BSA R!0 Warning

[pianoman 3,587]

There's the frequently quoted phone number.

 

0781 503 1934

 

Anyone care to ring it and "talk" to this maggot ?

[Bendover 67]

No answer, too early to scam?

[PIL 7]

Anyone looking for Steve Graham try tapping a few doors in

Pilley lane

Cheltenham

Gloucester

GL53

 

He may well frequent The Wheatsheaf as its been said he likes to play darts .

Just make sure it's him before you start tickling him .lol

[davyt63 1,845]

this is why i suggested a trusted list !

it could be a sticky at the top of every section,this way you put up who you have had a good deal with 100%,then at least members can have a look if the person they intend on dealing with ,is on it!

then if so they can make there own mind up,if they would like to deal with them.

 

but F2F is the way to go if you are dealing/selling on any forum, especially with your hard earn't cash!!!

[secretagentmole 1,701]

Anybody know Davids current address? Thanks Pil, I have stored the info!

[Strong Stuff 2,171]

this is why i suggested a trusted list !

it could be a sticky at the top of every section,this way you put up who you have had a good deal with 100%,then at least members can have a look if the person they intend on dealing with ,is on it!

then if so they can make there own mind up,if they would like to deal with them.

 

but F2F is the way to go if you are dealing/selling on any forum, especially with your hard earn't cash!!!

 

A trusted list?

 

But you were one of those defending SG when he started robbing lads on here!

 

So, you were either vouching for him without knowing he was trustworthy (in which case what is the point of a list? Trusted by who?? You??? As if your word would count for anything bearing in mind you said SG was ok)

Or, you did know him and thought he was decent, again which completely negates the need for any list, just because he didn't rob one person doesn't mean he won't rob the next.

 

Personally, my view is that if you are daft enough to send someone you don't know personally hundreds of pounds for an item you haven't actually seen then you can't whine when you get robbed!

 

Trust is earned.

[PIL 7]

Anybody know Davids current address? Thanks Pil, I have stored the info!

I think if you tickled Steve enough he might just tell you :laugh:

The address if proven to be correct could also be put up on the fishing forums as I heard they are great at tickling , must be all in the hand movement.

[PIL 7]

this is why i suggested a trusted list !

it could be a sticky at the top of every section,this way you put up who you have had a good deal with 100%,then at least members can have a look if the person they intend on dealing with ,is on it!

then if so they can make there own mind up,if they would like to deal with them.

 

but F2F is the way to go if you are dealing/selling on any forum, especially with your hard earn't cash!!!

 

A trusted list?

 

But you were one of those defending SG when he started robbing lads on here!

 

So, you were either vouching for him without knowing he was trustworthy (in which case what is the point of a list? Trusted by who?? You??? As if your word would count for anything bearing in mind you said SG was ok)

Or, you did know him and thought he was decent, again which completely negates the need for any list, just because he didn't rob one person doesn't mean he won't rob the next.

 

Personally, my view is that if you are daft enough to send someone you don't know personally hundreds of pounds for an item you haven't actually seen then you can't whine when you get robbed!

 

Trust is earned.

SS whilst I see what your saying and agree with the last part of your post, the first part ( though true) sounds like a dig and for that I think your a kunt of the highest order . Davy would not of knowingly vouched for such a scumbag let alone send him a rifle if he didn't think he he was worthy of his trust. The difference with Steve Graham is he gains your trust then fecks you with it, kunt.

The trusted list would only be a guild as like you say f2f is best for both partys.

 

Just my thoughts and if theses sentiments are not the case then I apologise.

 

Regards

[Strong Stuff 2,171]

this is why i suggested a trusted list !

it could be a sticky at the top of every section,this way you put up who you have had a good deal with 100%,then at least members can have a look if the person they intend on dealing with ,is on it!

then if so they can make there own mind up,if they would like to deal with them.

 

but F2F is the way to go if you are dealing/selling on any forum, especially with your hard earn't cash!!!

 

A trusted list?

 

But you were one of those defending SG when he started robbing lads on here!

 

So, you were either vouching for him without knowing he was trustworthy (in which case what is the point of a list? Trusted by who?? You??? As if your word would count for anything bearing in mind you said SG was ok)

Or, you did know him and thought he was decent, again which completely negates the need for any list, just because he didn't rob one person doesn't mean he won't rob the next.

 

Personally, my view is that if you are daft enough to send someone you don't know personally hundreds of pounds for an item you haven't actually seen then you can't whine when you get robbed!

 

Trust is earned.

SS whilst I see what your saying and agree with the last part of your post, the first part ( though true) sounds like a dig and for that I think your a kunt of the highest order . Davy would not of knowingly vouched for such a scumbag let alone send him a rifle if he didn't think he he was worthy of his trust. The difference with Steve Graham is he gains your trust then fecks you with it, kunt.

The trusted list would only be a guild as like you say f2f is best for both partys.

 

Just my thoughts and if theses sentiments are not the case then I apologise.

 

Regards

 

That's nice, thanks for that.

 

 

For the record, and maybe, gobshite you should have actually checked first.....

 

When it all first started coming out about the thief, Big Balls Davy did vouch for him, and threatened me because I dared to have a different opinion, he later apologised saying he'd had too much wine that night.

 

So ......... how does that make you feel? Being wrong and calling me a Kunt, all in one post.

 

Mind you don't choke on Davy's cock now.

[PIL 7]

this is why i suggested a trusted list !

it could be a sticky at the top of every section,this way you put up who you have had a good deal with 100%,then at least members can have a look if the person they intend on dealing with ,is on it!

then if so they can make there own mind up,if they would like to deal with them.

 

but F2F is the way to go if you are dealing/selling on any forum, especially with your hard earn't cash!!!

 

A trusted list?

 

But you were one of those defending SG when he started robbing lads on here!

 

So, you were either vouching for him without knowing he was trustworthy (in which case what is the point of a list? Trusted by who?? You??? As if your word would count for anything bearing in mind you said SG was ok)

Or, you did know him and thought he was decent, again which completely negates the need for any list, just because he didn't rob one person doesn't mean he won't rob the next.

 

Personally, my view is that if you are daft enough to send someone you don't know personally hundreds of pounds for an item you haven't actually seen then you can't whine when you get robbed!

 

Trust is earned.

SS whilst I see what your saying and agree with the last part of your post, the first part ( though true) sounds like a dig and for that I think your a kunt of the highest order . Davy would not of knowingly vouched for such a scumbag let alone send him a rifle if he didn't think he he was worthy of his trust. The difference with Steve Graham is he gains your trust then fecks you with it, kunt.

The trusted list would only be a guild as like you say f2f is best for both partys.

 

Just my thoughts and if theses sentiments are not the case then I apologise.

 

Regards

 

That's nice, thanks for that.

 

 

For the record, and maybe, gobshite you should have actually checked first.....

 

When it all first started coming out about the thief, Big Balls Davy did vouch for him, and threatened me because I dared to have a different opinion, he later apologised saying he'd had too much wine that night.

 

So ......... how does that make you feel? Being wrong and calling me a Kunt, all in one post.

 

Mind you don't choke on Davy's cock now.

I don't swing that way mate ! But you crack on . lol

I only wrote as to how it came across and the apology was there if that was not the way it was intended

[Strong Stuff 2,171]

this is why i suggested a trusted list !

it could be a sticky at the top of every section,this way you put up who you have had a good deal with 100%,then at least members can have a look if the person they intend on dealing with ,is on it!

then if so they can make there own mind up,if they would like to deal with them.

 

but F2F is the way to go if you are dealing/selling on any forum, especially with your hard earn't cash!!!

 

A trusted list?

 

But you were one of those defending SG when he started robbing lads on here!

 

So, you were either vouching for him without knowing he was trustworthy (in which case what is the point of a list? Trusted by who?? You??? As if your word would count for anything bearing in mind you said SG was ok)

Or, you did know him and thought he was decent, again which completely negates the need for any list, just because he didn't rob one person doesn't mean he won't rob the next.

 

Personally, my view is that if you are daft enough to send someone you don't know personally hundreds of pounds for an item you haven't actually seen then you can't whine when you get robbed!

 

Trust is earned.

SS whilst I see what your saying and agree with the last part of your post, the first part ( though true) sounds like a dig and for that I think your a kunt of the highest order . Davy would not of knowingly vouched for such a scumbag let alone send him a rifle if he didn't think he he was worthy of his trust. The difference with Steve Graham is he gains your trust then fecks you with it, kunt.

The trusted list would only be a guild as like you say f2f is best for both partys.

 

Just my thoughts and if theses sentiments are not the case then I apologise.

 

Regards

 

That's nice, thanks for that.

 

 

For the record, and maybe, gobshite you should have actually checked first.....

 

When it all first started coming out about the thief, Big Balls Davy did vouch for him, and threatened me because I dared to have a different opinion, he later apologised saying he'd had too much wine that night.

 

So ......... how does that make you feel? Being wrong and calling me a Kunt, all in one post.

 

Mind you don't choke on Davy's cock now.

I don't swing that way mate ! But you crack on . lol

I only wrote as to how it came across and the apology was there if that was not the way it was intended

 

Shitting it here.

[PIL 7]

this is why i suggested a trusted list !

it could be a sticky at the top of every section,this way you put up who you have had a good deal with 100%,then at least members can have a look if the person they intend on dealing with ,is on it!

then if so they can make there own mind up,if they would like to deal with them.

 

but F2F is the way to go if you are dealing/selling on any forum, especially with your hard earn't cash!!!

 

A trusted list?

 

But you were one of those defending SG when he started robbing lads on here!

 

So, you were either vouching for him without knowing he was trustworthy (in which case what is the point of a list? Trusted by who?? You??? As if your word would count for anything bearing in mind you said SG was ok)

Or, you did know him and thought he was decent, again which completely negates the need for any list, just because he didn't rob one person doesn't mean he won't rob the next.

 

Personally, my view is that if you are daft enough to send someone you don't know personally hundreds of pounds for an item you haven't actually seen then you can't whine when you get robbed!

 

Trust is earned.

SS whilst I see what your saying and agree with the last part of your post, the first part ( though true) sounds like a dig and for that I think your a kunt of the highest order . Davy would not of knowingly vouched for such a scumbag let alone send him a rifle if he didn't think he he was worthy of his trust. The difference with Steve Graham is he gains your trust then fecks you with it, kunt.

The trusted list would only be a guild as like you say f2f is best for both partys.

 

Just my thoughts and if theses sentiments are not the case then I apologise.

 

Regards

 

That's nice, thanks for that.

 

 

For the record, and maybe, gobshite you should have actually checked first.....

 

When it all first started coming out about the thief, Big Balls Davy did vouch for him, and threatened me because I dared to have a different opinion, he later apologised saying he'd had too much wine that night.

 

So ......... how does that make you feel? Being wrong and calling me a Kunt, all in one post.

 

Mind you don't choke on Davy's cock now.

I don't swing that way mate ! But you crack on . lol

I only wrote as to how it came across and the apology was there if that was not the way it was intended

 

Shitting it here.

Why's that then ? I've not threatened you , why come out with a statement like that ?

Sometimes some people could fall out with themselves , Do you come in that category ??

Edited December 1, 2012 by PIL

[Strong Stuff 2,171]

this is why i suggested a trusted list !

it could be a sticky at the top of every section,this way you put up who you have had a good deal with 100%,then at least members can have a look if the person they intend on dealing with ,is on it!

then if so they can make there own mind up,if they would like to deal with them.

 

but F2F is the way to go if you are dealing/selling on any forum, especially with your hard earn't cash!!!

 

A trusted list?

 

But you were one of those defending SG when he started robbing lads on here!

 

So, you were either vouching for him without knowing he was trustworthy (in which case what is the point of a list? Trusted by who?? You??? As if your word would count for anything bearing in mind you said SG was ok)

Or, you did know him and thought he was decent, again which completely negates the need for any list, just because he didn't rob one person doesn't mean he won't rob the next.

 

Personally, my view is that if you are daft enough to send someone you don't know personally hundreds of pounds for an item you haven't actually seen then you can't whine when you get robbed!

 

Trust is earned.

SS whilst I see what your saying and agree with the last part of your post, the first part ( though true) sounds like a dig and for that I think your a kunt of the highest order . Davy would not of knowingly vouched for such a scumbag let alone send him a rifle if he didn't think he he was worthy of his trust. The difference with Steve Graham is he gains your trust then fecks you with it, kunt.

The trusted list would only be a guild as like you say f2f is best for both partys.

 

Just my thoughts and if theses sentiments are not the case then I apologise.

 

Regards

 

That's nice, thanks for that.

 

 

For the record, and maybe, gobshite you should have actually checked first.....

 

When it all first started coming out about the thief, Big Balls Davy did vouch for him, and threatened me because I dared to have a different opinion, he later apologised saying he'd had too much wine that night.

 

So ......... how does that make you feel? Being wrong and calling me a Kunt, all in one post.

 

Mind you don't choke on Davy's cock now.

I don't swing that way mate ! But you crack on . lol

I only wrote as to how it came across and the apology was there if that was not the way it was intended

 

Shitting it here.

Why's that then ? I've not threatened you , why come out with a statement like that ?

Sometimes some people cold fall out with themselves , Do you come in that category ??

 

No.

 

I just don't much like some blurt calling me a kunt, I'm funny like that.

[PIL 7]

this is why i suggested a trusted list !

it could be a sticky at the top of every section,this way you put up who you have had a good deal with 100%,then at least members can have a look if the person they intend on dealing with ,is on it!

then if so they can make there own mind up,if they would like to deal with them.

 

but F2F is the way to go if you are dealing/selling on any forum, especially with your hard earn't cash!!!

 

A trusted list?

 

But you were one of those defending SG when he started robbing lads on here!

 

So, you were either vouching for him without knowing he was trustworthy (in which case what is the point of a list? Trusted by who?? You??? As if your word would count for anything bearing in mind you said SG was ok)

Or, you did know him and thought he was decent, again which completely negates the need for any list, just because he didn't rob one person doesn't mean he won't rob the next.

 

Personally, my view is that if you are daft enough to send someone you don't know personally hundreds of pounds for an item you haven't actually seen then you can't whine when you get robbed!

 

Trust is earned.

SS whilst I see what your saying and agree with the last part of your post, the first part ( though true) sounds like a dig and for that I think your a kunt of the highest order . Davy would not of knowingly vouched for such a scumbag let alone send him a rifle if he didn't think he he was worthy of his trust. The difference with Steve Graham is he gains your trust then fecks you with it, kunt.

The trusted list would only be a guild as like you say f2f is best for both partys.

 

Just my thoughts and if theses sentiments are not the case then I apologise.

 

Regards

 

That's nice, thanks for that.

 

 

For the record, and maybe, gobshite you should have actually checked first.....

 

When it all first started coming out about the thief, Big Balls Davy did vouch for him, and threatened me because I dared to have a different opinion, he later apologised saying he'd had too much wine that night.

 

So ......... how does that make you feel? Being wrong and calling me a Kunt, all in one post.

 

Mind you don't choke on Davy's cock now.

I don't swing that way mate ! But you crack on . lol

I only wrote as to how it came across and the apology was there if that was not the way it was intended

 

Shitting it here.

Why's that then ? I've not threatened you , why come out with a statement like that ?

Sometimes some people cold fall out with themselves , Do you come in that category ??

 

No.

 

I just don't much like some blurt calling me a kunt, I'm funny like that.

look I respect you and from reading various topics you are respected by many members on here , but when you take a dig at one of my mates for making an honest post and making his look a dick with no apology for the fact then yes that makes you a kunt .

[lighthunter 81]

BLOODY HELL [PIL] were did that come from,dragging up old news[yesterdays fish and chip rappers]aint doing anyone no favours.bye getting into a slagging match with members,i think you are just playing into the [scumbags GREAHAMS] hands.they must be watching this post'and enjoying it,WE all no what they are like,and i no they get under our skin',leave it to MOLE to do the diggin on the brothers grim,[and a good job he does].i just dont want to see this thread get out of hand buddy,thats just my opinion.we should all be looking out for each other,NOT trying to FALL out with each other. .does that make sense???.