whippet 99 2,613 Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 here we go again,.................the mag is shite but the people who contribute to it arnt,....................here we go , its either ass licking or back peddling Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gonetoearth 5,144 Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 Cuntry mans sneakly. Likes to run with the hare and the hounds Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Moscow Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 Mags shit and the people who write in it have there own conscience to question! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Strong Stuff 2,171 Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 here we go again,.................the mag is shite but the people who contribute to it arnt,....................here we go , its either ass licking or back peddling What colour is the sky in your world? I am deffo not an ass licker, and I don't go backwards. It is not JD's fault they printed that, and more than it is Skycats fault, it was the editorial team who included that. Now .............. if the people who contribute to it, continue to do so after the CMW published that, then they only have themselves to blame if they are tarred with the same brush, but I can hardly see JD saying poachers are violent criminals or associating himself with those who do spread that rubbish. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
graham4877 1,181 Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 here's a start boys https://www.(!64.56:886/pages/The-Countrymans-Weekly/107058952705974?ref=ts&fref=ts Quote Link to post Share on other sites
markja 51 Posted December 2, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 i dont mind there articles. but it would be nice to hear jd's and scycat's opinions off what fellow lurcher folk are accused off but i dont think they will want to upset the cmw top brass. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
whippet 99 2,613 Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 here we go again,.................the mag is shite but the people who contribute to it arnt,....................here we go , its either ass licking or back peddling What colour is the sky in your world? I am deffo not an ass licker, and I don't go backwards. It is not JD's fault they printed that, and more than it is Skycats fault, it was the editorial team who included that. Now .............. if the people who contribute to it, continue to do so after the CMW published that, then they only have themselves to blame if they are tarred with the same brush, but I can hardly see JD saying poachers are violent criminals or associating himself with those who do spread that rubbish. you sound like you care Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted December 2, 2012 Report Share Posted December 2, 2012 its fairly simple if you want to read it then buy it, if you don`t then don`t Quote Link to post Share on other sites
skycat 6,173 Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 what does people exspect with farmers getting ran over etc.............. Maybe an article on how not all dog lads are criminals and those that are only represent a tiny unwanted minority, the same minority you'd find attracted to any "hobby". Coming right up! I've been working on this in my head for the last few weeks, wondering how best to word a retaliatory article without alienating anyone at all: feckin' impossible really! Ever the diplomat ,I have been finding it hard to say what I want without downright attacking certain factions within field sports: I know what it's like to be tarred with the same brush as those who are blatantly criminal in their actions, at the same time as feeling angry at our loss of freedom due to the ban. Whichever way you look at it, lurchers have been traditionally ostracised by the more 'main stream' sporting factions, but this is one instance which needs answering as bluntly as possible given the constrictions of the publication. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 what does people exspect with farmers getting ran over etc.............. Maybe an article on how not all dog lads are criminals and those that are only represent a tiny unwanted minority, the same minority you'd find attracted to any "hobby". Coming right up! I've been working on this in my head for the last few weeks, wondering how best to word a retaliatory article without alienating anyone at all: feckin' impossible really! Ever the diplomat ,I have been finding it hard to say what I want without downright attacking certain factions within field sports: I know what it's like to be tarred with the same brush as those who are blatantly criminal in their actions, at the same time as feeling angry at our loss of freedom due to the ban. Whichever way you look at it, lurchers have been traditionally ostracised by the more 'main stream' sporting factions, but this is one instance which needs answering as bluntly as possible given the constrictions of the publication. not a easy task to undertake, your damned if you do and damned if you don`t. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
graham4877 1,181 Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 what does people exspect with farmers getting ran over etc.............. Maybe an article on how not all dog lads are criminals and those that are only represent a tiny unwanted minority, the same minority you'd find attracted to any "hobby". Coming right up! I've been working on this in my head for the last few weeks, wondering how best to word a retaliatory article without alienating anyone at all: feckin' impossible really! Ever the diplomat ,I have been finding it hard to say what I want without downright attacking certain factions within field sports: I know what it's like to be tarred with the same brush as those who are blatantly criminal in their actions, at the same time as feeling angry at our loss of freedom due to the ban. Whichever way you look at it, lurchers have been traditionally ostracised by the more 'main stream' sporting factions, but this is one instance which needs answering as bluntly as possible given the constrictions of the publication. treat people the way they treat you! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stabba 10,745 Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 what does people exspect with farmers getting ran over etc.............. Maybe an article on how not all dog lads are criminals and those that are only represent a tiny unwanted minority, the same minority you'd find attracted to any "hobby". Coming right up! I've been working on this in my head for the last few weeks, wondering how best to word a retaliatory article without alienating anyone at all: feckin' impossible really! Ever the diplomat ,I have been finding it hard to say what I want without downright attacking certain factions within field sports: I know what it's like to be tarred with the same brush as those who are blatantly criminal in their actions, at the same time as feeling angry at our loss of freedom due to the ban. Whichever way you look at it, lurchers have been traditionally ostracised by the more 'main stream' sporting factions, but this is one instance which needs answering as bluntly as possible given the constrictions of the publication. So will you still write for said paper and take their money despite knowing they are blatantly in the wrong in their assumptions of running dog men/women?? Or will you cast that aside and carry on as normal?? Genuine question. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Mears 272 Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 lads if you dont like it dont buy it....its really that simple. but one thing is for sure YOU aint helping by slagging our "own kind" off. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stewie 3,387 Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 lads if you dont like it dont buy it....its really that simple. but one thing is for sure YOU aint helping by slagging our "own kind" off. Lol ironic quote there!! How do you work that out then?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stewie 3,387 Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 what does people exspect with farmers getting ran over etc.............. Maybe an article on how not all dog lads are criminals and those that are only represent a tiny unwanted minority, the same minority you'd find attracted to any "hobby". Coming right up! I've been working on this in my head for the last few weeks, wondering how best to word a retaliatory article without alienating anyone at all: feckin' impossible really! Ever the diplomat ,I have been finding it hard to say what I want without downright attacking certain factions within field sports: I know what it's like to be tarred with the same brush as those who are blatantly criminal in their actions, at the same time as feeling angry at our loss of freedom due to the ban. Whichever way you look at it, lurchers have been traditionally ostracised by the more 'main stream' sporting factions, but this is one instance which needs answering as bluntly as possible given the constrictions of the publication. So will you still write for said paper and take their money despite knowing they are blatantly in the wrong in their assumptions of running dog men/women?? Or will you cast that aside and carry on as normal?? Genuine question. Course she will lol gotta keep the money rolling in and the masses happy!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.