whippet 99 2,613 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 imo they have to do both sides of the story , because that would look like they tolerate poaching if they didnt.....i agree with what people are saying , but surely there doing it to try and protect dog folk as much as it makes it look bad for dog men....................i think you have to be level headed in a public paper who wants poachers on there permission = no one we all know the truth behind the bull shite,.........what goes in there, but unless your poaching i cant see why you have a problem with it lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dytkos 17,793 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Have the articles by dances/123456/SHHunter been in yet? Cheers, D. PS What's happened to him, too busy writing? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
j1985 1,983 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 imo they have to do both sides of the story , because that would look like they tolerate poaching if they didnt.....i agree with what people are saying , but surely there doing it to try and protect dog folk as much as it makes it look bad for dog men....................i think you have to be level headed in a public paper who wants poachers on there permission = no one we all know the truth behind the bull shite,.........what goes in there, but unless your poaching i cant see why you have a problem with it lol They don't have to run shit like that at all, saying all poachers are violent, dangerous criminals is ok is it ? Making everyday people that read that run screaming in fear for their lives at the sight of a man with a lurcher/terrier lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
whippet 99 2,613 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 imo they have to do both sides of the story , because that would look like they tolerate poaching if they didnt.....i agree with what people are saying , but surely there doing it to try and protect dog folk as much as it makes it look bad for dog men....................i think you have to be level headed in a public paper who wants poachers on there permission = no one we all know the truth behind the bull shite,.........what goes in there, but unless your poaching i cant see why you have a problem with it lol They don't have to run shit like that at all, saying all poachers are violent, dangerous criminals is ok is it ? Making everyday people that read that run screaming in fear for their lives at the sight of a man with a lurcher/terrier lol no your right , that is bad, i use to read it but havent for a while ...............im not saying that is right at all, just saying they had to write about it but putting shite like that is unexceptable,...... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
R.A.W 1,987 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 used to love having a good read but haven't read one for a long time. thank fork after the shite they have been printing. and if theres any dog men on here that has never poached. not even a quick flick on the next field. THEY ARE TELLING PORK PIES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
stewie 3,387 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 i wonder if darcy still be "sharing his expertise" with the lurcher world through its pages............ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
trooperman 73 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 bought the country mans this week, i was going to take it back and ask for my money back what a load of crap ??????????? should have a quick looksee before you bought it I do that lol have a wee browse see if its worth buying , most of the time I just flick through then move on to top shelf stuff top shelf is that all the shooting mags in WHSmith Quote Link to post Share on other sites
markja 51 Posted December 1, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 it should be boycotted i wont buy it again Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DIDO.1 22,731 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 That poachers watch bit got me the other day. Especially this bit Load of shit Might sign up just to get the pocket book so I know how to deal with such dangerous, violent criminals lol has that dog got a white coursing collar on? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wolfie 106 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 That poachers watch bit got me the other day. Especially this bit Load of shit Might sign up just to get the pocket book so I know how to deal with such dangerous, violent criminals lol has that dog got a white coursing collar on? ya looks like a white collar Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ideation 8,216 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Thats the thing, they are trying to link all hare coursing with poaching and all poaching with violent criminals Hence - all hare coursing involves violent criminals. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 Thats the thing, they are trying to link all hare coursing with poaching and all poaching with violent criminals Hence - all hare coursing involves violent criminals. convince the public to pick up the phone and their job gets done for them Quote Link to post Share on other sites
markja 51 Posted December 1, 2012 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 they think everyone with a lurcher and lamp or a terrier and spade are violent thugs good job we know better Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Simoman 110 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 That ray charles is the one who thinks "that deer can die from the stress of being chased" !!! Proper wanker. Whether they can or can't, I'm really genuinely surprised that article was in the CMW, seems a little 2 faced when staff from the paper spend all summer standing around at shows pretending to be on the same side. In fact, it fcking stinks that they of all people KNOW that not even a tiny percentage of "poachers" are criminals to be feared, yet they run an article saying exactly that. It's all about the money, big surprise! Maybe next summer, they'll find a cold reception from those who have supported them in the past, an article like that shows their true colours as far as I'm concerned, who'd want to write for/advertise/buy a paper that supports those who seek to do them harm? I can't understand why anyone would want to contribute as by there own admission artlcles are watered down and not even pre-ban stuff is wanted, is it just for the money??? Of course SOME lads who stray are wrong un's, so are people who speed, does Top Gear magazine run ad's stating all motorists are scum? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 46,789 Posted December 1, 2012 Report Share Posted December 1, 2012 imo they have to do both sides of the story , because that would look like they tolerate poaching if they didnt.....i agree with what people are saying , but surely there doing it to try and protect dog folk as much as it makes it look bad for dog men....................i think you have to be level headed in a public paper who wants poachers on there permission = no one we all know the truth behind the bull shite,.........what goes in there, but unless your poaching i cant see why you have a problem with it lol Anyone who jumps the odd fence to have a run is poaching.......don't make them bad people does it........no exactly Don Corleone stuff a lad catching a few rabbits or knocking over the odd fox or roe. Protect dog folk my arse, it's about arse licking the authority's........that's why the BASC always want to come up with some " code of practice" or the other instead of saying " no bollocks, we ain't all criminals .....we hunt, get over it" 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.