Jump to content

Another American school massacre


Recommended Posts

They should look at the Law on Guns without a Doudt , who in there right mind needs An Arsenal off Weapons for protection , 6 guns this Woman had ?? Assault Rifle for protection , that's not right , a Gun at home for Protection yes but 6 and the calibre off them is surely over the top and the reason she had them . . . Cause She Could !!

 

As you know matey, ( and so does the gun lobby in the states) any type of control is a thin end of a wedge.....as far as I am concerned, someone can own a bazooka as long as they are sensible with it and don't go off killing people.

 

If you want something, you should be FREE to have it as long as you don't intend harm to others with it!!

 

Based on the anti gun logic, they should take everyone's driving license away as I reckon cars kill more kids every day that guns do in a year or even 10 years.

Wilf your not a fool mate , so to compare somebody being careless/wreck less/unfortunate where a car accident takes a kids life to someone Arming themselves with Assault Rifle And Handguns , going into a School and shooting Children is Ridiculous , my point is I bet there's not 1 woman in the U.K who has that type off Arsenal to Protect Herself . . . Why , Because the Process to get that type off Weapons is too Strict ,and the only reason she had them was BECAUSE SHE COULD . . . If she Didnt have them who's to say he'd off carried out this Carnage , I'm not saying it wouldn't off happened but it just might not off !

You just had to mention Arsenal didn't you! :laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I have little nippers so I understand the emotions only too well but you have to keep things in context, there's about 8 billion people on this planet and this incident involved 27 of them!   Not ex

thank f**k thats one culture we didnt embrace from over the pond.

yea the goverment killed 5 year olds!   i can just imagine the type of c**t who wrote that email,the type of c**t who should have his guns taken off him.

They should look at the Law on Guns without a Doudt , who in there right mind needs An Arsenal off Weapons for protection , 6 guns this Woman had ?? Assault Rifle for protection , that's not right , a Gun at home for Protection yes but 6 and the calibre off them is surely over the top and the reason she had them . . . Cause She Could !!

 

As you know matey, ( and so does the gun lobby in the states) any type of control is a thin end of a wedge.....as far as I am concerned, someone can own a bazooka as long as they are sensible with it and don't go off killing people.

 

If you want something, you should be FREE to have it as long as you don't intend harm to others with it!!

 

Based on the anti gun logic, they should take everyone's driving license away as I reckon cars kill more kids every day that guns do in a year or even 10 years.

Wilf your not a fool mate , so to compare somebody being careless/wreck less/unfortunate where a car accident takes a kids life to someone Arming themselves with Assault Rifle And Handguns , going into a School and shooting Children is Ridiculous , my point is I bet there's not 1 woman in the U.K who has that type off Arsenal to Protect Herself . . . Why , Because the Process to get that type off Weapons is too Strict ,and the only reason she had them was BECAUSE SHE COULD . . . If she Didnt have them who's to say he'd off carried out this Carnage , I'm not saying it wouldn't off happened but it just might not off !

You just had to mention Arsenal didn't you! :laugh:

 

Who :laugh:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

They should look at the Law on Guns without a Doudt , who in there right mind needs An Arsenal off Weapons for protection , 6 guns this Woman had ?? Assault Rifle for protection , that's not right , a Gun at home for Protection yes but 6 and the calibre off them is surely over the top and the reason she had them . . . Cause She Could !!

 

As you know matey, ( and so does the gun lobby in the states) any type of control is a thin end of a wedge.....as far as I am concerned, someone can own a bazooka as long as they are sensible with it and don't go off killing people.

 

If you want something, you should be FREE to have it as long as you don't intend harm to others with it!!

 

Based on the anti gun logic, they should take everyone's driving license away as I reckon cars kill more kids every day that guns do in a year or even 10 years.

Wilf your not a fool mate , so to compare somebody being careless/wreck less/unfortunate where a car accident takes a kids life to someone Arming themselves with Assault Rifle And Handguns , going into a School and shooting Children is Ridiculous , my point is I bet there's not 1 woman in the U.K who has that type off Arsenal to Protect Herself . . . Why , Because the Process to get that type off Weapons is too Strict ,and the only reason she had them was BECAUSE SHE COULD . . . If she Didnt have them who's to say he'd off carried out this Carnage , I'm not saying it wouldn't off happened but it just might not off !

You just had to mention Arsenal didn't you! :laugh:

 

Who :laugh:

:laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

one innocent kid is to much imo.

when kids are helping themselfs to guns out thier parent arsenal and shooting up schools.i think its really about time they needed to have a rethink.im not anti guns bte,and yes a keeper or farmer can go on a gun crazy rampage,im not disputing that mate.bird.hamilton being the ones that spring to mind.shotguns rifles for hunting no prob with that at all.handguns assault rifles well no c**t other thn police or millitary should own such weapons imo. why the f**k would you need to anyway?

 

if there was 5 more dublanes since the original would you still think its acceptable going by there 70 million live in this country?how many would still send thier kids to school if it was happening here?

Plenty of terrier men, hunt staff, stalkers, keepers and slaughter men use handguns everyday as tools of their trade how is a pistol any more dangerous than say a 12 shot shotgun or a 25 shot semi auto ruger 10, 22?

Edited by danw
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

both will kill you thats for sure,even a bolt gun although the body count wouldnt be in high numbers with that,look bud im not being a smart arse here,and no way am i condeming your sport or shooting pastime,but come on surely you can see what im getting at.kids go to school to be educated and feel safe. a nation who gives you a free gun for opening a bank account!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

both will kill you thats for sure,even a bolt gun although the body count wouldnt be in high numbers with that,look bud im not being a smart arse here,and no way am i condeming your sport or shooting pastime,but come on surely you can see what im getting at.kids go to school to be educated and feel safe. a nation who gives you a free gun for opening a bank account!

I agree pretty much education a change in societys perception of guns which films glamorise far to much and tighter restrictions on age limits for violent computer games would all help but i dont think any more guns need banning far better to ban unsuitable people with tighter licencing criteria

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh i think the gun laws here are ok. there strict and when the odd occasion someone does flip well i can accept that,for what it is.a loony ,and yes thyere not really much we can do about that,other than checking with a dr or independent shrink,and even then they dont always pick up on it.however america is a diffrent ball game,they really need to take some of the arms caches folk are stockpiling for god knows what reason,there nation spends the most amount of cash thn any other nation on the f*****g planet.im pretty sure there military can repel any invasion.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

They should look at the Law on Guns without a Doudt , who in there right mind needs An Arsenal off Weapons for protection , 6 guns this Woman had ?? Assault Rifle for protection , that's not right , a Gun at home for Protection yes but 6 and the calibre off them is surely over the top and the reason she had them . . . Cause She Could !!

 

As you know matey, ( and so does the gun lobby in the states) any type of control is a thin end of a wedge.....as far as I am concerned, someone can own a bazooka as long as they are sensible with it and don't go off killing people.

 

If you want something, you should be FREE to have it as long as you don't intend harm to others with it!!

 

Based on the anti gun logic, they should take everyone's driving license away as I reckon cars kill more kids every day that guns do in a year or even 10 years.

Wilf your not a fool mate , so to compare somebody being careless/wreck less/unfortunate where a car accident takes a kids life to someone Arming themselves with Assault Rifle And Handguns , going into a School and shooting Children is Ridiculous , my point is I bet there's not 1 woman in the U.K who has that type off Arsenal to Protect Herself . . . Why , Because the Process to get that type off Weapons is too Strict ,and the only reason she had them was BECAUSE SHE COULD . . . If she Didnt have them who's to say he'd off carried out this Carnage , I'm not saying it wouldn't off happened but it just might not off !

 

Fair comment mate, I'm just not that comfortable with giving any government the green light to pass more law.....the end result is normally they abuse the power.

 

Once you go down that road, you end up where we are as a country, with a government riding roughshod over our liberties almost on a daily basis......just look at Blair, 3000 more laws and no one batted an eye lid!!

 

It's a terrible thing what has happened to these young innocent children and I am the worlds worst worrier when it comes to my kids but I am doing them no favours either by allowing the government more control over their future life........god knows they deserve better than we are getting served up.

 

Tragic, terrible and absolutely heart breaking but IMHO there's nothing anyone can do to prevent things like this no matter how much law you pass.

Atb

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

ive just recieved a random email from amd address ive never heard of:

 

The primary-school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, approximately 45 miles from the Colt Arms Factory, is just another one in the long line of government psyops designed to persuade the public to allow the government to take away their guns, and their means to defend themselves against the government and the banksters that the politicians really serve.The small children murders are designed to create hysterical emotions in women to get them to demand that guns are banned. If that doesn’t work they will continue with their evil agenda with worse and worse atrocities on younger children, until they get their way and disarm the people, so that they cannot fight back against government tyranny.Newtown is the U.S.A.’s Dunblane, which was orchestrated in Scotland in 1996 by the British establishment, to whip up hysteria in order to ban all handguns from the U.K. It was a follow-up to the Hungerford Massacre in England in 1987, which was carried out by mind-controlled Michael Ryan, who then shot himself so he could not be questioned, and it was used to ban semi-automatic rifles and shotguns.It’s always the same people behind it – the gun-grabbers who want the people to be defenceless against the gun-grabbers’ employers – the banksters who own all of the politicians. They get their politicians to pass legislation for them, in order to remove the people’s freedoms and means of defending themselves, and enslave them in a draconian police-state, under a mountain of debt, and then exterminate the useless-eaters.

 

The Dunblane massacre was supposedly carried out by Thomas Hamilton, who was a paedophile and procurer of children, for a high level paedophile ring involving senior members of the Tony Blair Labour-Party shadow-cabinet and others. The massacre served two purposes, it achieved their desired handgun-ban and killed the abused children, so they could not be witnesses against the elite-paedophiles. They then had the findings of the inquiry sealed for 100 years, which is proof of the above.Like Newtown there were two shooters, Hamilton and a hit-man who shot Hamilton and made it look like Hamilton committed suicide after shooting 16 children, so that he couldn’t be questioned. Hamilton was found in the school gymnasium slumped against a wall and still gurgling, when an off-duty policeman PC Grant McCutcheon entered the gym and saw two semi-automatic pistols, one on either side of Hamilton’s body.The autopsy revealed that Hamilton was killed with a .38 revolver. These people always slip-up with their crimes. There was no .38 revolver for him to have shot himself with. Thus, there was a second shooter who killed Hamilton.Similarly, the first reports from Newtown were of two shooters, just like mind-controlled James Holmes in the Denver Batman Cinema massacre, the story then quickly changes to just one.Columbine was similar, in that a team of shooters in black outfits were seen there and the two accused were on mind-altering prescription-drugs.Wake up and see the pattern and their modus operandi and don’t fall for it. Never let them take your guns, except from your cold dead hands.

 

All of these are staged events to whip-up hysterical public support for banning the people from having guns. It works the same in every country – Hungerford in England, Dunblane in Scotland, Port Arthur in Australia and the list in America is endless, because of the Second Amendment and the people having a pro-gun culture. That makes it much more difficult to break the Americans’ love of guns and the Second Amendment, which was put in place to protect the people from the government.Gun bans work well for tyrants. They worked well for Hitler, Stalin and Chairman Mao, to name just three.If you want to stop these massacres, wake-up and get rid of the banksters, their puppet-politicians and all gun-grabbers; arm teachers and ban gun-free zones.From one who can see the pattern and hopes to enable you to see it too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nonsense......as much as we like to find a " reason" for everything as a society, the fact is sometimes there just isn't one and that's what we find hardest to deal with.

 

A man went nuts, end of story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gun's don't kill people..fact...... a ban will never work in America... even if it did , you'l get some f*****g nutter who wants to kill kids hopping borders into states to buy legal semtex/C4 rig a school up or fill a van up and drive in to a school and blow shit loads more up !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have little nippers so I understand the emotions only too well but you have to keep things in context, there's about 8 billion people on this planet and this incident involved 27 of them!

 

Not exactly a good reason the ban legal gun ownership anywhere......same as after Dunblane, now the only people with handguns are the nutters.......brilliant bit of legislation!!! That put a stop to gun crime didn't it !!!!

i feel your opionion may differ if you had lost a nipper this way.........................as for emotions , you havent got a clue what those people who lost children are going through as well as children who witnessed it , easy to talk about it openly as if its just a fact of life get on with it attitude........

no respect , just another statistic..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have little nippers so I understand the emotions only too well but you have to keep things in context, there's about 8 billion people on this planet and this incident involved 27 of them!

 

Not exactly a good reason the ban legal gun ownership anywhere......same as after Dunblane, now the only people with handguns are the nutters.......brilliant bit of legislation!!! That put a stop to gun crime didn't it !!!!

i feel your opionion may differ if you had lost a nipper this way.........................as for emotions , you havent got a clue what those people who lost children are going through as well as children who witnessed it , easy to talk about it openly as if its just a fact of life get on with it attitude........

no respect , just another statistic..............

 

Likewise, no good decision was ever made off of the back of such intense raw emotion. What the families are feeling must be hell but right now their opinions on guns mean very little. Any decisions need to be made by impartial intelligent people removed from such a situation with a full understanding of both sides. The families of those involved certainly don not fit that criteria.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...