32-Foot Dig

[BOG SIDE 82]

WANKERS

[frazdog 252]

1. 07835884503
   

[hunting1234 122]

1. 07835884503
   

Edited January 26, 2013 by hunting1234

[Millet 4,497]

Here is a picture i was emailed earlier of the ascent..the belmin is in the bag by the way..

 

[R.A.W 1,987]

Here is a picture i was emailed earlier of the ascent..the belmin is in the bag by the way..

 

 

did 07835884503 show up on the box

Edited January 26, 2013 by R.A.W

[Millet 4,497]

Funny enough no the last number was different for some reason.. ..no wonder no one can get through..

[THE GENERAL 1,982]

It's a shame these lads lost a good bitch especially on a dig as deep as that. Rather than argue over a few feet as what depth the hole looked in the pic and the method they used. They shared it with everyone and that's it. Any man on here trying to make a joke out off another mans loss in a situation like that, aint got much morals and obviously have never dug half that depth for a terrier before.

[longnancys 49]

Here is a picture i was emailed earlier of the ascent..the belmin is in the bag by the way..

 

was thinking they were in an old mine or quarry myself

[R.A.W 1,987]

It's a shame these lads lost a good bitch especially on a dig as deep as that. Rather than argue over a few feet as what depth the hole looked in the pic and the method they used. They shared it with everyone and that's it. Any man on here trying to make a joke out off another mans loss in a situation like that, aint got much morals and obviously have never dug half that depth for a terrier before.

 

take some time to read the thread mate.

 

i have empathy for any man/woman that loses a dog.there is no argument of how deep the hole is or the method. when questions are ask which they should be on an open forum they are not answered which in turn muddies the authenticity of there claim.

 

i for one was looking forward to this thread but i'm too long in the tooth to believe every word that every man says, without asking the appropriate questions.

[whippet 99 2,613]

It's a shame these lads lost a good bitch especially on a dig as deep as that. Rather than argue over a few feet as what depth the hole looked in the pic and the method they used. They shared it with everyone and that's it. Any man on here trying to make a joke out off another mans loss in a situation like that, aint got much morals and obviously have never dug half that depth for a terrier before.

 

take some time to read the thread mate.

 

i have empathy for any man/woman that loses a dog.there is no argument of how deep the hole is or the method. when questions are ask which they should be on an open forum they are not answered which in turn muddies the authenticity of there claim.

 

i for one was looking forward to this thread but i'm too long in the tooth to believe every word that every man says, without asking the appropriate questions.

you put that well , very true..........

and when you do ask questions your so -called knocking the lads...................no win situation , .................lol

[max33 5]

It's a shame these lads lost a good bitch especially on a dig as deep as that. Rather than argue over a few feet as what depth the hole looked in the pic and the method they used. They shared it with everyone and that's it. Any man on here trying to make a joke out off another mans loss in a situation like that, aint got much morals and obviously have never dug half that depth for a terrier before.

 

take some time to read the thread mate.

 

i have empathy for any man/woman that loses a dog.there is no argument of how deep the hole is or the method. when questions are ask which they should be on an open forum they are not answered which in turn muddies the authenticity of there claim.

 

i for one was looking forward to this thread but i'm too long in the tooth to believe every word that every man says, without asking the appropriate questions.

It's a shame these lads lost a good bitch especially on a dig as deep as that. Rather than argue over a few feet as what depth the hole looked in the pic and the method they used. They shared it with everyone and that's it. Any man on here trying to make a joke out off another mans loss in a situation like that, aint got much morals and obviously have never dug half that depth for a terrier before.

 

take some time to read the thread mate.

 

i have empathy for any man/woman that loses a dog.there is no argument of how deep the hole is or the method. when questions are ask which they should be on an open forum they are not answered which in turn muddies the authenticity of there claim.

 

i for one was looking forward to this thread but i'm too long in the tooth to believe every word that every man says, without asking the appropriate questions.

the general you need to take a second look 32ft come on well said r.a.w

[max33 5]

sorry about the bitch not nice to here about anyloss .but for god sake i live very close to these boys and the talk about here is the dog is still in the hole so dont believe everything you here.there is some s--t getting talking about here at the minute take it from me 32 ft aye right

Edited January 27, 2013 by max33

[BOG SIDE 82]

LIKE I SAID WANKERS

[frazdog 252]

1. look at pics the bellman dnt lie.n the bitch is in hole dead 32ft dwn.ye.s are al bigmen on website pun up comments.if u tink am lyn why dont you fne me.07835884503
   

[THE GENERAL 1,982]

It's a shame these lads lost a good bitch especially on a dig as deep as that. Rather than argue over a few feet as what depth the hole looked in the pic and the method they used. They shared it with everyone and that's it. Any man on here trying to make a joke out off another mans loss in a situation like that, aint got much morals and obviously have never dug half that depth for a terrier before.

 

take some time to read the thread mate.

 

i have empathy for any man/woman that loses a dog.there is no argument of how deep the hole is or the method. when questions are ask which they should be on an open forum they are not answered which in turn muddies the authenticity of there claim.

 

i for one was looking forward to this thread but i'm too long in the tooth to believe every word that every man says, without asking the appropriate questions.

It's a shame these lads lost a good bitch especially on a dig as deep as that. Rather than argue over a few feet as what depth the hole looked in the pic and the method they used. They shared it with everyone and that's it. Any man on here trying to make a joke out off another mans loss in a situation like that, aint got much morals and obviously have never dug half that depth for a terrier before.

 

take some time to read the thread mate.

 

i have empathy for any man/woman that loses a dog.there is no argument of how deep the hole is or the method. when questions are ask which they should be on an open forum they are not answered which in turn muddies the authenticity of there claim.

 

i for one was looking forward to this thread but i'm too long in the tooth to believe every word that every man says, without asking the appropriate questions.

the general you need to take a second look 32ft come on well said r.a.w

Max did you read my comment ? It looks a deep dig to me so the precise depth isn't really a big issue IMO.