Jump to content

RSPCA at it again


Recommended Posts

looks like Attenborough has also got involved :huh: , as i understand it there plan is to cull up to 3000 badgers over a 4 year period , if the defra figures are correct & 18,000 head of cattle were destroyed over a 5 month period because they were reactors then 3000 over 4 years isnt exactly going to make a dent in the badger population .

 

I could understand these people if they had given the go ahead to a mass cull of the '' total'' population , if taking the 3000 over the 4 year period make s a difference in highly populated areas & reduces the spread of bovine TB then it quite rightly it should go ahead :thumbs:

 

http://www.fwi.co.uk/Articles/11/09/2012/135103/TV39s-David-Attenborough-joins-badger-cull-opposition.htm

Surpised to see him comment on this. :yes: I saw him on the One show showing a great deal of indifference towards hunting deer with dogs when Adrian Chiles tried to get him to condemn it..
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

There roll is to prevent '' cruelty'' , I dont understand what is '' cruel'' in regards to a very small select few areas where the cull is most needed , to be honest they can lobby supermarkets to cha

There trying to use there clout to scare the financial sector, just like they did over the goose cull on Windermere,they have too much power, and are trying to hold the farmers and land owning public

what really irritates me about this whole '' RSPCA interference '' is if supermarkets do agree to label all there milk products with '' badger friendly'' it implies that dairy farming in some way ''

why not cull the cows and milk the badgers ? the production of food is about the only thing this country manufactures now. so should we get rid of all the farms and turn the farm land into picnic areas .Then we could buy our food from other countys that produce food by lets say more relaxed methords this way the rspca could claim to have saved all the country sides fluffy creatures from all the bad men who call themselfs farmers and help with the conscience of the minority of people who bury there heads in the sand and refuse to accept the facts that animals are used in the production of food. the welfare of farm stock should be a priority because THE MAJORITY (are not vegies ) EAT ANIMALS.

Edited by hily
Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like Attenborough has also got involved :huh: , as i understand it there plan is to cull up to 3000 badgers over a 4 year period , if the defra figures are correct & 18,000 head of cattle were destroyed over a 5 month period because they were reactors then 3000 over 4 years isnt exactly going to make a dent in the badger population .

 

I could understand these people if they had given the go ahead to a mass cull of the '' total'' population , if taking the 3000 over the 4 year period make s a difference in highly populated areas & reduces the spread of bovine TB then it quite rightly it should go ahead :thumbs:

 

http://www.fwi.co.uk...-opposition.htm

Surpised to see him comment on this. :yes: I saw him on the One show showing a great deal of indifference towards hunting deer with dogs when Adrian Chiles tried to get him to condemn it..

 

So was I Mal , cant say I have seen his name connected to '' Anti'' type propaganda in the past , but i will have a poke about & see if i cant find anything along them lines :thumbs:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the rspca & the league against cruel sports had to run the farms & livestock , would their opinion change ?

 

LACS are just paid agitators , they couldnt care less about badgers , cattle or anything else :thumbs:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Utter madness yet again the world is getting worse!

I agree with all the comments and yes you are right Kay and when the League tried to keep Deer at Barransdown loads had to be put down because they failed to look after them properly, there is a BBC show about it on youtube just type in League Against Cruel Sports sanctuary exposé and anyone can view it if they wish.

Edited by CountryBumpkin1986
Link to post
Share on other sites

The name Amanda King keeps cropping up in all the news stuff I am finding, she is seemingly a member of a group called '' speak'' she was one of the looneys who had an injunction taken out on her for the terrible way gladys hammonds family were treated regarding the disinterment of gladys hammonds grave some years ago & is described as a '' terrarist'' by the judge who read & handed out the injunctions

 

maybe the likes of may & the RSPCA may well begin to think this campaigning isnt the way to go if its attracting support of the likes of king a known sab as well as others like Ian pedler

 

There seemingly heavyweights in this type of intimidation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Utter madness yet again the world is getting worse!

I agree with all the comments and yes you are right Kay and when the League tried to keep Deer at Barransdown loads had to be put down because they failed to look after them properly, there is a BBC show about it on youtube just type in League Against Cruel Sports sanctuary exposé and anyone can view it if they wish.

 

I really wish I hadn't watched that, they are two faced, double standard, ignorant, arse holes. They are so hypocritical it's untrue.

 

The LACS spokesman just lies through his back teeth about TB on the estate. I don't use this word lightly but I really do hate these people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its time this goverment grew some bollocks and cameron used the parilment act to just lift the protection on badger s they don t need it there hardly an endangered species then impose hunting seasons on them like in france , job done

 

then implement a BATTER AN ANTI MONTH were you can batter any know anti free from prosecution , if only i ran the world , happy hunting top

Link to post
Share on other sites

The animal right fraternity hit a lot of different groups, hunters, shooters, fishermen, farmers, pharmaceuticals..... the list goes on. If we ALL united it's a war that would last a few weeks with 100% victory. It's never going to happen but collectively we hold a lot of weight.

 

So what would you do to try and unite EVERYONE? How come no one has every tried to do this in the past, or have they?

I would love to see all of us unite, it's what is needed without a doubt, unfortunately some areas of our sport hold themselves in higher regard, and look unfavourably on others, there are so many elements to our sport, with different back grounds and origins many different tears of society, I would love to see 1 team 1effort a balanced and professional effort people who would challenge the status quo, we can all go a lot further to help each others cause, proactively it would be interesting to set up a working party,to look into this but I don't know any multi millionaires prepared to back us,

 

f*****g boils my piss how shooters, farmers, anglers, keepers and dog men bicker between themselves. Ignorant of and helping the cause of their common enemies. Something like the BASC but with angling, dog mens, hunts, farmers / landowners and keepers support could be massive. Bigger than the RSPB, bigger than the ARSEPCA and with the ability to squash annoying runts like LACS, NWHSA, PETA and the Gun Control Network easily.

 

 

An organisation for all countrymen / fieldsports and farmers united that carried real political clout like the NRA in America. An organisation so big that the smarmy c**t Tony bLiar would have thought twice about his ill thought out hunting act. Knowing it would have got the backs up of over two million anglers and hundreds of thousands of hunts, dogmen, shooters and keepers at the same time.

 

The antis would have everything banned if they got their way. Coursing, terrierwork, falconry, ferreting, angling, stalking, game shooting and pest control. Some of the more mental antis want pet ownership and farming banned. Once they get one thing banned they won't go home and retire, the foolish naive anglers and shooters who didn't stand side by side with dogmen over the hunting act are idiots. As it is them who are next in line for the antis campaigns IF they get running dogs and terrier work completly outlawed.

 

United we stand

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the rspca & the league against cruel sports had to run the farms & livestock , would their opinion change ?

. No. Did you see. The way. The kept. Their. Deer. Herd.

No but it sounds like the point has already been proven , people in glass houses comes to mind !
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...