Whats The Better Allround Quality, An Mtc Or A Bushnell?

[jam1e 12]

Just want to gauge opinions please folks.

I'm looking at a couple of scopes at the moment for a project.

I've been looking at the MTC Optics Taipan 6-24x56 IR, and the Bushnell Banner 6-18 x 50mm.

Now i'm not looking at whether it's fit for my project, or my gun and the like. I'm purely after what people think is the better of the 2 for "allround" quality.

Cheers

 

 

 

[walshie 2,804]

Personally I'm a Bushnell man, but i'd go for the Trophy range or better.

[jam1e 12]

Personally I'm a Bushnell man, but i'd go for the Trophy range or better.

Cheers Walshie!

[shootlodge 146]

I find basic bushnell ok for 22/223 cals weather air or fac, after that i go Burris, Lupould, etc as these are better scopes for the price.I like a wider field of view than most bushell which i find quite narrow. As with all look around , there are almost £100 diffrence between some shop prices for similar deals, & check out high end scopes branded with other names for over seas markets. A trendy name can cost £100+ for the same item.

[M47KS_M4N_CH71S 50]

Another one for bushnell!

Atb chris

[charlie caller 3,654]

Bushnell mate out of the two,but having owned both, and now owning a Nikon prostaff 3-9x50,neither are a patch on it, its Nikon all the way for me now,as I have stated before,how they make such superb optics for the money is beyond me.

[jam1e 12]

Cheers Fellas,

I went with an MTC Viper 4-16x50ir in the end.

Not used it in anger yet, so time will tell...