Born Hunter 17,832 Posted January 24, 2013 Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-21172033 Looks like the yanks have come over all PC and are now going to allow women to serve in front line combat roles including top end infantry units, US Rangers, Green Berets and even the likes of Delta and SEALs. It's certainly equality but is it sensible? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tegater 789 Posted January 24, 2013 Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 They'd be rubbish at interrogation and negotiation Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted January 24, 2013 Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 Think it's wrong myself, but i assume they'll have to pass the same selection process as the men so I doubt many will make it through in practice.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
whippet 99 2,613 Posted January 24, 2013 Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 as long as theres kitchens/cleaning on the front line i cant see the problem................ 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,832 Posted January 24, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 They'd be rubbish at interrogation and negotiation Women don't negotiate! "where's the bomb!?............................ not gonna tell me? Fine, we'll launch full scale nuclear attack! followed by the silent treatment" 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gonetoearth 5,144 Posted January 24, 2013 Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 Lets cut to the chase. If a woman is caught. Name rank and number yeh. Then what would a gang of rag heads then do normaly i would say use your imagination in the case lets be frank she would get abused sexualy without a doupt and for that reason women would put every one in the unit at risk End of. What women would want that on their mind 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted January 24, 2013 Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 if there up to the job then fine, but no special dispensation should be given Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted January 24, 2013 Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 They'd be rubbish at interrogation and negotiation Women don't negotiate! "where's the bomb!?............................ not gonna tell me? Fine, we'll launch full scale nuclear attack! followed by the silent treatment" I can't stand sulking f*****g women, they'd only have to sit there with the face on and keep answering 'nothing!' when asked what their f*****g problem is and I'd crack after about 10 minutes and tell her everything she wanted to know! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,832 Posted January 24, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 Of course, they should have to pass the same selection and training as any other soldier, commando course or similar to prove they are the equal of a male soldier. But that's not my problem with it, they're gonna be targeted and used as emotional blackmail. Dress it up how you like, but a video of a woman being abused will cause a media shit storm compared to a male soldier, those that have to make tough decisions will potentially be forced into the wrong decision. What about intimate relationships that will enevitably develop? I'm asking questions because I don't have the experience to say how this would affect the effectiveness of a front line troop. Just seems dangerous to me. The MOD aren't following suit......... yet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kay 3,709 Posted January 24, 2013 Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 Women played a massive roll in the 2 wars , code breakers etc , maybe not on the frontline but they still played a very important roll http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2217906/Fearless-World-War-Two-woman-spy-dropped-submarine-occupied-Norway-Bletchley-Park-codebreaker-dies-aged-91.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOPPER 1,809 Posted January 24, 2013 Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 if you seen some of the things purporting to be women walking the streets of bristol on a friday and saturday night the frontline sthe best place for them any raghead would run a mile and as for sexauly abused theyed teach the ragheads all about abuse 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gonetoearth 5,144 Posted January 24, 2013 Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 Women played a massive roll in the 2 wars , code breakers etc , maybe not on the frontline but they still played a very important roll http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2217906/Fearless-World-War-Two-woman-spy-dropped-submarine-occupied-Norway-Bletchley-Park-codebreaker-dies-aged-91.html . Kay i sit and listern to a great ant when she comes up from devon she tells harrowing tales she was waff Women serve and serve with great proffesionilisam but kay think of the real conciqenses of a women in front line opps you dont have think for long war and men !!!!!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Malt 379 Posted January 24, 2013 Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 Women played a massive roll in the 2 wars , code breakers etc , maybe not on the frontline but they still played a very important roll http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2217906/Fearless-World-War-Two-woman-spy-dropped-submarine-occupied-Norway-Bletchley-Park-codebreaker-dies-aged-91.html I don't think anybodies saying women can't contribute Kay, but I don't personally think the front lines of battle are any place for a woman, even more so in the type of situations that the current conflicts throw up.. In counties like Afghanistan, their own women are treated as second class citizens and dirt with no rights.. The capture of a woman solider and what she would be subjected to in one of these shitholes don't bear thinking about for me.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,832 Posted January 24, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 Women played a massive roll in the 2 wars , code breakers etc , maybe not on the frontline but they still played a very important roll http://www.dailymail...es-aged-91.html And they still do Kay, I graduated with a girl that went to Sandhurst, one of the guns is in the RAF Regiment. where he met his wife and another guns daughter is currently in Afghanistan. Also women serving in the likes of the British Special Forces Special Reconnaissance Regiment. Plenty in Intelligence gathering services, MI5, GCHQ etc. But front line combat roles like RMs, Paras, rifles, gaurds etc and even special forces? I just think a dangerous decision to make. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tegater 789 Posted January 24, 2013 Report Share Posted January 24, 2013 Women played a massive roll in the 2 wars , code breakers etc , maybe not on the frontline but they still played a very important roll http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2217906/Fearless-World-War-Two-woman-spy-dropped-submarine-occupied-Norway-Bletchley-Park-codebreaker-dies-aged-91.html The Russians had some of the very best female snipers in the 2nd WW. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.