Kris L. Christine 2 Posted February 12, 2013 Report Share Posted February 12, 2013 (edited) CALIFORNIA ACTION ALERT: Rabies Bill AB 272introduced by Assemblyman Gomez seeks to lower required age of vaccination to 12weeks from the current 16 weeks http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/asm/ab_0251-0300/ab_272_bill_20130207_introduced.html . What You Can Do to Help: Please contact Mr. Gomez & ask him toWITHDRAW this bill! assemblymember.gomez@assembly.ca.gov (916) 319-2051 PERMISSION GRANTED TO CROSS-POST Edited February 14, 2013 by Kris L. Christine Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kris L. Christine 2 Posted February 14, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 Below is my letter to Assemblymember Gomez on behalf of The Rabies Challenge Fund.February 13, 2013Assemblymember Jimmy GomezState CapitolP.O. Box 942849Sacramento, CA 94249-0051RE: AB 272 An Act to Amend Section 121690 of the Health and Safety Code Relating to Rabies Greetings Assemblymember Gomez:Assembly Bill AB 272 which you have introduced seeking to lower the age at which dogs must be vaccinated against rabies from 4 months to 3 months is ill-advised and scientifically unfounded. The bill seeks to address a problem in the canine community that does not exist, as the California Department of Public Health’s statistics in Reported Animal Rabies Data make abundantly clear: bats and other wildlife pose the major threat of rabies transmission to the public, not dogs under the age of 4 months. Three cases of rabies in dogs since 2007 (no mention of them being dogs under 4 months of age), as opposed to 981 rabid bats and 147 rabid skunks for the same period, evidences the fact that the current law requiring puppies to be vaccinated against rabies by 4 months of age is effective at controlling rabies in California’s canine community and does not need to be changed. Lowering the age at which puppies are required to have their first rabies shot from 4 months to 3 months would be counterproductive. Puppies are finishing up their other vaccinations (distemper, hepatitis, parvo) at 12 weeks (3 months) of age, and adding a rabies vaccine into the mix will not only increase the likelihood of adverse reactions, but also the probability that the vaccine components will interfere with each other and neutralize or negate the desired immunological response. Contributing to the chance that rabies vaccination at 3 months may not be effective is the continued presence of maternal antibodies. According to the 2006 American Animal Hospital Association's Canine Vaccine Guidelines, the most common reason for vaccination failure is "the puppy has a sufficient amount of passively acquired maternal antibody (PAMA) to block the vaccine......" [1] They elaborate by reporting that at the ages of 14 to 16 weeks of age, "PAMA should be at a level that will not block active immunization in most puppies (>95%) when a reliable product is used." After the age of 16 weeks (4 months), the maternal antibodies are reduced to a level at which they should not reduce the rabies vaccine's effectiveness.Vaccinating puppies at too young an age can be ineffective. The 2003 American Animal Hospital Association's (AAHA) Canine Vaccine Guidelines reports on Page 16 that: "When vaccinating an animal, the age of the animal, the animal's immune status, and interference by maternal antibodies in the development of immunity must be considered. Research has demonstrated that the presence of passively acquired maternal antibodies interferes with the immune response to many canine vaccines, including CPV, CDV, CAV-2 and rabies vaccines.” [2]As it currently stands, the law requiring puppies to be vaccinated at 4 months of age is and has been effective at controlling rabies in California’s canine population. There is no epidemiological or scientific rationale for changing this law and prematurely exposing puppies to the potentially harmful, sometimes fatal, adverse side affects of the rabies vaccine prior to the age of 4 months.On behalf of The Rabies Challenge Fund and the many concerned California pet owners who have requested our assistance, I strongly urge you to withdraw AB 272. Respectfully submitted,Kris L. ChristineFounder, Co-TrusteeTHE RABIES CHALLENGE FUNDwww.RabiesChallengeFund.orgcc: Dr. W. Jean DoddsDr. Ronald SchultzCalifornia Assembly--------------------------------------------------------------------------------[1] American Animal Hospital Association Canine Vaccine Task Force. 2006 Canine Vaccine Guidelines, Recommendations, and Supporting Literature, 28pp.[2] American Animal Hospital Association Canine Vaccine Task Force. 2003 Canine Vaccine Guidelines, Recommendations, and Supporting Literature, 28pp. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Attack Fell Terrier 864 Posted February 14, 2013 Report Share Posted February 14, 2013 What's the big deal between vaccinating at 3 months as Apposed to 4 months? I don't know what you're having a whinge about in all honesty? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kris L. Christine 2 Posted March 1, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2013 CALIFORNIA RABIESBILL AB 272 seeking to lower the required age ofvaccination for dogs from 16 weeks to 12 weeks will have ahearing 3/13/13 before the Assembly Agriculture Comittee http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/asm/ab_0251-0300/ab_272_bill_20130207_introduced.html. What You Can Do toHelp: Contact Committee Chair Susan Eggman assemblymember.eggman@assembly.ca.gov (916) 319-2013 & committee members below and ask themTO REJECT this bill. California AgricultureCommittee Members Susan T. Eggman, Chair assemblymember.eggman@assembly.ca.gov(916) 319-2013 Kristen Olsen, Vice Chair assemblymember.olsen@assembly.ca.gov (916) 319-2012 Toni Atkins assemblymember.atkins@assembly.ca.gov (916) 319-2078 Brian Dahle assemblymember.dahle@assembly.ca.gov (916) 319-2001 Richard Pan assemblymember.pan@assembly.ca.gov (916) 319-2009 Bill Quirk assemblymember.quirk@assembly.ca.gov (916) 319-2020 Marioko Yamada assemblymember.yamada@assembly.ca.gov (916) 319-2020 PERMISSION GRANTED TOCROSS-POST Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted March 1, 2013 Report Share Posted March 1, 2013 you do realise this is a uk site Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Millet 4,497 Posted March 1, 2013 Report Share Posted March 1, 2013 you do realise this is a uk site :laugh: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Millet 4,497 Posted March 1, 2013 Report Share Posted March 1, 2013 This place is fooking mad.. ..and i blame it for my laughter lines getting bigger by the minute.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kris L. Christine 2 Posted March 14, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2013 URGENT ACTION ALERT: CALIFORNIA AB 272,which would lower the age at which puppies must be vaccinated from fourmonths to three months just passed the Assembly Agriculture Committee and hasbeen assigned to the Assembly Appropriations Committee http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/asm/ab_0251-0300/ab_272_vote_20130313_000001_asm_comm.html. What You Can Do to Help: Contact Appropriations Committee members Mike Gatto(Chair) (916) 319-2043 assemblymember.gatto@asm.ca.gov& Susan T. Eggman assemblymember.eggman@asm.ca.gov(916) 319-2013 & ask them to OPPOSE AB 272. PERMISSION GRANTED TO CROSS-POST Letter from The Rabies Challenge Fund to AssemblyMembers Gatto & Eggman is below. If you would like a copy of the e-mailcorrespondence between Dr. Karen Ehnert, Dr. Dodds and me, please send me arequest at ledgespring@lincoln.midcoast.com& I will e-mail it to you.(link to committee comments on AB 272http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/asm/ab_0251-0300/ab_272_cfa_20130311_134658_asm_comm.html) March 14, 2013 Assemblymember Mike Gatto, ChairAssemblymember Susan T. Eggman, Chair RE: AB 272 An Act to Amend Section 121690 ofthe Health and Safety Code Relating to Rabies Greetings Assemblymembers Gatto and Eggman: There are some misrepresentations andinaccuracies relating to AB 272 which should be clarified before another vote istaken on this measure. On February 14, Dr. W. Jean Dodds, a Californiaveterinarian, and Co-Trustee of the Rabies Challenge Fund Charitable Trust,corrected and clarified this misinformation regarding AB 272 in an e-mail to theActing Director of Veterinary Public Health, Dr. Karen Ehnert, but apparentlythis information was not conveyed to the bill sponsor or members of theAgriculture or Appropriations Committees (see attached e-mail), or it wasdisregarded. The Agriculture Committee comments onAB 272 report that “California is the only state that sets a minimum age offour months for dogs rabies vaccination.” This statement is false. Onlytwelve (12) out of fifty (50) states require that dogs be vaccinated by 3months (Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi,Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania) . Thirteen (13) statesrequire that dogs be vaccinated by the age of 4 months (Arkansas, Florida,Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma,Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia); one (1) state (Wisconsin) requires vaccinationby 5 months; and six (6) require vaccination by the age of 6 months (Delaware,Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Tennessee, West Virginia), and twelve (12) refer tothe National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians’ Rabies Compendiumwhich recommends that rabies vaccines should be administered according to themanufacturers’ labeled instructions. Rabies vaccine labels indicate that theymay be given at 3 months, not that theymust be. It is implied in the comments that the Compendiumadvises that puppies should or must be vaccinated at 3 months of age, which isnot the case. Merial’s IMRAB rabies vaccine labelsindicate that they "can be administered to puppies as early as3 months of age" and Pfizer’s Defensor rabies vaccine labels advise thatthey are for dogs and cats “3 months of age or older.”These instructions denote the minimum age at which it is safe toadminister rabies vaccines (i.e., do not administer before 3months of age) and not a minimum age at which they must be administeredto be effective. Scientific data reflect that the later a puppy can bevaccinated, the more likely the vaccine will have the desired immunologicalresponse due to reduced interference of maternal antibodies, which are stillpresent in 3 month old puppies. The 2011 American Animal Hospital Association'sCanine Vaccine Guidelines reports that: "Because dogs older than 14-16wk of age are not likely to have interfering levels of MDA [maternallyderived antibodies], administration of a single initial dose of an infectiousvaccine to an adult dog can be expected to induce a protective immune response...... MDA is the most common reason early vaccination fails to immunize."[1] Contributing to the likelihood offailure to achieve a proper immune response to rabies vaccination at 3 months isthat puppies are finishing up their initial vaccination series of distemper,hepatitis, parvovirus at 12 weeks (3 months) of age. Addition of a rabiesvaccine into the mix will not only increase the possibility of adversereactions, but also the probability that the vaccine components will interferewith each other and neutralize or negate an appropriate immunological response.[2] [3] In her e-mailed message concerning AB272 to Dr. Dodds and me, Dr. Ehnert wrote that: “to clarify, the one wordchange allows for dogs to be vaccinated at 3 months of age, but does notmandate it.” This is a misrepresentation of the bill as worded and thecommittee summary declaring that “this bill changes, from four months tothree months, the age at which a dog is required to be vaccinated againstrabies." Addition of a clause such as "or previously vaccinated at theage of three months in another state or country with a rabies vaccine licensedby the USDA" to the current law requiring vaccination at four months wouldaccomplish that goal without changing the mandated age of vaccination to threemonths. Dr. Ehnert also explained that one ofthe reasons she has “pushed” for this change is she and the Health OfficersAssociation “… want to give owners the opportunity to vaccinate puppiesearlier when there is increased risk. The past two years we have seen a 4 -5fold increase in bat rabies in LA County, with some areas being hot spots.”There has been no escalation in canine rabies corresponding to the increase inbat rabies, which according to the Department of Health’s Reported AnimalRabies, for Los Angeles County there were no cases of rabid dogs from 2010through 2012, while there were 114 rabid bats (22 in 2010, 38 in 2011, and 54 in2012—representing an increase of nearly 2.5 times instead of a 4-5 foldincrease). Statewide, there have only been three cases of rabies in dogs since2007, as opposed to 981 rabid bats and 147 rabid skunks for the same period,which evidences the fact that the current law requiring puppies to be vaccinatedagainst rabies by 4 months of age is effective at controlling rabies inCalifornia’s canine community and does not need to be changed. To address the concern over a risingincrease in rabies in the bat population spilling over into the domestic petpopulation, Dr. Ehnert and other members of the Health Officers Association ofCalifornia should request introduction of a bill requiring that all cats inCalifornia be vaccinated against rabies, as cats are reported to be 4 times aslikely to be infected with rabies as dogs.[4] The Chair of the Compendium ofAnimal Rabies Prevention and Control Committee, Dr. Catherine M. Brown, statedthat “because more rabies cases are reported annually involving cats…thandogs, vaccination of cats should be required.” As it currently stands, the law requiring puppiesto be vaccinated at 4 months of age is and has been effective at controllingrabies in California’s canine population. There is no epidemiological orscientific rationale for changing this law and prematurely exposing puppies tothe potentially harmful, sometimes fatal, adverse side affects of the rabiesvaccine prior to the age of 4 months. On behalf of The Rabies Challenge Fund, aregistered California Charitable Trust, and the many concerned California petowners who have requested our assistance, I strongly urge you to oppose passageof AB 272 as it is currently written. Respectfully submitted, Kris L. ChristineFounder, Co-TrusteeTHERABIES CHALLENGE FUNDwww.RabiesChallengeFund.orgledgespring@lincoln.midcoast.com Pages: 8 Attachment: 1 cc: Dr. W. Jean DoddsDr. RonaldSchultzAssemblymember Jimmy GomezCaliforniaAssembly--------------------------------------------------------------------------------[1]American Animal Hospital Association Canine Vaccine Task Force. 2011 CanineVaccine Guidelines, Recommendations, and Supporting Literature, p.12[2]American Animal Hospital Association Canine Vaccine Task Force. 2003 CanineVaccine Guidelines, Recommendations, and Supporting Literature, p.16[3]Moore, et als., Adverse Events Diagnosed Within Three Days of VaccineAdministration in Dogs; Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.,Vol. 227, No. 7, October 1, 2005[4] Blanton JD, et al. Rabies Surveillancein the United States During 2008. Journal of the American Veterinary MedicalAssociation 2009; 235: 676-690. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.