Jump to content

Which cross has the most litter wastage.


Guest bezza

Recommended Posts

I've seen some comical and some monstrous looking lurchers that just happened to inherit the wrong set of genes. For example a friend has a wheaten/grey which is a dead ringer for Greyfriars Bobby, runs like the latter too. I've seen some ripped bullcrosses which would struggle to catch a crisp packet in the wind.

I had a collie/grey which was racy enough but inherited the temperament of a collie, and a wired- to- the-moon, hyper collie at that. It was super sensitive and would bolt for home if she heard a firework, jet engine or a bolt of lightning. Not easy to keep your temper when you've isolated an easy run on the lamp and your lurcher goes awol.

Seriously which crosses are prone to a lot of litter wastage, or are all crosses equally susceptible to it?

Keep it light lads, no wars or breed blindness.

Edited by bezza
Link to post

It always makes me smile when someone posts the question what is such and such cross like? The answer is they are all different, sometimes in looks and sometimes in temperament . A lot will depend on the cross's early socialisation. A pup confined to a run will be a very different dog to one that is exposed to lots of different experiences.

I'm not sure I go along with the worker to worker commandment either. There are lots of people who have chosen not to work whose parents worked all their days :laugh: I think genetic inheritance is more important. Hancock's dogs have their critics but he would not be in business after all these years if a high percentage of his dogs failed to please their owners. Yet very few, if any of his breeding dogs work.

Edited by bezza
  • Like 2
Link to post

had a bitch a few years ago bred from two very decent "bitza" lurchers, both big strong racey dogs, and she ended up 20"tts and 42lb. looked like a beddy cross collie with a few extra muscles. made a decent ferret dog but NOT what you would have wanted from the two parents. i thi k the more diferent breeds in the mix, the less predictable and more variation in the litter.

 

but of course, a lot of dogs classed as wastage still have a use , as a ferreting/bushing or even rough shooting companion

Link to post

Not one of them is a Lurcher bd

touche'..........point taken :icon_redface:

 

 

how do work that out .?? a lurcher is a x of a (working dog = collie,gundog,terrier, to a running dog ) a 1x is the start of any line of lurcher, and regards litter wastage, any dog with half running dog should catch a rabbit and thats the quarry today, even collies,gsds, labs can the odd rabbit, so stick 50% greyhound to it carnt see they will that much wastage .!!

  • Like 1
Link to post

Not one of them is a Lurcher bd

touche'..........point taken :icon_redface:

 

 

how do work that out .?? a lurcher is a x of a (working dog = collie,gundog,terrier, to a running dog ) a 1x is the start of any line of lurcher, and regards litter wastage, any dog with half running dog should catch a rabbit and thats the quarry today, even collies,gsds, labs can the odd rabbit, so stick 50% greyhound to it carnt see they will that much wastage .!!

 

I think the point he's making Ray is technically the breeds mentioned were long dogs not lurchers.

  • Like 2
Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...