D-Day! (Renamed to "The re-education and crushing defeat of the fatally idealistic Mr Miles")

[stabba 10,745]

So in a nutshell....Your a Tramp :laugh:

[milegajo 595]

So in a nutshell....Your a Tramp :laugh:

 

"Tramp" conjures the image of a man huddled on a pavement with his hand out and questionable, if existent, standards of personal hygiene...

 

Not an accurate summation to me. Though some may question my hygiene at times!

[Paid 935]

You put your family through all this too ?

[milegajo 595]

You put your family through all this too ?

 

No. Mr Amaury and Mr Detmar Blow have chosen to pay Sherbond and others to subject us to this.

[Buch 145]

Look at it from the other point of view. Why are you more entitled to do what you want with the land than some one else is? If its all about the "space that you exist in" then whats to stop me waiting till you and your family nip out and moving into your house or caravan or what ever t is you live in? How long does some one not have to be "in" before you can "exist in there space"? How detached does some one have to be from there land before your happy to help yourself?

[milegajo 595]

Look at it from the other point of view. Why are you more entitled to do what you want with the land than some one else is? If its all about the "space that you exist in" then whats to stop me waiting till you and your family nip out and moving into your house or caravan or what ever t is you live in? How long does some one not have to be "in" before you can "exist in there space"? How detached does some one have to be from there land before your happy to help yourself?

 

I think i've answered the above in previous replies.

 

For instance, causing no harm, injury or loss. My being and where that is causes no deprivation nor hardship to any other human being. The actions you describe, would.

If you neglect something to the point it appears abandoned, you evidently have no need of it. If another can put it to use, I see no justifiable reason to deny them.

[paulus 26]

Look at it from the other point of view. Why are you more entitled to do what you want with the land than some one else is? If its all about the "space that you exist in" then whats to stop me waiting till you and your family nip out and moving into your house or caravan or what ever t is you live in? How long does some one not have to be "in" before you can "exist in there space"? How detached does some one have to be from there land before your happy to help yourself?

 

I think i've answered the above in previous replies.

 

For instance, causing no harm, injury or loss. My being and where that is causes no deprivation nor hardship to any other human being. The actions you describe, would.

If you neglect something to the point it appears abandoned, you evidently have no need of it. If another can put it to use, I see no justifiable reason to deny them.

 

 

if by neglect you mean not used for a while and whilst it might at first seem abandoned then to take without permision of the owner it would still be theft. farmyards are full of piles of neglected and abandoned things but that doesnt mean anyone can or should just walk in and help themselves.

[Pink or stink 162]

 

If you neglect something to the point it appears abandoned, you evidently have no need of it. If another can put it to use, I see no justifiable reason to deny them.

 

I wonder how many "thieves" have used this as a defence when up before the beak.

[torchey 1,328]

no one likes the gypo,s just pulling up and making home, what makes what your doing any different ??

]

he's not turning the place into a shit hole..maybe...

if everyone done it they would be shit holes...maybe...

[milegajo 595]

Of course, if I were bestowed more acres of land than I had need of, would I have the same view as I do now?

 

I can't answer that with any certainty. Nor do I need to, the value for me is in the asking, not the answering of that question.

[milegajo 595]

To answer paulus, you would of course need to be the owner to have suffered any percieved loss.

 

This is the crux in this instance. Ownership is not contested in that i claim the land, rather I require the owner, if he exists, to substantiate his claim so that we may enter negotiations knowing who is who.

 

A case of: "Show me the deeds!"

[Born Hunter 17,774]

I think you were born in the wrong time and place mate. I think it's clear you mean no harm but this modern society is so clearly destined to clash with your views and choice of existance. You're thoughts seem to mirror that of many nomadic aboriginal peoples.

[Mawders 595]

I've got a pallet of good never been used house bricks out the side of my house that have been there nearly a year now, I sure as hell wish someone would help themselves and shift them for me but instead someone decided to pinch my recycling box.

 

The worlds a f****d up place! A thief that cares for the planets recycling needs!

 

Was it you Milegajo! Lol

[paulus 26]

To answer paulus, you would of course need to be the owner to have suffered any percieved loss.

 

This is the crux in this instance. Ownership is not contested in that i claim the land, rather I require the owner, if he exists, to substantiate his claim so that we may enter negotiations knowing who is who.

 

A case of: "Show me the deeds!"

does the land registory not know who owns it

[gonetoearth 5,144]

So your a sqauter , its not your land , MOVE