is no option but to cull, doing nothing and awaiting that vaccine, should it ever become available is not an option

[Qbgrey 4,143]

hopefull the govt will do similar scheme like your tax rebate ,where you get paid a year later,only on this badger culling.............i be a effing millionare

[stewie 3,387]

the only positive thing to come out of this is that "normal" people will see that with proper control of any species that breed in numbers, then an acceptable number can be left in peace and only culled as an when necessary and this whole situation would never of arisen in the first place!!!!!

[whippet 99 2,613]

the only positive thing to come out of this is that "normal" people will see that with proper control of any species that breed in numbers, then an acceptable number can be left in peace and only culled as an when necessary and this whole situation would never of arisen in the first place!!!!!

well that's the trouble ,........when the law is the answer ,......they know fully well what its done for old billy and they fooked up but will pay double for a few stupid words which is counted as a law............because there spineless ,.hipicritcal rat monkeys.....

[earth-thrower 493]

 

I don't get how a badger cull will erradicate bTB when there are a whole other multitude of creatures that harbour and spread it. Deer, wild boar, cats, dogs, rats and alpacas are just a few, so why aren't measures being put in place to cull these alongside an improvement of animal husbandry?

 

The previous cull provided conclusive evidence that it made no difference to the numbers of bTB cases in the trialled area. I fear this is just a way of giving in the nutty NFU leadership team and hiding the fact that hundreds of millions of public money has been wasted on research, compensation and development for an innoculation but the best they can come up with is a vaccine that shows a positive result to the bTB test activator. This is just a cheaper alternative to trapping and vaccinating the badgers for which there IS a verified vaccine. Sure Brian May is a bit of a dick but I don't think a cull is the way to manage this. Maybe of the farmers stopped spreading confirmed infected slurry from their pits into their fields as fertiliser that would be a big step in the right direction. Plenty of farmers have badgers living on their land and have yet to see and outbreak case on their land.

On your bike!!!! Thinking you may be on the wrong forum there's plenty others out there for people with your views

 

Stupid comment.

[earth-thrower 493]

 

 

Matt the Rat is very clued up on the science behind this, it'd be interesting to hear his views. One thing I do know, Re bTB and badger culling the science is so clouded with politics it can hardly be considered science!

 

As for wiping out the badger, it's a cull not an erradication!

 

The "science" isn't even science BH. It is a politically driven scheme and nothing else.

 

Ah, now I though it was a trial in two areas over a five year period with a four year rest and investigation period (as they did before) but it is a nationwide scheme. They will monitor the two areas for effectivenes of badger removal, safety of the work and the humaness of the kills, after that are going nationwide with it. We are looking at a reduction in badgers upto -90% in some areas. How can that be justified as a cul. A cull is to control, this will nearly wipe them out with no scientific evidence.

 

Take yourself off to May's house ffs he'll be happy for your input. Next you'll be saying they control their own numbers

 

Again,silly........