walshie 2,804 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 I think the dirty savages always were that low. No sinking involved. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pedwar 320 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 I think the dirty savages always were that low. No sinking involved. Very true, a few years ago in 1 of those shit-hole countries, I think Saudi Arabia, the police locked the doors of a burning school so the girl pupils inside couldnt get out because they didnt have thier headscarves on, they burned to death Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 48,384 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 What I find strange is that we have a blue f*****g fit when someone says they want to inpose "sharia law" in the west BUT we think nothing of rocking into these countries and trying to make them take on our western values! Leave all these arabs, indians, africans alone and let em get on with it, stop sending our best and brightest to die in these shitholes......they dont want us, they dont need us and they aint gonna change.......and whats more, why should they? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bob.243 9,235 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 They're lower than a snakes hardon! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 What I find strange is that we have a blue f*****g fit when someone says they want to inpose "sharia law" in the west BUT we think nothing of rocking into these countries and trying to make them take on our western values! Leave all these arabs, indians, africans alone and let em get on with it, stop sending our best and brightest to die in these shitholes......they dont want us, they dont need us and they aint gonna change.......and whats more, why should they? Because you can't leave them alone weve been there and tried that. When you do they start flying airliners into buildings and setting off explosions in underground stations or bombing Western Embassy's 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 48,384 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 What I find strange is that we have a blue f*****g fit when someone says they want to inpose "sharia law" in the west BUT we think nothing of rocking into these countries and trying to make them take on our western values! Leave all these arabs, indians, africans alone and let em get on with it, stop sending our best and brightest to die in these shitholes......they dont want us, they dont need us and they aint gonna change.......and whats more, why should they? Because you can't leave them alone weve been there and tried that. When you do they start flying airliners into buildings and setting off explosions in underground stations or bombing Western Embassy's Fair point matey, but it rather begs the question of why aint we invading Pakistan then? Its gone from "removing the taliban" because they were a threat to security and possibly harbouring Bin Laden to "freeing the Afghan people and improving their lives" I watched a thing the other day about a group of soldiers in Afghan, the strategy from command was "go out and walk around until someone shoots you or shoots at you".....they could see some Taliban laying in a murder hole 50 meters away but could not open fire because they hadnt been fired on!!......they got up, walked 2 yards and bang!!!, the blokes across they way set off 2 IEDs and 2 lads got blown up (thankfully unharmed) If we are gonna fight a war for security reasons then fair enough, lets get in there, unleash our military men and flatten the f*****g place until they behave. What turns my guts is sending our sons and daughters to get used as target practice by these f*****g savages so some government minister can say he is "humane and caring and inproving peoples lives" If its a war, then lets call it a war, give some clear military objectives and let the proffesionals get on with it without one arm tied behind their back..........if its not a war, then our people have no business being in harms way. jmho 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 You don't need to look at sharia law to see how brutal they are. It's in thier genes. Savages plain and simple. They enjoy living in the dark ages. We should help them with that, and bomb the c**ts back into the Stone Age. solved Quote Link to post Share on other sites
desertbred 5,490 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 (edited) The young Girl was brutally attacked by the Taliabn and they should be extErminated but reality is the Taliban were financed by the American CIA to fight against the Russian invasion of Afghanistan the money was provided in 1985 to General ZIA-ul Haq who was President of Pakistan at that time and the funds went to the ISI to form the Taliban. Ossama Bin Ladens family also gained there wealth from American And British oil companies. Saddam Hussain was put in charge of Iraq by the British when he was a student leader so clean the western goverments up before trying to police the world. Edited October 10, 2012 by desertbred Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rob190364 2,594 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 You don't need to look at sharia law to see how brutal they are. It's in thier genes. Savages plain and simple. They enjoy living in the dark ages. We should help them with that, and bomb the c**ts back into the Stone Age. solved Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 What I find strange is that we have a blue f*****g fit when someone says they want to inpose "sharia law" in the west BUT we think nothing of rocking into these countries and trying to make them take on our western values! Leave all these arabs, indians, africans alone and let em get on with it, stop sending our best and brightest to die in these shitholes......they dont want us, they dont need us and they aint gonna change.......and whats more, why should they? Because you can't leave them alone weve been there and tried that. When you do they start flying airliners into buildings and setting off explosions in underground stations or bombing Western Embassy's Fair point matey, but it rather begs the question of why aint we invading Pakistan then? Its gone from "removing the taliban" because they were a threat to security and possibly harbouring Bin Laden to "freeing the Afghan people and improving their lives" I watched a thing the other day about a group of soldiers in Afghan, the strategy from command was "go out and walk around until someone shoots you or shoots at you".....they could see some Taliban laying in a murder hole 50 meters away but could not open fire because they hadnt been fired on!!......they got up, walked 2 yards and bang!!!, the blokes across they way set off 2 IEDs and 2 lads got blown up (thankfully unharmed) If we are gonna fight a war for security reasons then fair enough, lets get in there, unleash our military men and flatten the f*****g place until they behave. What turns my guts is sending our sons and daughters to get used as target practice by these f*****g savages so some government minister can say he is "humane and caring and inproving peoples lives" If its a war, then lets call it a war, give some clear military objectives and let the proffesionals get on with it without one arm tied behind their back..........if its not a war, then our people have no business being in harms way. jmho Wilf got to agree with you Pakistan is a country trying desperately to mix in Western civilised society with the majority of its population still having a medieval mentality. How they got nukes is beyond me more worryingly how they can maintain them in the future is the point, it really is the equivalent of giving a Neanderthal man a flame thrower. I haven't met a Pakistani I could trust yet, I have been lied to so many times and double crossed in business it's unbelievable. it is within their culture to lie to any westerner with the conviction and justification that we are infidels and they have the moral superiority. In my experience Indians on the other hand are a totally different kettle of fish they have respect and seem to know the difference of lies and truth, right and wrong. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOMO 27,449 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 Needs to be bigger than that paulus, hole of north Africa as well Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 Needs to be bigger than that paulus, hole of north Africa as well that would keep them quiet for a good few years Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bezza Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 What I find strange is that we have a blue f*****g fit when someone says they want to inpose "sharia law" in the west BUT we think nothing of rocking into these countries and trying to make them take on our western values! Leave all these arabs, indians, africans alone and let em get on with it, stop sending our best and brightest to die in these shitholes......they dont want us, they dont need us and they aint gonna change.......and whats more, why should they? Because you can't leave them alone weve been there and tried that. When you do they start flying airliners into buildings and setting off explosions in underground stations or bombing Western Embassy's Fair point matey, but it rather begs the question of why aint we invading Pakistan then? Its gone from "removing the taliban" because they were a threat to security and possibly harbouring Bin Laden to "freeing the Afghan people and improving their lives" I watched a thing the other day about a group of soldiers in Afghan, the strategy from command was "go out and walk around until someone shoots you or shoots at you".....they could see some Taliban laying in a murder hole 50 meters away but could not open fire because they hadnt been fired on!!......they got up, walked 2 yards and bang!!!, the blokes across they way set off 2 IEDs and 2 lads got blown up (thankfully unharmed) If we are gonna fight a war for security reasons then fair enough, lets get in there, unleash our military men and flatten the f*****g place until they behave. What turns my guts is sending our sons and daughters to get used as target practice by these f*****g savages so some government minister can say he is "humane and caring and inproving peoples lives" If its a war, then lets call it a war, give some clear military objectives and let the proffesionals get on with it without one arm tied behind their back..........if its not a war, then our people have no business being in harms way. jmho I'm gobsmacked. Incredulous. I actually agree with you Wilf. First and probably last time. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
paulus 26 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 What I find strange is that we have a blue f*****g fit when someone says they want to inpose "sharia law" in the west BUT we think nothing of rocking into these countries and trying to make them take on our western values! Leave all these arabs, indians, africans alone and let em get on with it, stop sending our best and brightest to die in these shitholes......they dont want us, they dont need us and they aint gonna change.......and whats more, why should they? Because you can't leave them alone weve been there and tried that. When you do they start flying airliners into buildings and setting off explosions in underground stations or bombing Western Embassy's Fair point matey, but it rather begs the question of why aint we invading Pakistan then? Its gone from "removing the taliban" because they were a threat to security and possibly harbouring Bin Laden to "freeing the Afghan people and improving their lives" I watched a thing the other day about a group of soldiers in Afghan, the strategy from command was "go out and walk around until someone shoots you or shoots at you".....they could see some Taliban laying in a murder hole 50 meters away but could not open fire because they hadnt been fired on!!......they got up, walked 2 yards and bang!!!, the blokes across they way set off 2 IEDs and 2 lads got blown up (thankfully unharmed) If we are gonna fight a war for security reasons then fair enough, lets get in there, unleash our military men and flatten the f*****g place until they behave. What turns my guts is sending our sons and daughters to get used as target practice by these f*****g savages so some government minister can say he is "humane and caring and inproving peoples lives" If its a war, then lets call it a war, give some clear military objectives and let the proffesionals get on with it without one arm tied behind their back..........if its not a war, then our people have no business being in harms way. jmho I'm gobsmacked. Incredulous. I actually agree with you Wilf. First and probably last time. why do you think there now questioning the use of drones best weopen ever invented if you ask me, pull our lads home and stick a few ships there operatining tens of 1000`s of the fookers its the way forward IED`S dont work againt drones Quote Link to post Share on other sites
desertbred 5,490 Posted October 10, 2012 Report Share Posted October 10, 2012 (edited) What I find strange is that we have a blue f*****g fit when someone says they want to inpose "sharia law" in the west BUT we think nothing of rocking into these countries and trying to make them take on our western values! Leave all these arabs, indians, africans alone and let em get on with it, stop sending our best and brightest to die in these shitholes......they dont want us, they dont need us and they aint gonna change.......and whats more, why should they? Because you can't leave them alone weve been there and tried that. When you do they start flying airliners into buildings and setting off explosions in underground stations or bombing Western Embassy's Fair point matey, but it rather begs the question of why aint we invading Pakistan then? Its gone from "removing the taliban" because they were a threat to security and possibly harbouring Bin Laden to "freeing the Afghan people and improving their lives" I watched a thing the other day about a group of soldiers in Afghan, the strategy from command was "go out and walk around until someone shoots you or shoots at you".....they could see some Taliban laying in a murder hole 50 meters away but could not open fire because they hadnt been fired on!!......they got up, walked 2 yards and bang!!!, the blokes across they way set off 2 IEDs and 2 lads got blown up (thankfully unharmed) If we are gonna fight a war for security reasons then fair enough, lets get in there, unleash our military men and flatten the f*****g place until they behave. What turns my guts is sending our sons and daughters to get used as target practice by these f*****g savages so some government minister can say he is "humane and caring and inproving peoples lives" If its a war, then lets call it a war, give some clear military objectives and let the proffesionals get on with it without one arm tied behind their back..........if its not a war, then our people have no business being in harms way. jmho I'm gobsmacked. Incredulous. I actually agree with you Wilf. First and probably last time. why do you think there now questioning the use of drones best weopen ever invented if you ask me, pull our lads home and stick a few ships there operatining tens of 1000`s of the fookers its the way forward IED`S dont work againt drones why are the troops there at all? could it be the yanks and British want the untapped natural resources of AFGHANISTAN some one mentioned dis honesty the f*****g masters are the British look at ther bankers, look at Hillsborough , look at the paper seller in London look at sir jimmy saville Edited October 10, 2012 by desertbred Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.