Guest bezza Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 (edited) I've seen some comical and some monstrous looking lurchers that just happened to inherit the wrong set of genes. For example a friend has a wheaten/grey which is a dead ringer for Greyfriars Bobby, runs like the latter too. I've seen some ripped bullcrosses which would struggle to catch a crisp packet in the wind. I had a collie/grey which was racy enough but inherited the temperament of a collie, and a wired- to- the-moon, hyper collie at that. It was super sensitive and would bolt for home if she heard a firework, jet engine or a bolt of lightning. Not easy to keep your temper when you've isolated an easy run on the lamp and your lurcher goes awol. Seriously which crosses are prone to a lot of litter wastage, or are all crosses equally susceptible to it? Keep it light lads, no wars or breed blindness. Edited September 13, 2012 by bezza Quote Link to post
paulus 26 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 pot licker to pot licker is always a bad choice 2 Quote Link to post
Chid 6,560 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 malumut x greyhound , they all bark at quarry :laugh: Quote Link to post
South hams hunter 8,924 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 Any first cross Quote Link to post
Guest bezza Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 (edited) It always makes me smile when someone posts the question what is such and such cross like? The answer is they are all different, sometimes in looks and sometimes in temperament . A lot will depend on the cross's early socialisation. A pup confined to a run will be a very different dog to one that is exposed to lots of different experiences. I'm not sure I go along with the worker to worker commandment either. There are lots of people who have chosen not to work whose parents worked all their days I think genetic inheritance is more important. Hancock's dogs have their critics but he would not be in business after all these years if a high percentage of his dogs failed to please their owners. Yet very few, if any of his breeding dogs work. Edited September 13, 2012 by bezza 2 Quote Link to post
birddog 1,354 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 Any first cross seriously ?............1st x saluki greyhound........or deerhound greyhound..........or whippet greyhound........seem to remember reading somewhere they throw lots of cloddy wastage Quote Link to post
South hams hunter 8,924 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 Not one of them is a Lurcher bd Quote Link to post
birddog 1,354 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 Not one of them is a Lurcher bd touche'..........point taken Quote Link to post
South hams hunter 8,924 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 Lol, but saying that ive seen throwbacks aswell that I would class as wastage. Lad I know has a golly bred bitch - 22 tts, body like a bull with the head of a whippet Quote Link to post
beast 1,884 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 had a bitch a few years ago bred from two very decent "bitza" lurchers, both big strong racey dogs, and she ended up 20"tts and 42lb. looked like a beddy cross collie with a few extra muscles. made a decent ferret dog but NOT what you would have wanted from the two parents. i thi k the more diferent breeds in the mix, the less predictable and more variation in the litter. but of course, a lot of dogs classed as wastage still have a use , as a ferreting/bushing or even rough shooting companion Quote Link to post
bird 9,942 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 Not one of them is a Lurcher bd touche'..........point taken how do work that out .?? a lurcher is a x of a (working dog = collie,gundog,terrier, to a running dog ) a 1x is the start of any line of lurcher, and regards litter wastage, any dog with half running dog should catch a rabbit and thats the quarry today, even collies,gsds, labs can the odd rabbit, so stick 50% greyhound to it carnt see they will that much wastage .!! 1 Quote Link to post
littlefish 586 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 Lol, but saying that ive seen throwbacks aswell that I would class as wastage. Lad I know has a golly bred bitch - 22 tts, body like a bull with the head of a whippet but.......can it work? Quote Link to post
South hams hunter 8,924 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 Depends what you want bird and there's a lot of difference between the odd rabbit and a good shift Quote Link to post
South hams hunter 8,924 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 Lol, but saying that ive seen throwbacks aswell that I would class as wastage. Lad I know has a golly bred bitch - 22 tts, body like a bull with the head of a whippet but.......can it work? Not how it was intended to be, it has neither the physical or mental attributes IMO but has the odd night lamping Quote Link to post
undisputed 1,664 Posted September 13, 2012 Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 Not one of them is a Lurcher bd touche'..........point taken how do work that out .?? a lurcher is a x of a (working dog = collie,gundog,terrier, to a running dog ) a 1x is the start of any line of lurcher, and regards litter wastage, any dog with half running dog should catch a rabbit and thats the quarry today, even collies,gsds, labs can the odd rabbit, so stick 50% greyhound to it carnt see they will that much wastage .!! I think the point he's making Ray is technically the breeds mentioned were long dogs not lurchers. 2 Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.