Blackbriar 8,569 Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 Charismatic TV star, loved by generations, with his own show and unlimited access to children..........no wonder Sooty's keeping his head down ! not just sooty someone else had a hand in it ... probably finger bob i bet someone at the beeb did His lawyers are going to make a clean sweep and sue.........(sorry - couldn't resist it !) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pip1968 2,490 Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 Charismatic TV star, loved by generations, with his own show and unlimited access to children..........no wonder Sooty's keeping his head down ! not just sooty someone else had a hand in it ... probably finger bob i bet someone at the beeb did His lawyers are going to make a clean sweep and sue.........(sorry - couldn't resist it !) id be more worried about butch as that name would scare any kid Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The one 8,479 Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 No said it didn't happen but i think a few are jumping on the band wagon now compensation's been mentioned ,fecking sure it wouldn't take me forty years to report something 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Outlaw Pete 2,224 Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 If you try and think about old tv celebs from the past its hard to think of one that doesn't seem dodgy now . For instance Frankie Howerd I don't think you'd even want to know the buzz about Frankie Howard, back in the day. Never mind John Noakes and " Get down, Shep! " Seems our Frankie, with his Great Dane, was more, " Get up, Balzac! " Come to mention it; What about Bernie Winters and that f**king great St. Bernard of his ....? Isn't there an old, theatrical adage, about never performing with animals or kids? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MR TEA POT 1,287 Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 think the BBC should change countryfile to pedophille Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lanesra 3,994 Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 Now We Know Why Lots Off Them Celebs Offered There Services For "Children In Need" . . Fukcing Disgraceful Whats Obviously Been Going On And All The People Saying About Length Of Time And Money Grabbers , Stuart Hall Seemed Genuine Enough A Few Weeks Ago Saying How He Was Innocent And Would Clear His GOOD NAME & The Length Off Time It's Took To Come Out And Only The Love And Trust His Family Have Shown Him Stopped Him From Commiting Suicide . . . Then Holds His Hands Up For Offences Involving A 9yr Old . . So Lets Not Be Kidded Here This Is Some Vendetta Yes The Odd Wierdo Will Alledge Something But Those Who Investigate These Type Off Offences Are Well Drilled To Route Out The Pretenders . . And As For Sir Cliff Well I Have My Own Opinion Off Him And NOTHING WOULD SURPRISE ME ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stabba 10,745 Posted May 7, 2013 Report Share Posted May 7, 2013 Young kids must have been offered up on a plate the way Charlie is now to todays stars...The BBC as a cooperation should be put on trial for crimes against children.Seems absoloute power does corrupt. What a sad depraved society we live in. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Paid 935 Posted May 8, 2013 Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 I recon we should get lurcher1 to say John Craven touched his star fish. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cocpops 19 Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 The trouble with Brucey is he still very active in the BBC where as the others careers are all over, maybe it'll come out when he's dead and buried like Saville? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Paid 935 Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 Just on a different note, you do relise that your name reads as cock pops, not cocopops right ? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LaraCroft 863 Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 Just on a different note, you do relise that your name reads as cock pops, not cocopops right ? I read it as CocoPops - I think my eyes put the extra " o " in to not upset my brain ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cocpops 19 Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 I don't think we should be brandishing names of folk that aren't guilty or getting questioned. It takes the spot light away from the true culprits. Yes Baw there`s way to much shit on here now ! A shower of fish wives sticking knives in people that have not even being accused by anyone. Book, Cover Judge ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
walshie 2,804 Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 Fishwife yourself Cocpops. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stewie 3,387 Posted May 9, 2013 Report Share Posted May 9, 2013 I recon we should get lurcher1 to say John Craven touched his star fish. does it matter that i was willing tho???? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.