1St Or Second Focal Plane?

[trenchfoot 4,243]

What are folks thoughts on the above? First focal plane seems to make more sense but most appear to be 2nd and mildot at 10x

 

All feedback appreciated

[trenchfoot 4,243]

No feedback anyone?

I'll add that I am looking at a falcon 4-14x44 scope with a 1st focal plane reticule. Anyone got any experience with this scope or make?Thinking of putting it on a prosport!

[Daz 7 563]

Best Scope i've Used is the Falcon Menace 4 - 14 x 44 FFP, Superb Glass built like a tank it's been on Prosport, HW , HW 77 K all .22 cal,

Both My Rapids MK 2 .177 cal and now it's atop My Rapid TTR 1 .25 cal.

The EMD Reticle with half Mildots is Spot on, 8 mildots so plenty of aimpoints even for the Loopy sub 12ft/lb .25 cal TTR 1. Only fault is the weight of the scope,

Has it can be also used for centre fire guns so built to take punishment, I like them so much i have the new 5.5 - 25 x 50 B20 ir reticle scope fitted to My MK 2 Rapid

So a Definite recommendation from Me.

 

atvb Daz 7.

[tonyponty 6]

how do the falcons work there supposed to stay same no matter what mag your on aren`t they cheers ..tony

[Daz 7 563]

Correct if You zero at maximum magnification then no matter what magx you Turn up or down,

Your aim points remain the same on a first focal plain scope.

 

atvb Daz 7.

[dtw 42]

I have the falcon menace 5.5 - 25 x 50 B20 reticle, as said above great scope if somewhat heavy. For me real plus points are only one set of aim points to remember, as i do use various magnifications. I also like the fine reticle and they are built like a tank, dial in very well and never had any probs with retaining zero.