forest of dean redneck 11,599 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 I supposed they forced him to look at,store and distribute the images as well? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Milwr Jr. 99 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 (edited) see, the thing i find even more disturbing about the lostprohets guy is that they also charged 20yr and 24yr old girls with the same thing....... were they that star struck that he managed to get them to take part in his sick little world??? You're putting all the blame on him. Have you considered the possibility that maybe they converted him ? Have you considered the possibility that maybe all three were engaged in these acts prior to meeting each other ? It's people like you, illogical morons slinging shit around that are ruining the human race. possible yes . likely, no i dont think so. the vast majority of conversion / grooming in the reported and proven cases will involve an older male and younger people, like it or not , thats what will probably be proven. ruining the human race? me? i think you'll find its sick fcuks that are praying on the weak and defenceless. I didn't say you were praying on the weak and defenceless, I accused you of being an illogical moron, who throws unfounded assumptions around, and that is what is ruining the human race, the lack of logic and intellect in the common human being. If we all f*****g thought a little more and stopped being so f*****g ignorant and moronic our race would be a thousand years ahead of it's current state. Paid: His post was illogical because he assumed that the man was the one who converted the women without any proof. I'm not saying this isn't the case, but until the FACTS come to light, his assumption is illogical. And I'm not star struck, I simply cannot stand moronic points thrown about as if they were gospel. Edited December 19, 2012 by Milwr Jr. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Paid 935 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 I'm going to just throw out an unfounded assumption that you are a bit of a twat Jr 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Milwr Jr. 99 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 I'm going to just throw out an unfounded assumption that you are a bit of a twat Jr I'm more of a c**t really. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Paid 935 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 One and the same thing. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jonah. 775 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 I'm going to just throw out an unfounded assumption that you are a bit of a twat Jr I'm more of a c**t really. agreed, now go and take down your lostprohet's posters and bin their CD's before ya mates come round to celebrate xmas with ya.... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Milwr Jr. 99 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 (edited) c**t (2nd definition): A contemptible person. Twat (3rd definition): A foolish or despicable person. I'm amazed at myself, I managed to act a complete c**t whilst pointing out the differences in your argument, that's a new level of cunty-ness even for me. I'm proud. Jonah: I don't own any Lostprophets CD's or posters. There go those moronic assumptions of yours being plucked out of thin air again. Edited December 19, 2012 by Milwr Jr. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chris87 297 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 Should castrate the fuckers if you ask me!! whats wrong with a 20 year old girl ffs Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sniffer 167 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 see, the thing i find even more disturbing about the lostprohets guy is that they also charged 20yr and 24yr old girls with the same thing....... were they that star struck that he managed to get them to take part in his sick little world??? You're putting all the blame on him. Have you considered the possibility that maybe they converted him ? Have you considered the possibility that maybe all three were engaged in these acts prior to meeting each other ? It's people like you, illogical morons slinging shit around that are ruining the human race. Its in black and white you fecking fool HE IS A NONCE.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Milwr Jr. 99 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 Its in black and white you fecking fool HE IS A NONCE.. I hadn't realized that BBC news was fact these days, which is rich coming from them considering their track record with known child molesters. And technically they don't say he's a nonce, they say he is ACCUSED of being a nonce. I don't really care wether he is or isn't, I've only stuck in this thread so far to piss a few people off. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sniffer 167 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 Well done Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jonah. 775 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 Well done my thoughts exactly, he's clearly a little troll and purely out for the rise, he'll be getting nowt from me anymore... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Milwr Jr. 99 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Moscow Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 We get banned from running our dogs by this More recently Anthony Charles Lynton Blair AKA Tony Blair, found himself in court for toilet, todger tugging: He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street magistrates court for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get sexual favour from the other man, little did he know that the toilet was being watched by police. Blair was fined £500, and walked away with nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to cover who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends in court got him off with a fine, because he is one of them. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jonah. 775 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 We get banned from running our dogs by this More recently Anthony Charles Lynton Blair AKA Tony Blair, found himself in court for toilet, todger tugging: He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street magistrates court for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get sexual favour from the other man, little did he know that the toilet was being watched by police. Blair was fined £500, and walked away with nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to cover who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends in court got him off with a fine, because he is one of them. where did ya get that info from ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.