What a Lakeland should look like ?

[paulus 26]

Some cracking terriers dewi.

 

Was GTE banned.

yes not sure exactly why but as i said i am sure thephantomflanflinger can get in touch

[phantomflanflinger 24]

Paulus i asure you iam not gte he set up my account on one of his several pc's. and ipads lol any one who wants to get in touch with him pm me though ill pass the message on ,

[dixiefried 269]

WHATS HAPPENED TO ALL THE PICS ,,,CIG cards etc,, Cant see them ..just Letters

[Dead Eyes 681]

where was photo taken in snow is it up geoffery hill in longridge.

If you're from that way and used to keep Lakelands, did yours ever kill an alsation?

 

And did you briefly own a pure greyhound?

[Bosun11 537]

I've read and re-read this thred and as far as i'm concerned the only type I see or class as a Lakeland Terrier, working or not, are those dogs that are black an tan.

I don't care if it was born out of 100 years of black and tan breeding, nor born in Cumbria, if it ain't B&T, it ain't a Lakeland. Call it the feck whatever you want but thats the truth.

No different than the fact that if it ain't white, it ain't a Russell.... Simples!

 

Oh yer, sorry to piss on anyone's chips but there are some fine examples of working terriers on view on this thred, of all types and colours, thanks for sharing.

[dixiefried 269]

Colour

Black and tan, blue and tan, red, wheaten, red grizzle, liver, blue or black. Small tips of white on feet and chest undesirable but permissible. Mahogany or deep tan not typical.

- See more at: http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/services/public/breed/standard.aspx?id=3072#sthash.Dp5EFcfo.dpuf

Breed Standard For LAKELAND TERRIER..

Colour

Black and tan, blue and tan, red, wheaten, red grizzle, liver, blue or black. Small tips of white on feet and chest undesirable but permissible. Mahogany or deep tan not typical.

- See more at: http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/services/public/breed/standard.aspx?id=3072#sthash.Dp5EFcfo.dpuf

Colour..

B&T ,Blue & Tan,Red, Wheaten ,Red Grizzle,Liver,Blue or Black

Small tips of white on feet & chest.

Undesirable , but Permissible Mahogany or Deep Tan not Typical.

 

The Kennel Club..Doesn't Agree with you Bosun,you'll be glad to know

Colour

Black and tan, blue and tan, red, wheaten, red grizzle, liver, blue or black. Small tips of white on feet and chest undesirable but permissible. Mahogany or deep tan not typical.

- See more at: http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/services/public/breed/standard.aspx?id=3072#sthash.Dp5EFcfo.dpuf

Colour

Black and tan, blue and tan, red, wheaten, red grizzle, liver, blue or black. Small tips of white on feet and chest undesirable but permissible. Mahogany or deep tan not typical.

- See more at: http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/services/public/breed/standard.aspx?id=3072#sthash.Dp5EFcfo.dpuf

 

My comp Went MAD !! :laugh:

Edited June 26, 2014 by dixiefried

[Bosun11 537]

Dixie, i'm so sad that the Kennel Club, in all it's majesty, don't agree with me.... Not many do..!

 

But I know this, i've never, in 30 years looked at any terrier that ain't black an tan and called it a Lakie.... Seen a red an called it a red or fell, seen a chocolate and called it liver, as it used to be before the shecklel but should that colour have the title of its type..? Seen them whites and said they are all Russells and long should they be so.... Oh, an seen the blacks and called them whatever I was thinking at the time, Fell, Patterdale, fit to burn on occasion!

Riddle me this... As with the KC how often has a none B&T ever made a big show champion...?

We define type by what we see and colour is all....

[dixiefried 269]

Non B&T...can't Think of ONE ! The GENERIC ..LAKIELAND will always be seen as a Small Welsh

I Prefer the solid ,non B&T ..be Called a FELL....

The Man from Cockermouth ..AJ ..Would love a Black To Win A K.C.show..save him Going up against G.N. all the Time an get to Keep better Company ,get some Plebs at the Country Shows

[the_stig 6,614]

if its white and its come from black n tan parents its a white Lakeland

[AXUM 255]

https://www.(!64.56:886/photo.php?v=637097646301794

[toby63 1,236]

 

where was photo taken in snow is it up geoffery hill in longridge.

If you're from that way and used to keep Lakelands, did yours ever kill an alsation?

 

And did you briefly own a pure greyhound?

no pal my dog hasnt killed a dog and no havent had a greyhound .

[Bosun11 537]

https://www.(!64.56:886/photo.php?v=637097646301794

You found me....!

[shaaark 10,868]

Dixie, i'm so sad that the Kennel Club, in all it's majesty, don't agree with me.... Not many do..!

 

But I know this, i've never, in 30 years looked at any terrier that ain't black an tan and called it a Lakie.... Seen a red an called it a red or fell, seen a chocolate and called it liver, as it used to be before the shecklel but should that colour have the title of its type..? Seen them whites and said they are all Russells and long should they be so.... Oh, an seen the blacks and called them whatever I was thinking at the time, Fell, Patterdale, fit to burn on occasion!

Riddle me this... As with the KC how often has a none B&T ever made a big show champion...?

We define type by what we see and colour is all....

Without wishing to be contentious, wasn't russell's foundation bitch 'trump' mated to his father's black and tan terrier? A few black and tan russells about down my way years ago, a mate had a belting smooth black and tan russell dog pup, proper black and tan like a doberman, in 1978, same year as I got my russell bitch, also smooth but white with a tan head.

Neither were worked to fox, but were both really good ratting dogs and general good fun workers/bushers

Edited June 27, 2014 by shaaark

[dytkos 17,804]

I've read and re-read this thred and as far as i'm concerned the only type I see or class as a Lakeland Terrier, working or not, are those dogs that are black an tan.

I don't care if it was born out of 100 years of black and tan breeding, nor born in Cumbria, if it ain't B&T, it ain't a Lakeland. Call it the feck whatever you want but thats the truth.

No different than the fact that if it ain't white, it ain't a Russell.... Simples!

 

Oh yer, sorry to piss on anyone's chips but there are some fine examples of working terriers on view on this thred, of all types and colours, thanks for sharing.

 

Try telling that to Gary Middleton

 

Cheers, D.

[marshman 7,758]

I've read and re-read this thred and as far as i'm concerned the only type I see or class as a Lakeland Terrier, working or not, are those dogs that are black an tan.

I don't care if it was born out of 100 years of black and tan breeding, nor born in Cumbria, if it ain't B&T, it ain't a Lakeland. Call it the feck whatever you want but thats the truth.

No different than the fact that if it ain't white, it ain't a Russell.... Simples!

 

Oh yer, sorry to piss on anyone's chips but there are some fine examples of working terriers on view on this thred, of all types and colours, thanks for sharing.

sorry Bosun got to disagree you can't or shouldn't define a terrier by its " colour " . That's where show people go wrong by trying to define what a terrier should look like and what its colour should be. I know you know this already mate but for me a terrier should only be defined by its work !